Do you rarely vote on anything at all?

Do you upvote when something is interesting but rarely downvote? Do you downvote when something isn’t interesting but rarely upvote?

Do you vote to signal agreement or disagreement?

Do you vote to encourage insightful replies regardless whether you agree or not?

I rarely interact with the voting system on sites, aside from the occasional missclick, that is. While I think it can be useful when searching for answers or tutorials, especially on topics you’re not familiar with and can’t judge competence vs BS, I think in more social spaces it leads to both echo chambers and karma farming, and it feeds social media addiction by giving you little validations for every upvote you receive.

I also think it prevents people from having more meaningful interactions. Rather than replying with 'This was insightful", “I disagree because…” or “that was really funny” You just make a number go up or down.

  • zlatiah@lemmy.world
    2·
    4 days ago

    My personal upvote border:

    • This is the best thing I’ve seen today
    • Someone made a post/comment made in good faith that adds value to the community
    • Someone replied to me in good faith, as far as I can tell

    Neutral (no up/down-vote) border:

    • Someone made a post/comment that I didn’t think much about
    • Someone replied to me, but was not in good faith and/or seem factually dubious

    Downvote border (I rarely do that):

    • Someone made a post/comment that is factually wrong
    • Someone seems to be trolling, making an agenda, or doing something else nefarious

    I think maybe because of the lack of a meaningful “karma” system, people on the fediverse seem to be much more upvote-happy… less so than the beans era, but still a lot more upvote-happy than just about any Reddit community I still follow