• thericofactor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    21 days ago

    Sodium ion batteries have less energy density as opposed to Lithium ion (100-150 WH per Kg instead of 150-250). I’m curious how much these “wet” batteries improve that. The article doesn’t say.

    Nonetheless, even if it’s not the new battery for your car, it could be useful as energy storage for the grid, storing green (solar) energy for the night, and desalinating seawater at the same time.

    • apftwb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      the strategy of retaining crystal interlayer water yielded a specific capacity of 280 mA h g−1 at 10 mA g−1, one of the highest capacities reported for SIB cathodes in literature.

      All I could find. This isn’t a statement about capacity(?) Units are wrong(?)

      Its worth noting how preliminary this research is. Currently these “batteries” are just jars with chemicals.

      https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2025/TA/D5TA05128B

      https://www.rsc.org/suppdata/d5/ta/d5ta05128b/d5ta05128b2.mp4

      • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        mAh/g (milliamp-hours per gram) is essentially still a measurement of capacity, but in terms of current instead of power.

        We can do a little dimensional analysis here to translate between them. Power = Current x Voltage, so you’d multiply this (Current x Time)/(Weight) value by the nominal voltage of the cell to get to (Power x Time)/(Weight).

        Phone batteries are often specified in units of Current*Time (e.g. milliamp-hours), but I’m not completely sure why. I think it has to do with voltages being standardized for certain types of cells, so the only real variable in the battery capacity is the current.

        Edit: rearranged some ideas to make more sense

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 days ago

          I’m not completely sure why

          I think it’s marketing

          5000 mAh is much a bigger number than 19 Wh and marketing loves huge numbers

          Kinda like BMW did with the i3.

          In 2013 Tesla was selling a model with a 60 kWh battery so BMW had the genius idea to install a 20 kWh battery BUT refer to it as “60 Ah” battery.

          Tesla introduced the 90 kWh battery? BMW responds with a 94 Ah battery (28 kWh)

          Newest Tesla has 100 kWh battery now? BMW has 120 Ah battery (38 kWh)

          “See? Higher number!”, says the marketing

          And in order to have a comparable range number they had to implement heavy weight reduction techniques like using carbon fiber for the body, negating any cost saving from the smaller battery AND giving the owner a total loss after small collisions as it shatters instead of bending

        • apftwb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          multiply this (Current x Time)/(Weight) value by the nominal voltage of the cell to get to (Power x Time)/(Weight).

          This is the part that annoys me. The nominal voltage could vary between different batteries. 200Ah/g means different capacity for a 6v battery verses a 48v battery. I’m guessing battery scientists are using standardized nominal voltages for these tests or are seeing the same Ah/g capacity at different voltages (that I may have simply missed in the paper because I skimmed it and I don’t claim any deeper knowledge on battery research)

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 days ago

      And instead of charging them, you can drink them! Unlike Lithium Ion batteries, which you have to chew.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      My very uneducated understanding is that sodium batteries can be produced virtually anywhere.

      Not every battery application needs to maximize energy density, so sodium batteries are good where that is the case.

      I also did not read about sodium ion batteries characteristics versus lithium ion, so there might also be other use cases where sodium ion batteries are better.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Exactly this, there’s a huge market for energy storage, where cost, power and cycle life matter way more than size and weight. And Na-ion can be produced in countries that do not have access to lithium mines, making transport less of an issue and countries more self-sustaining.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        Hilarious…all of these batteries are coming out of one country because only one country is doing serious R&D.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          If the data is available for mass production, you just need to copy paste the factory and establish the trading partners for supply chains.
          Not the same issue as, for example, ASML and China.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      There is a branch of battery research that is only focused on grid storage. It’s the last piece to make solar and to a less extent wind unbeatably affordable.

      In a home solar setup, batteries are the other half of the cost and have not fallen as fast as the cost of the panels themselves, the other half of the cost. For fully off grid setups, they quickly become the main cost.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    21 days ago

    Desalinating water might be the best part. Usually, solar power has the downside of needing storage and desalination has the downside of big energy requirements. If you can do both at the same time, it’s a big win for dry climates with lots of sun

    • FlyForABeeGuy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      21 days ago

      There is also the issue with the salt by itself in desalinisation. If it’s removed with water, you have to deal with that stuff. Table salt is really cheap and there is plenty of offer, so you can’t really economically clean it enough and package it for human consumption or industrial use. So what usually happens is that they dump it back at one moment or another. And that is a hard pollution, and can lead to dead zones around the desalinisation plants if not managed well enough. Being able to add it in a high demand product such as batteries takes all those hurdles away

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      They are not going to get the sodium from desalination, they will mine it because it’s cheaper.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    Every week with the “miracle battery!” headlines. This has been going on for ages and I’m sick of it.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      20 days ago

      Sodium-ion batteries are not hype though, they are in production use in multiple industries already. They are generally superior to Lithium based batteries in all regards, with the exception of having a bit lower energy density. An equivalent LiFePO4 battery might be 70-80% of the size for the same storage. It’s not a big deal for large applications like cars and solar storage.

      • J92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah, the advantages of all these sodium batteries, in my mind, is that they are stable and rugged enough to build up a backbone of a energy storage system for a grid. I’m seriously thinking about them for my house, in the UK.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Yes, I am very intrigued. For something the size of half a shipping container I could power my house for almost a month. This is of course fantasy because I don’t have $20,000 to throw down. But combine it with solar cells that have gotten really cheap and you could indefinitely power your house for next to nothing.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        If they have a bit lower energy density than Lithium batteries, then where does the claim that they store twice the energy come from?

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Twice the energy than the previous sodium battery tech. Nowhere does it say its twice as good as Li-ion. That’s an assumption you made.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Sounds like it came from that article about the new kind of sodium batteries with vanadium that are doing that desalination business. I was describing the general technology rather than that specific new one in the article.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Charged with fusion power! From space! Made from privately mined asteroids!

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    21 days ago

    Sodium Ion already does 5000+ cycles. Adding Vanadium is not a scalable material. It is very expensive. 400 cycles steady is not useful information because it needs to do much more. They didn’t state a wh/kg density. This is probably not a viable research vector, but “big Vanadium” has proposed a rental model to make Vanadium more scarce for other applications. Flow batteries (a fuel cell with tanks of electrolytes) provides an ultra easy way of recycling/selling the vanadium for traditional uses. Battery rental that forces returning it could be viable.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 days ago

      Right up there with the batteries that would contain about 1 kg of silver in them. Even if they didn’t become insanely expensive you’d have tweakers foaming at the mouth to steal your batteries.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    Finally a new one!

    It was too quiet during the whole last year. But before, we had about 2 revolutionary new battery technologies every week.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 days ago

    Sodium Ion is a real game changer. But I doubt it will compete with Lithium Ion on energy density anytime soon.

    But that’s not necessary to make major changes in the power grid. Solar and wind is already cheapest form of energy generation even considering the expense of Lithium to store the energy when renewables aren’t generating. If you’re just installing stationary battery banks, you don’t care that much about the energy density as you would for a battery in a car or phone. Set up banks of cheap sodium ion batteries strategically and not only do you have plenty of power stored for when it’s not sunny or windy, you may avoid widespread power outages when power lines are downed.

    • ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Sodium ion has the same “energy density”, but lower density because of its honeycomb structure.

      This story is actually about a sodium-vanadium wet battery, not sodium ion. NaVn batteries are a wet flow battery that have been around for a while, they are intended for stationary power use.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    New tit ion battery generates fifteen times the power and shits butter pecan ice cream. And, like every other battery chemistry there’s ever been a news article for, isn’t real and will never enter production.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      I see that sentiment on every battery news, but it sure seems to me like battery tech is advancing quite drastically. Are there over-hyped headlines and articles pumping up tech that isn’t anywhere near completion? Sure, but meanwhile EVs have become a thing, house batteries, etc.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    Man this title reminded me of an old animation involving iPhone and some Android phone, lemme go find…

    https://youtu.be/YWNQTpdcoC4

    The part about transforming into a jet and flying you to an island reminded me of the title.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      Low capacity is my guess.
      Dunno if the article is the same I have read a few days ago but the, mentioned “everything” except the comparable capacity to sodium or lithium batteries.
      And I can’t imagine that the capacity for salty water with tofu remnants is much higher than a sodium battery which is atm serialized for mass production runs (isnt it even available in some capacity as a commercial product?)