ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoThat's nice that they got a rejection letter though instead of being ghosteddiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1896arrow-down112
arrow-up1884arrow-down1imageThat's nice that they got a rejection letter though instead of being ghosteddiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square134fedilink
minus-squareErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-23 hours agoThat’s completely non-binding for the receiving party. It is intended to stop people intercepting emails intended for other people. If the recipient chooses to disclose information that was intended for them, there is nothing the company can do. You can’t unilaterally impose a duty of confidentiality on someone unless they have explicitly agreed to it in advance. If they want to prevent someone from sharing info they would need to get the person to sign an NDA.
minus-squareFalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 minutes agoOh, I didn’t know that. So it is legally binding if you got the mail by accident? Thanks for sharing!
That’s completely non-binding for the receiving party. It is intended to stop people intercepting emails intended for other people. If the recipient chooses to disclose information that was intended for them, there is nothing the company can do. You can’t unilaterally impose a duty of confidentiality on someone unless they have explicitly agreed to it in advance. If they want to prevent someone from sharing info they would need to get the person to sign an NDA.
Oh, I didn’t know that. So it is legally binding if you got the mail by accident? Thanks for sharing!