A DOCUMENTARY FEATURING mothers surviving Israel’s genocide in Gaza. A video investigation uncovering Israel’s role in the killing of a Palestinian American journalist. Another video revealing Israel’s destruction of Palestinian homes in the occupied West Bank.

YouTube surreptitiously deleted all these videos in early October by wiping the accounts that posted them from its website, along with their channels’ archives. The accounts belonged to three prominent Palestinian human rights groups: Al-Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights.

The move came in response to a U.S. government campaign to stifle accountability for alleged Israeli war crimes against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is what social networks do, the assholes at the top don’t mind erasing accounts and deleting comments when they are inconvenient for them. It is a more effective version of book burning.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    That can’t be. Every time I point out that youtube is a HORRIBLE place for people to make the source of record for movements, history, and general archival, and that blogging and text are more durable and necessary for these exact reasons, I get downvoted into oblivion. It must be a problem with reality because video good and video is the future and only reach matters.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I just want to say, I share your specific species of frustration here and understand it well. Ughhh.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel like aiding war criminals in deleting evidence should get your company destroyed.

    Maybe not all of Alphabet unless we can prove this was an initiative started from the top, but Youtube should be diassembled for one-sidedly purging evidence. Hopefully, those accounts kept offline copies.

    • HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I moved to NewPipe - no ads, and you can import your yt playlists and subscriptions so you don’t have to start from scratch. Plus it plays in the background and if the phone screen is off

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The major obstacle for me is recommend videos as I almost exclusively use that and youtube knows what to show me (good factual science channels, nothing with AI used at all, gaming and tech news, essays and documentaries etc.) and no other app than the official youtube one does that as far as I’m aware. (I use ReVanced though). I’ve really tried to jump over to newpipe and grayjay but I miss so much and never discover any new channels through them.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        NewPipe is fantastic and I encourage everyone to use it if they can, but I can’t really see how it’s related to the topic.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nothing, no matter how bad, evil, terrible, treasonous, or ihumane, will destroy youtube. Except if they fail to honor a C&D from Disney.

  • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    It does make me think twice about ever purchasing a google pixel. What another android phone that has good spam call protection or app?

    • tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Android in general is on its way out because google decided to remove sideloading programs that don’t have their approval.

      • oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It seems to work pretty well in my opinion.

        I still catch a stray every now and then, but if I had to ball park it off the top of my head I’d say less than once a month.

        But they come in spurts, so maybe they all change numbers and get through once, then back to the shadow realm for months in a row.

    • HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I moved to NewPipe - no ads, and you can import your yt playlists and subscriptions so you don’t have to start from scratch. Plus it plays in the background and if the phone screen is off

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      That work at such a scale, with “popular” content creator being able to actually share their content, for free? No, not really. There are small scale initiatives, but you likely won’t find much of the mainstream people on them. And, depending on what you use, you won’t find much at all, because searching for content is a mess unless you are directly pointed to it from somewhere else.

      There is a big issue with making up an alternative to youtube, at anything approaching the scale of youtube: it represents a lot of content, streamed from servers under strict time constraints, to many dozen/hundreds/thousands of people. With a centralized infrastructure that requires a lot of servers, spread over many places and many different networks. And these cost money. Using peer to peer at such a scale isn’t that great either, although with more popularity it could improve.

      Existing large providers such as youtube can handle this because they have such a vast CDN available, which allows sending one copy of a video into a region once, then spreading it across multiple diffusers, who then have a reasonable load on them.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Skimmed the article (yay for reader view) but it doesn’t really say WHY the channel was deleted?

    I am not in the slightest bit shocked by google bending over backwards to pleasure trump and netanyahu. But this also doesn’t seem like their MO. They are usually “good” about explaining what new rule they invented and why that suddenly gave a channel 40 strikes retroactively and I am not seeing that here?

    Whereas there are a few mid-size channels that have allegedly been flagged “by AI” as being other bad channels? Which… actually seems more likely since it is less youtube taking an actual stand on anything and more just deciding the ai slop channels that stole footage are the originators and to ban everyone involved.