• hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I think we put in speed bumps a few years ago due to an employee complaint about speeding. I hate whoever suggested that. Not because people weren’t speeding/ riding tails, but now half the people drive 10 MPH going over 20 MPH speed bumps.

    In reality we’ve had a lot of good things due to suggestions over the years.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Speed bumps now are designed to make SUVs do 20. I don’t have an SUV, I can’t do 20 over them!

      • Doom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Meanwhile in my jeep, “what speedbumps?”

        It’s almost as if speedbumps are stupid. If they really wanted to address speeding traffic calming designs would have done it better and been prettier to look at.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You’re right. We should replace them with an automatic speed camera hooked up to automatic machine guns.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Seriously though, lane narrowing is more effective at speed reduction and traffic calming than speed bumps. Both, even, are better for particularly stubborn stretches of road.

            This does a much better job at reducing car speeds, and it is also vehicle size agnostic. People on SUVs feel far more threatened by narrowing lanes and will absolutely slow down. While they will plow through a speed bump because they can’t feel them with their emotional support tank’s suspension.