A very NSFW website called Pornpen.ai is churning out an endless stream of graphic, AI-generated porn. We have mixed feelings.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could be interesting. I mean for one thing no real person being expolited and those with strange fetishist can be satisfied. But could be very disturbing as well. Wonder how long until AI video porn?

    • guyrocket@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think it is just a matter of time for the disturbing stuff to circulate. If people can create their darkest desires they will.

      Then cue debates and political campaigns about AI in general and if we should allow anyone or anything to create depraved images, pronographic or not.

      • gullible@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s so good, sissy. You got even better after I amputated your legs.

        “We don’t intend to police the use of developing technologies at this time.”

        That’s so good, sissy, blind that billionaire with your acidic piss.

        “We cannot allow our children to be exposed to such grotesque videos.”

      • shortly2139@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People have been able to draw for eons. Imagine trying to ban the public from drawing because the odd few people are a little mixed up.

        AI is just a tool, like the pencil, charcoal or paints.

        I know you aren’t suggesting we ban it from the public, just my side of the hypothetical debate that your right in saying will arrive

      • Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, although I think part of the missing nuance is that people already did that, the difference being that now anyone can, in theory, create what’s inside their head, regardless of their actual artistic talent. Now that creation is accessible though, everyone’s having another moral panic over what should be acceptable for people to create.

        If anything, moving the more disturbing stuff from the real world to the digital seems like an absolute win. But I suppose there will always be the argument, much like video games making people violent, that digital content will become real.

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    “eh I’ll take a look”

    first thing I see is a woman on her back with her legs behind her head, smooth skin where her genitals should be and nipples in the middle of her buttocks.

    “alright then”

  • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure if I have the strength to clutch these pearls any harder over these articles. I peaked 8 articles ago.

  • sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who insist on real flesh porn will ultimately be viewed as weirdo’s out of touch with reality like people who insist everything sounds better on vinyl.

    Fast forward 25 years past the first Ai war and a ragged but triumphant humanity must rediscover the lost art of waxing.

    • Harpsist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would I want to encourage the flesh trade where real women are hurt? And are limited to what humans are physically capable of?

      When I can have AI generated people who are able to do anything imaginable and no one gets hurt?

      They’ll be arguments that ‘once people get used to the fantasies they’ll want to try it in real life’ but we all know that that just isn’t true fr 40 years of video games. There hasn’t been any uptick in the events of people eating mushrooms and jumping on turtles or - what ever the fuck a goomba is -

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    At what point was porn NOT graphic, but now this thing IS GRAPHIC. Are we talking all caps, or just a small difference between the live stuff and the AI shit? Inquiring minds want to know.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Are we ready”, in the sense that for now it’s 95% garbage and 5% completely generic but passable looking stuff? Eh.

    But, as this will increase in quality, the answer would be… who cares. It would suffer from the same major issues of large models : sourcing data, and how we decide the rights of the output. As for it being porn… maybe there’s no point in focusing on that specific issue.

  • Sume@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure how people will be so into this shit. It’s all so generic looking

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      The actual scary use case for AI porn is that if you can get 50 or more photos of the same person’s face (almost anyone with an Instagram account), you can train your own LoRA model to generate believable images of them, which means you can now make “generic looking” porn with pretty much any person you want to see in it. Basically the modern equivalent of gluing cutouts of your crush’s face onto the Playboy centerfold, only with automated distribution over the Internet…

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI is still a brand new tech. It’s like getting mad at AM radio for being staticy and low quality. It’ll improve with time as we get better tech.

      Personally I can’t wait to see what the future holds for AI porn. I’m imagining being able to get exactly what you want with a single prompt, and it looks just as real as reality. No more opening 50 tabs until you find the perfect video. Sign me the fuck up.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article mentioned that at least one OnlyFans creator reached out to make a model of their own content and also mentioned that some OnlyFans creators outsource writers to chat with fans. I don’t think this will meaningfully affect cam girls’ jobs. Once we are able to make live animated images realtime with convincing speech and phrases then probably.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does it say something about society that our automatons are better at creating similated genitals than they are at hands?

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I first heard Stable Diffusion was going open source, I knew this would happen. The only thing I’m surprised at is that it took almost 2 years.

  • Armen12@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI porn for the longest time has just looked so off to me, idk what it is

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some things I was able to put my finger on after looking at a bunch of the images in the feed:

      • It doesn’t do skin well, treating it more like a smooth plastic than a surface with pores, wrinkles, and fine hairs.
      • It doesn’t understand lighting, so shadows don’t agree with highlights or even each other.
      • It doesn’t understand anatomy. A lot of the images were fine in this regard but others had misplaced muscles, bones, and impossible limb positioning/truncation.
      • It has no idea how to draw vaginas. Nipples are also not well understood, though it does better on average with those. They still look more like a plastic than skin, but most of them were passable at least, while I didn’t see a single vagina that looked even close to right.
      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, so many humans drawing porn don’t understand anatomy or what vaginas look like. It’s hard to train when your input data is already bad.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, a lot of the vaginas on that site look like hentai vaginas. I can understand it more with AIs since vaginas have a ton of variance to them, so trying to make an “average” vagina will end up not looking like any actual one.

          But the artists that draw them like that just disappoint me (though with the caveat that I have no reason to believe I’d do any better if I were to draw that). There’s a ton of inspiration out there and many do an amazing job with the rest of the body, why do they make one of the important parts (for porn) look like an afterthought?

          Though the anime style ones aren’t as bad as some others where the AI seems like it’s trying to average boy and girl parts lol.

          • Spaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tbh, if people don’t know the difference from a vagina and a vulva, I don’t expect AI to do a great job generating any good porn.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Using a term casually rather than medically won’t affect the quality of AI porn. Though maybe ensuring it knows the difference between a labia, clit, urethra, vagina, and asshole will produce better results.

          • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be fair, the focus of this era’s porn has hardly ever been the vagina, under any amount of scrutiny. A few aspects of sex in porn prioritized higher are, in no particular order: bounce, sounds, phrasing, setting, texture, animism/passion, power roles, etc. Hell, I’d rather that more effort has been made to visually hide prophylactic use than to focus on the vagina itself.

            I’m not in any way saying I agree with this, simply pointing out the facts as they are these days.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meh. It’s all only women and so samey samey. Not sexy IMO, but I don’t think fake is necessarily not hot, art can be, certainly.

    • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can change it to men, but most of the results are intersex(?) or outright women anyway. I guess the training data is heavily weighted toward examples of women.