I can see it now: just get the enemy to breathe in a cloud of nanobots, or have the bots enter their body through an open cut that they make, and the enemy’s body is yours: no violence needed.

We live in a terrifying time because there’s just no way to dodge this sort of stuff unless you have the EMP tech, since a Hazmat suit is unsustainable to don long-term.

EDIT: No, I didn’t watch anything! I’ve been reading about how nanobots are currently being used in the medical field to clear plaque from arteries, so I have simply been chugging with that train of thought in a more nefarious direction…

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Well, “obsolete.” Unless your average home invader starts employing nanobots in their crimes guns will still be useful, just not against state level threats that can afford nanobots. Of course, those threats already have f-35s or whatever number we’re on now so guns are already of limited effect there.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Maybe, but drones are so much more fun, and millions of kids start volunteering for training to fly them starting when they are less than 10 years old, so there are plenty of experienced drone operators available at any given moment.

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    […] there’s just no way to dodge this sort of stuff unless you have the EMP tech […]

    I think that we are closer of advance EMP technology than remote controlled operative war nanobots that supose a non violent threat more than biological weapons (which I find quite violent and inhumane), not to mention that countermeasure evolution seems much easier than (if not as easy as) the effective sophistication of nanobots, just to say a few…

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Wait until you hear about viruses or prions. Truly terrifying nanobots. Worst of all, they already exist. Those things are out there right now.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Chemical weapons appear as a much better option than viruses. Enemy is there, drop a nervine agent and everyone is dead. Wait for a while and you’re free to advance.

      Viruses in much more difficult to operate: infect someone somehow - I guess a bomb or something like that could be used as well. Wait several months so that enemy actually gets infected on large scale, but not too long because most of them won’t be dying anyway and soon back to battlefield. In the meantime vaccinate the whole of your invasion army. Start producing massive quantities of vaccines just in case it spreads to your own country somehow and you’ll have to treat your own population.

      Assuming you were able to create both the virus and the vaccine within the period the war lasted, it may give you some bit of advantage during a period of 1/2 months or something like that. Good enough if you’re able to win the war in such period, but if you’ve got that kind of money to spend I’m sure you’ve got way more efficient options.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yep. Bio weapons are terrible in every way. Now that RNA vaccines are in production, making new vaccines just got a whole lot faster.

    • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Prions are absolutely wild. There is no cure, no “vaccine” - not that that would even be possible because they’re not viruses, bacteria, or even living things from outside your body. They’re just a faulty version of something that already exists in your system and they make your body self-destruct.

      • sircac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There have never been enough concerns to be worth to develop a vaccine for a prion, and current used techniques are those for being efficient for their targets, but as far as I know prions are just proteins and proteins can be (and are) targeted, the whole immunitarie system often relies on those…

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Prime horror movie material.

        You trust your body. You trust your mind. But what if the enemy… is already inside you?

        They’re not viruses. They’re not bacteria. They’re your own proteins… twisted. Hungry.

        They hide in the folds of your brain. They wait in the silence of your cells. And when they strike… you won’t even know you’re already lost.

        PRIONS

        COMING TO AN ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM NEAR YOU

      • XiELEd@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If a plausible zombie virus were to exist, it would definitely be those long-incubating stuff

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    We live in a terrifying time

    Well, the nanobots that you are describing do not exist, so they aren’t what is making the time terrifying

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean biological warfare already exists so no need to go 21st century with it. I’d imagine that even if the tech existed, it just wouldn’t be cost effective.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      We already had a sublime propaganda machine, yet here we are with AI anyway…

      And cost effective only matters if you actually want to solve problems for people, not if you want to make money by creating something nobody wants and have you and your friends in the military-industrial-political complex get astronomically rich together.

    • Prathas@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or, again, injects nanobots through that stinger, which then take control of your body. Why let a perfectly fine slave body go to waste by dying?

  • nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    They most probably won’t, there is literally zero chance that someone would kill you with nanobots.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    the borg, replicators(milky way) all use nano-robots as a method to attack thier intended victims, or assimilate them.

    its actually the basis of borg assimilating a planet, deploy cloud of nanoprobes into the infect the population through the atmosphere, they dont seem to do it often though.

    nano-tech is also big in sg1, where the goauld use them to infect and age the population, in sga they were use to infect humans and wraith.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is literally the concept of a popular science fiction TV series. I won’t say which one because I don’t want to spoil it, but its next season is eagerly awaited, and it was huge when it was airing its previous season(s).

    The series is based on books, and some fans of the series have read ahead; some have finished the books and know what all happens. Of course adaptations do change things, but killer nanobots that were used to wage war were the catalyst and a hidden plot point. I think the next season will reveal this.

    (No, it’s not Fallout. Fallout is good old-fashioned nuclear war. The show doesn’t follow any of the games, but they share the same lore. The show is changing some of that, adding onto it (e.g. Vault Boy origin story in the first season), but they aren’t changing that. Also, not based on books.)

    If you know, don’t say. Or at the very least use spoiler tags.

      • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You kinda can’t because that plot point hasn’t been revealed yet. That said, if you know that’s what’s going on, it makes the show’s first mystery trivial! I read the books after the first season, and I loved picking that mystery apart. I think after the first episode we had enough to speculate and go back and forth on theories. Of course now you can binge watch the whole season, so you aren’t forced to take all that time to think about it.

        spoiler

        The show is called Silo, on Apple TV. You don’t need an Apple device to watch it; Apple TV is on most smart TV app stores. You can also usually get a free trial. The show is 2 seasons so far. Again, nothing about the show says nanobots (yet). And be warned, the books were very thin on details, but the author is an executive producer on the show, and he’s adding a ton of stuff (and changing others). So they might change it, but you can read the books if you like the concept.

        So the back story is, humans killed each other with nanobots rather than nukes, and, much like the world of Fallout, they live in underground bunkers called silos. And also like Fallout (more so the games), some of the silos run experiments. Some social, some scientific. They have a ton of strange rules, knowledge is forbidden, all that good stuff.

        The mystery I mentioned was about the first person on in the series sent outside “to clean.” The question was whether what he saw on the visor real or not. Once you know they’re gassed with the nanobots as soon as they step outside (there is zero radiation out there), that explains the show’s first mystery. “But he’s in a suit,” you think. That gets answered by the end of the first season.

        Hope you can still enjoy it!

        • Prathas@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Thanks, that’s fine. I don’t think it’ll be a problem at all, since I read the entire plot summary to The Substance and was still floored upon watching it (though apparently some of the wording in the article was confusing so I didn’t even understand the whole plot lol).

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fallout the Show doesn’t follow any of the games because it’s an entirely new story told in that same universe. The games and show all share the same timeline, and yet each game (including the show) has an entirely different story, taking place at a different location and point in time, in each installment.

      So there’s really nothing for the show to follow, other than the established rules of the world it inhabits, and imo it does a very good job of that.