Follow up video from MegaLag on the Honey scandal.

  • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    He talks about how honey gets access to the codes by scraping every promo code submitted by the users. Doesn’t that mean that someone could automate something to submit false codes by the 100s whenever you are at checkout to fill PayPal with junk data? Making honey useless for everyone for that merchant because it can’t tell the real from the fake. An anti honey extension.

    What’s PayPal going to do? Try to sue because the data they are illegally obtaining is being tainted? Obviously the codes wouldn’t work on merchants so they are fine in this.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is basically already what my experience with honey was. Most of the codes didn’'t work.

      • Noja@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The thumbnail is satire, the video is from the person who originally exposed the PayPal Honey scam.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Right? It tickles something in the back of my brain that just makes me angry. I can’t really explain it. By all accounts, it’s a good video, but I just can’t get over the thumbnail.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean it has Mr. Beast’s AI-generated face with that disturbing grimace he always has and those creepy fake veneers.

          • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s Mr Beast? I’ve never watched anything of his, so I don’t know what he actually looks like. If this is one of his standard video thumbnails I now understand why people hate them/him so much!

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mean yes and no. It looks like a AI-generated image of Mr.Beast. Which is what he uses in all his thumbnails because he shills his AI image generation site.

            • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              It resembles him, that is more or less what he looks like, but it feels incorrect to say an AI generated image is an image of him. Before AI, all his thumbnails included him making stupid faces like this (because it was very effective). Now he, and everyone else, just uses AI images resembling him making stupid faces (because it is unfortunately still somehow effective)

              The social media algorithms have turned most people’s brain attention pathways into mush. Sometimes people get a shovel and a mop and start trying to dig their way through properly, but a lot of times they don’t get very far before it starts seeming impossible to make useful progress. It’s usually easier to just swim in the slop.

          • Zeddex@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I was thinking exactly that. Like is that really his face or is this GenAI? It has to be GenAI right?

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Either that or just terrible Photoshop. Seems to be what everyone is doing these days is just cartoonish Photoshop with bright colors for some reason.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t watch any videos with these stupid faces and I hate when someone I follow suddenly starts doing it. ಠ_ಠ

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I didn’t choose it (not my video).

      I’d encourage you to watch it anyway, if you can get past the trauma…

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        “trauma” is not the point here

        The point is that all YouTube videos now have these extremely annoying clickbait thumbnails and titles and that is not a good thing

        • 46_and_2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I hate them too, but that style of thumbnail has been a major YT thing for like a decade. Avoid them like the plague, myself, and even mark them as “not interested”, “don’t recommend channel” for the more annoying ones. Probably ain’t much of an impact, but at least teaching the algo what not to show me.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I’m gonna have to hide this post because it’s really creeping me out. It’s not even his video right? No way I’m clicking on that.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        23 hours ago

        No, it’s not my video, and it’s not like I chose the thumbnail.

        I’ll just say folks, this has left me with a “people just like to complain” vibes.

        The video is excellent, and exposing how the internet is the wild west of companies lying, cheating and stealing.

        Maybe you could engage with that, rather than the creator having to make a stupid thumbnail to keep the algorithm happy.

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I know it’s not your video, I meant it’s not the creator’s face on the thumbnail, sorry about that. I really can’t stand the thumbnail and I can’t give the click especially for a topic I don’t really care about. Honey sucks. I learned that a while ago.

          That being said, thank you very much for sharing the video.

  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I agree with most of it, but…

    If you (a business) want to give out coupons only “internally” (usually only to employees), allowing ANYONE to redeem them is just stupid. That system is designed to be exploited. IMO, this is either a bug or very bad application planning.


    And I have an idea for a “honey trap trap”… Whenever someone tries to redeem an “internal” coupon code in your shop, do this: If the person is employee, let them redeem it. If not, display “Attention! You have a dangerous spyware called Honey on your PC. Please uninstall it as soon as possible” with a link to this video…

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      To elaborate on this, since watching this video I’ve paid attention to how sponsorships provide discounts to viewers of creators, and it’s often via URLs. eg. service.com/creator_name, not with a discount code. That way, a website can track how many people went to the URL, not how many used whatever code is associated with that URL.

      As an additional blocking measure, maybe a website could simply create a different listing for the same product instead of relying on discount codes, this different listing only being accessible via the creator links. I’m not sure if Honey would figure out how to navigate that as well or not, swapping the item in the cart or whatever.

      I’d totally be interested to hear more on how companies deal with this, and if there are better ideas than the one I came up with as I typed this comment.

      • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        To elaborate on this, since watching this video I’ve paid attention to how sponsorships provide discounts to viewers of creators, and it’s often via URLs. eg. service.com/creator_name, not with a discount code. That way, a website can track how many people went to the URL, not how many used whatever code is associated with that URL.

        Part 3 of the video series will probably show how Honey f*cked that system up, too. 😄

  • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honey is a great example of corporate greed and enshittification turned to 11. It started as a simple free extension for collecting and trying discount coupons, and turned to a massive greedy scam with enough financial backing to start blackmailing webshops for profit.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Maybe? I do kinda doubt that as the original addon was benign and did exactly what it said on the tin to fix a problem one of the founders had themselves - finding and applying coupons automatically, and there isn’t an obvious way or need to monetise that.
        But they gained a massive userbase very quickly, which attracted investors like vultures ready to tear profits from those users. So even if they originally didn’t plan to do much more than scan for coupons, after a few years of venture capital greed and tens of millions of investor money, they definitely were chasing profits by any means necessary. Money corrupts, after all.

        And by the time Paypal was willing to pay $4 billion for them in 2020, it was blatantly obvious they were doing a lot of shady shit because there just isn’t a way to monetise free users that well while staying above the board.

        All of which is a damn shame, because the idea of an addon that scans and tries coupons for you is really simple and very useful :/

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought honey disappeared like two years ago after some scandal.