Theatres are meant to be places to watch movies, and movies are an art form. The garbage Hollywood is putting out these days is designed-by-committee bullshit. Not art. So yeah, theatres will probably die because they’re not making art anymore.
I’m not sure I understand this take. Are you specifically talking about Hollywood vs. indies? I would consider PTA a part of Hollywood and I thought One Battle After another was fantastic. Same for people like Zach Cregger, Yorgos Lanthimos, or Danny Boyle.
My local theatre shows some new artsie movies. We go to see them, and some are great.
But the theatre is usually close to empty.
I don’t think expunging the bland, mass market movies would save theaters, even if they did.
His newest flick was excellent and it bombed, so there’s some disconnect here. I think it suffered a Shawshankian fate though.
Quality of Hollywood films is the main reason people avoid theatres. No one is paying those prices to watch 11% rotten tomatoes films.
There are films I get angry with even after torrenting.
Tron: Ares has entered the chat. Wtf was that trash
Going to the movies has become unbearable. Even if Hollywood didn’t produce nothing but mindless trash and the whole evening didn’t cost an arm and a leg, there’s always at least one group of assholes in the theater who don’t know that you’re supposed to keep your mouth shut at the movies. I used to go regularly and often, but now I only go on rare occasions.
Leo should love Blu-rays.
You can actually own them, and they’re 19 years old.For me to go see a movie in a theatre it needs to be an experience that is enhanced by the theatre.
Action/adventure movies like the Avengers were much better in theatre than on my tv at home because the scale of the image and sound add to the epicosity of the film.
For a comedy or a romance film a theatre only adds to the cost of viewing. Its alright for a date night but theres not really a point otherwise.
Mmmm, pay a significant part of my income to go to some shitty badly maintained theatre to watch some slop that even the director or actors couldn’t be bothered to make well while the rest nog the world is burning
Sounds enticing!
I’d pay thrice the price if seating was good, volume was 75% of current levels, talking was policed, Mary Jane was finger banged in a car instead of the row behind me, popcorn weren’t thrown around, phones were off, commercials didn’t last 25 minutes before the main showing started, I could press pause and go to the bathroom or for a snack.
Everything you said was completely reasonable and actually practiced in many theaters except that last part.
I was definitely being facetious 😄
My point is partly that not only do cinemas have to deal with managing all these people in there, they also have to compete with significantly better AV setups in people’s homes. Screens are much bigger, OLED, with surround sound at home. And at home I CAN press pause.
When cinemas were a big thing, people were lucky and wealthy if that had a 40” plasma at home. Now, you can get a 55” screen for the price of taking the family to a cinema 4 times.
That’s a very valid point. I think it’s more about the experience of going there with your friends, ordering popcorn etc.
I’ve been to the cinema alone, but that’s usually only if I reeeally want to see the movie ASAP and it’s not out anywhere else in the seven seas (if you know what I mean). Other than that it’s always been about going there with friends. Kind of like music festivals - I enjoy them for every reason except the music part :D (with exceptions)
I can’t take the commercials after paying 50 bucks. This is why I only attend rep cinemas. They once tried to project a single commercial and a large group of us pounded on the door of the now ex manager.
Make better films
The only movie theatres I still go to are pretty much jazz bars. Art Deco interior, very comfortable recliners and sofas, full bar, everyone has their own little table with a lamp and you can order in a cheese plate if you want. The tickets are a bit on the pricier side, sure, but I think it’s worth it. They show both new and old movies and often host events related to them.
So for me, movie theatre’s have never been better, as long as you avoid the AMC owned ones.
I have a local community of owned not for profit art deco era theatre near me. Managers complain the biggest problem is good films are rarer than ever, even in the indie space.
Appetite for movie theaters? Sure.
Appetite for overpriced tickets, garbage movies, snacks at 1200% market prices and 30 minutes of ads? No thanks.
I pay 6€ for cinema tickets and just don’t buy any snacks and drinks. The fact that you can’t pause the movie, or check your phone, is worth it for me, I just get distracted too easily when watching movies at home. And ads are easy to avoid by just showing up 20 minutes late.
I do avoid big Hollywood productions mostly though, and try to stick to indie productions or documentaries.
The only major annoyance I have is that I frequently get patted down because they assume I’m smuggling in my own food from outside
get patted down because they assume I’m smuggling in my own food from outside
If my local theaters did this I would never return. Its not a fucking airport.
If my local airports did this I would never return. Its not a fucking church.
You go to a church that does patdowns? Where’s the faith?
I have faith that I’ll get to receive a patdown.
(𓁹‿ 𓁹)
Yeah our theater is so understaffed that they hardly ever check for tickets. Matinees are still affordable once in a while at around $10.
deleted by creator
I used to love it. But there are more important things to spend the $50 bill on.
I have plenty of apetite for movie theaters, I don’t have apetite for taking the time to going to the movie theater to watch a mediocre movie…
Nothing about the movie theater experience draws me in anymore. The exception being Alamo Drafthouse. Last time I went to a Regal theater they had legitimately 15 to 20 minutes of straight up fucking commercials before the showing, before the trailers. I’m already paying out the ass for the ticket and food and you’re still showing me commercials? Nah. That alone is enough to turn me off to it. Alamo Drafthouse on the other hand may be a little more pricey, but it’s god great food and drinks and no fucking ads. They also have a high respect for no talkers in the theater and adults only on most showings or require an adult with them. End rant.
Alamo Drafthouse FTW
I’m always taken aback by people who complain about the leading ads. Been going to movies 20-minutes late for over 20-years. Yet everyone acts surprised and annoyed that ads lead in.
But yeah, I’d love an Alamo around here. We had a place with $1 movies. You could eat and drink, move your chairs around, all that. :(
My gripe, at least with amc is that the ads/trailers start at the “showtime” and are still 30 mins. The “showtime” should be when the actual movie starts. I show up 25-30 mins after posted time to skip most ads. It just doesn’t make sense to me. I’d honestly prefer a trailer free movie experience.
Legitimately it may have been that I missed when they decided to make that change as I hadn’t been to a mainstream theatre in years and took my kids to see something.
Hollywood churns out mostly dogshit quality movies, reboots, and sequels, of which a single ticket is around $20.
A family of 4 could easily spend over $100 just to see one mediocre movie.
Either Hollywood movie studios works with theaters to change that reality, or theaters die, and studios get acquired by streamers without any fear of antitrust to hold them back.
The only change I can see them making is increasing their ticket and concession prices.
Theatres aren’t helping with their inane markups.
I love theaters, but I haven’t been in a long time because it’s a big investment of time.
I like IMAX, I like that theaters now have better food rather than just popcorn.
I don’t like that there’s half an hour of advertisements before the film, or that basic politeness etiquette seems to have gone the way of the dodo bird and the kids will be on their phones and talking and what not
