• MrSmith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, to me, simply because it can be color managed. Just because VLC will play anything, doesn’t mean it’ll play it well.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, it is user-friendly in some ways, depending how you define that.

          Double-click a video and it opens. You get a visually appealing, sleek and minimalistic UI that helpfully appears only when your mouse is over the video, and otherwise gets out of the way. You can seek, adjust volume, select audio language and subtitles, and that’s it. Very uncluttered, obvious and easy in the way that modern applications try to be.

          For most usage, that’s enough. It’s when you find yourself needing to pan/scan, or change subtitle offset, or enable looping etc you discover there are no buttons or menus for those things and you have to go hit the docs to discover what the keybinds are.

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Minimalism rarely is ever user friendly is the problem.

            Minimalism has the assumption the user preknows how to do everything.

            User friendlyness is how you end up with button gore. It’s why UI/UX is so hard to do well.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Both are good tools for the job. I use mpv but VLC just works for 99% of use cases. mpv is best for working with terminals, vlc is best for GUI and is consistently easy on any operating system, even android.