I think the internet will get worse in the future; someone gets offended by everything, nobody lives without being criticized here.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    we’re already seeing a division, between pubnet, darknet, tor, and I2P. I think we’re going to see tor support drop for I2P and it become the new freenet that doesn’t have all the corpo bullshit on it.

  • DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Stratification between the corporate and the free world.

    On one side, you have bots, bots, and more bots. Enshittification running rampant. AOL-style locked-down platforms, but worse, because they steal your data and your soul to fuel their profits.

    On the other side of the fence is the side of freedom. The fediverse will have more users. Also, old-style personal websites/blogs could make a comeback.

  • MuttMutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    More and more apps messing things up. Companies want you to use an app so they have more access to data and better ability to control your habits driving more money into their coffers.

    More radicalization and sensationalization of everything. Use the news as an example. It used to be straight reporting of what happened, now it’s about ratings and how many descriptive words you can use to make the news more dramatic.

    Advertising will get worse, more ads, larger ads, more annoying ads.

    There will be a bigger divide between the corporate conglomerate internet and the decentralized internet. People who feel marginalized will begin to break away and and the rest of the internet will look at them like they are crazy.

  • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’ll be the same but the enshittification will just be amplified. I mean, we’re already here where people are talking to AI bots.

    The Dead Internet Theory is real.

  • Everyone will have to reveal their true identity with selfies and photo ID uploads.

    VPNs will be outlawed.

    Just look at the stuff the UK and Australian governments, as well as many states in the USA, are doing.

    I can see me using TailsOS more frequently than I do now and giving up my smartphone for more analog methods.

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m starting to see this amongst my techie friends: invite only enclaves. Like, using matrix or signal chats that are only by invite; Jellyfin servers for streaming, again, among friends. Group cloud services like nextcloud, mail servers cut off from email at large… Internet-like services, but for small groups.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kinda sounds great. I was on a city-based discord server for about a year before I got bored and sick of arguing. I guess I’m technically still on it.

      I made some friends. Almost had a couple face to face meets with the idea of exploring actual friendships, but he was more conservative-leaning than I (but very reachable) and kept getting into fights and leaving discord for bouts. He took the “suburbs are evil” crowd a little too seriously.

      Not utopian, but having the geographical focus in common and knowing we could meet these folks face to face as we go about our days I think added an honesty and restraint to the interactions.

      It also gives it sort of a community extension vibe without the douchebaggery of HOA Facebook groups or corporate bullshit of Ring neighborhoods.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It will be horrible.

    There will be more and more people (like me) searching for things like lemmy and Gophernet and IRC to avoid corponet. Normies will wallow on the 3 corporate websites like they’ve been doing for 10 years.

    Its already borderline unusable even with proper tools (waterfox, ublock, searxng/kagi are a MUST)

    Truly, the good days of the internet are gone and will only come back in underground form.

  • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Regions will be walled off by censorship / content laws, freely accessible information will be a thing of the past, you’ll have to pay a subscription for anything you want to do, and you will own nothing.

      • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That’s how newspapers used to work. You were able to read the front page for free at the news stand, for the rest of the thing you had to buy it.

      • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re not thinking nearly dystopian enough. Want to play a game? Need a cloud gaming subscription. Want to send an email? Add Gmail to your Google subscription for $5.99 a month. Want enough speed to stream higher than 720p video? Gotta pay your ISP for the bandwidth and YouTube (Google again!) for the access. You will rent everything from the system.

  • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Two internets, the regular one taken over by companies like what is happening now, and wider adoption of tor or something like it.

    Then lots of local and community networks air gapped from the internet.

  • jimmy90@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    we will live in a content rich p2p utopia once effective distributed administration has evolved sufficiently

    it will be an alternate internet run from our homes

    it’s gonna be beautiful

  • notsosure@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    It won’t be global anymore, the USA will have its own local-version, china, Europe, Russia too. The pressure on manipulative social media will increase, meta, alphabet etc will be banned more and more. As part of this WWW3, sea cables will be cut, causing outages.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Like mortal engines. Islands of small functional communities amidst a wasteland of AI generated content, occasionally having to scatter and reform elsewhere when the corps find them and attempt to Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (or just DOS with content scrapers) them.

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago
    • There will one Internet for us and one for the powerful people.

    Theirs will be what they want it to be, while ours will be:

    • Without any right to privacy (no pseudonym like mine, no VPN, no email aliases and obviously no true cryptography or fully encrypted whatever service: they will legally own the keys and the know the ID of all of us), and with constant tracking of our every moves and words. All of that because ‘think of the childrenand, like you rightfully mentioned, in the name of protecting every single individual so-called right to not ‘feel offended’. While in reality they just want us to remain silent.
    • That Web will be the online version of what Malls used to be, just a lot worse. It will be a place to consume, not a place where we are allowed to think and discuss. With little room left to personal websites/blogs, or amateur content because…
    • Like with access to VPN that is now being questioned, I doubt It will remain legal for a mere people like us to even own a personal website and a domain name. Businesses, sure. People? Nope (see the “think of the children” and the “don’t offend anyone” in the 1st point). Instead we will all be pushed toward using ‘social media’, those owned by a few well known-corporations not any Libre ones.
    • Saturated with ads, obviously it’s the main use of that Web: to sell us stuff. With laws and regulations (like we already have against copying and removing DRM from what is supposedly ours since we purchased it) that will make it a crime to obfuscate or not watch said ads (making it a crime to use an adblocker, or at least one that really works). They may even manage to make it impossible to not display ads on one’s ‘own’ online space whether they want it or not.
    • Filled with garbage content that will be deemed good enough for most of us which, coincidentally, will be made a lot easier since most educative systems, here in the West, have decided it was not useful to teach kids how to properly read and write, or how to properly use critical thinking anymore. So, stupid content for a stu… uneducated population, perfect world.
    • Content written and made by AI, undoubtedly. Good enoughn much cheaper and with zero risk of letting escape any unwanted data or piece of information that would allow some of us to realize maybe things are not right the way they are.
    • A lot of ‘amusing’ content, to keep us entertained (and not thinking).
    • Probably a lot of (carefully selected) porn too, since lifelong celibacy seems it could become a real issue while people will still have ‘natural urges’ to satisfy even without a partner.

    One day, while playing in their great-grandparents attic, a kid living in that society will find an object long forgotten. It will be all dusty and they will brush it to realize it has a shiny cover with bright colors. They will open it and gasp in surprise. The interior looks like if a pile of sheets of paper were glued together. They will flip those sheets and will wonder what use was there for all those black squiggly lines running all over them. What was it used for? And then, already bored with that odd object without a screen, with multimedia, that kid will put it back with all the other dusty objects not knowing this object used to be called a book and that those odd squiggly lines were called print. And that people were able to read books and they were used to help people learn and think better, or just have fun all by themselves. That kid will swiftly move back to the living room because the next episode of some series is soon to begin and, with everyone else in the family watching their very own content in silent, while they all wait for the meal to be delivered by some Uber drone. At one moment, that little kid will realize their fingers are all dirty from the dust in the attic, they will shrug and quickly move their attention back to their screen because its the ads playing, every 3 minutes, and they’re always the most exciting content of the show!

    A perfect world.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Youre totally right, I mean the majority of people haven’t read a book in multiple years so we arent far off from that. And people can barely hand write any more as well.

      Im not even old and I can see the collapse looming.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        We also need to be identified to buy a domain name here in Europe (in most of it, at least).

        As a user, I’m still allowed to own a random domain name but I need to be identified to buy it (and the informations need to be valid). I’m also allowed to not use my real name to sign whatever I publish online but for how long? It feels to me like this too will soon go away (its too easy, and for them it probably is too tempting, to conceive a law that will make it way too risky for poor little children to read random posts by random people hiding behind a pseudonym, even if their real identify has already been registered for years and even if said content is solely aimed at adult readers.

        That won’t be a big deal for me, I used to publish under my real name a few, many, years ago. I should be able to do it again… if I ever decide it’s worth publishing anything. But a law of this type will probably become the real tombstone under which the online freedom of expression will rest.
        RIP, dear friend.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wise, I wouldn’t know but since I’m not rich I know a lot of people will sincerely doubt it, instead considering I’m just another loser. They probably would be right?

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      No kidding. Here I was today just trying to do an image search for some game artwork, and about half of the results were AI-generated slop, hosted on sites boosting their SEO by listing hundreds of keywords people might search for.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    We will enter a period where you aren’t allowed online unless you present a government issued identification as proof of age and/or national origin.