Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform’s entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website “Bluesky Stats.” Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It’s impossible to know whether Musk’s comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great another social media platform from the same fart huffing dumb asses that sold Twitter… it’s like people don’t learn lessons.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        masto is fractured even further with different servers arguing in places (a bit like here tbh) over federation.

        And? Servers are inter-operable.

        • IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Until your home instance defederates from another instance. Sure, you can always make another account, but your average user wants a lower friction experience.

          I’m reasonably active in the fediverse, but I recognize that the more explaining it takes to the average user the less likely they’re going to want to join in.

          The old old top gear cool wall tried to hit on this concept. You could have a very technically excellent car classified as uncool because if you had to explain why it was cool to a normie you had already lost them.

          It will be hard for the fediverse to get over this hump, which is probably why you see so many Linux users here and so few say woodworkers or other (somewhat) more niche communities.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most average people would never notice defederation unless you told them. It’s pretty frictionless and drama free.

            The niche communities are always the last to come. It’s why they’re niche. That techie people are the first is nothing damming. It’s always been that way for every service.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I think Mastodon needs a third party app that makes it feel more like Twitter, similar to how reddit apps are switching to lemmy. Unfortunately, I don’t know if there were any third party Twitter apps that had the name recognition of the reddit ones.

        • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          THere were a few but they got bought (eg. tweetdeck).

          There are also 3rd party apps for mastodon that a lot of people like, and they try. But for many people, mimicking the parts of Twitter they value is difficult to do without proper backend support for supporting algorithms, and even then the way activitypub works it still makes it difficult to support for most developers.

          Two of the key features are discovering new or related content, which is hard to do in mastodon as it needs to calculate similarity across all of the profiles and their content in order to make recommendations – or collect data like your cell contacts to help you connect with people you already know. Most people don’t want contact sharing, and indexing all of the recommended profiles, especially across federated servers is challenging.

          The second is engagement based recommendations. Many social media users aren’t incredibly active. They want to open the app in specific moments to quickly catch up with everything since they last opened the app. To do this well, you need to know what they’ve engaged with and look back at content since they last logged on and rank it based on that. People may follow 1000 people, but really care about maybe 30-40 accounts the most. Friends, family, specific journalists or famous people. Mastodon just gives you like a sample of the last 50 or so items. If you follow anyone super active, you may just get a lot of noise in those updates.

          Obviously, there are times when everyone wants a linear timeline, but it depends upon their daily use.

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally. The android app is superb. It has come a long way with Material You theming, smoothness, and stuff. Compare that to the crap you would call twitter, X or whatever.

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a problem. Bluesky is privately-owned and will do same shit.

    Here are some explainations. And more.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also controlled by another crypto shill, so it has that in common with Twitter too.

    • PaulHulford@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      Each current member usually get at least one invite to share biweekly. That’s how they have been growing it.

      • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        1 year ago

        Google+ did the same thing when it rolled out, then they tried to force people to use it before they cancelled the project.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m still salty about that. Google+ was fantastic on release. Simple, clean, elegant, and fast. Then they steadily, systematically fucked it up. By the time it was cancelled, it had become unusable.

          • evatronic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            G+'s downfall was they kept it invite-only too long. Demand was there, people wanted in but Google was like, “Nah…”

            By the time it was open-access, everyone had moved on or back to their old social media platforms. It could’ve been great, but Google, in typical Google fashion, got distracted by something shiny and killed it.

            • wjrii@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              The sad thing is, if they’d thought even a tiny bit laterally and leveraged the fact that Google Reader was getting a lot of traction and a core of people were beginning to use its social functions, they could have backdoored themselves into being Digg/Reddit/Etc. and had the social media userbase to take on Facebook organically.

              Instead, they fought the last war (Gmail vs Hotmail), intentionally eroded and then killed Reader, and with G+ they completely fucked up what was a cleaner interface (if not all that special) and a better technological experience, all while they were a brand that was at that time more trusted than their competitors.

              • kescusay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yep. Once they screwed up G+, I committed to never becoming dependent on any Google service beyond Drive and Gmail, and only those two because they’re completely untouchable - Google couldn’t break those without having a mass rebellion on its hands.

      • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, in the shape of a pyramid? Sounds like a good business model. I wonder if anyone has ever done that before? (yes, it’s a joke)

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but I’m sure many recorded invites and didn’t bother. Musk musking TSFKAT ( the-site-formerly-known-as-twitter) was the needed motivation to accept it.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been trying to get an invite since June.

      Apparently if you ask, you’re not good enough or some shit.

      • cypher_greyhat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not missing anything. I eventually got an invite, found that 40% of the content was furry and I deleted my account.

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Invite only is a fascinating choice for a social network that requires network effect to succeed.

      Gmail is the most famous/successful example but interesting to note that email is a federated network that can interoperate with every other email address too.

      What about this bluesky network?

  • WorldWideLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was interested in it but at the end of the day Dorsey got Twitter into its initially mediocre state, and he’s endorsed RFK Jr. as well as Musk’s purchase of Twitter. So should I really expect it to be any better? I’ll keep an eye on it but my expectations aren’t terribly high.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      and he’s endorsed RFK Jr.

      Gross. Yeah Dorsey sucks generally.

      as well as Musk’s purchase of Twitter.

      But I don’t hold this part against him. If some moron came along and offered to drastically overpay for my house, for example, I’d endorse the fuck out of that even if he’s a shitheel.

    • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I signed up just to see the hype, and it’s the same boring Twitter, with less commitment. People just grabbing namespace.

    • mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s Jack Dorsey’s “Twitter but federated this time”, except there is only 1 instance, run by Jack…. But don’t worry, “Trust me bro” it will totally be federated/open.

      Maybe it will be but until it is it’s just as bad as Twitter.

      • Rambi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So is it going to be part of the fediverse at one point or will it be a separate federation?

        • Wrench Wizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          God… I’ve been on the “fediverse” for months and

          A: have no clue what it is

          And

          B: am not even entirely sure I’m on it anymore

          Love Lemmy but lol this is getting confusing, is Mastodon on Lemmy or… just federated or… sheesh I need to search this

          • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t really matter. If you find value in using it, just keep using it.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That hasn’t been specified, which suggests they’re aiming for the latter.

  • drdalek13@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I firmly believe Elon is trying to run Twitter out of relevancy, or business entirely.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree but I don’t understand why. What motivated him to sink 1/4th of his net worth into Twitter then kill it?

      • LUHG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Knowing this nutter he’s probably doing it so people can’t talk about the crappy Tesla QC.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        1. The jet tracker

        2. Twitter is a huge place where leftists organize

        3. Probably wants to pull a reddit and push Trump

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. I wouldn’t say that. It was filled with far-right and some people who like others to suffer and bring to suicide indie game developers.
          • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s also used by fascists but there have been a lot of genuine leftist organizing going down deep in the cracks of that hellsite.

      • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The lawsuit he was destined to lose. Why do people here so often act like this was his masterplan all along? He fucked around and tried to back out, then Twitter sued him into buying the company. From what I can tell this is just Musk being Musk, reportedly he has surrounded himself with yes-men.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that were true, the investors who paid him billions for the take over will want his head on a spike.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are so desperate for anything RESEMBLING twitter, that they’ll sign up for a trash service like BS.

    Mastodon undoubtedly has more brand recognition at this point.

  • nik0@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m so glad people are calling Bluesky out for the trash service it is. I just mastodon outlasts this crap and we get more people on there than bluesky

        • 13617@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh, but mastodon doesn’t have a good algorithm like Twitter it is hard to switch

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The whole point of Mastodon not having an algorithm to show you things is to put the user in control of what kind of content they want to see.

            Why do you need an algorithm to tell you what you are interested in? You go on Mastodon and subscribe to what you want to.

              • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re right. That word has always been kind of dumbly used as a replacement for something like, “feed manipulation controlled by corporate interests”. Every computer application uses algorithms in some way.

            • 13617@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because it’s hard to find things, the normal person is used to an algorithm

          • tourist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you run “Mark Zuckerberg” through google translate a few dozen times I’m sure it’ll spit that out at some point

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    God I hope he gets gaslit into actually making Twitter a subscription. It would be so funny

      • Rambi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is weird how he’s just completely running it into the ground… I don’t really buy that though because he never actuslly wanted the company and only bought it because a court forced him to. Also I honestly don’t think he’d want to wash 44 big ones down the drain just to own the libs.

        All I can think of is that he’s just… maybe kind of an idiot and has just gotten lucky so far lol? It’s the only thing that fits as far as I can see.

        • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some have suggested that the purchase was partly to prevent a second Arab spring. Saudi funding and increased cooperation make it a possibility but I’m not sold on any particular idea besides “avoid everything Elon touches.” Why anyone stayed on ragebait bot network: the website is beyond my understanding.