The reviews I watched we’re pretty upset; steam reviews are mixed/mixed.

Firebreak got some real hate at release. What have yall done to address player concerns?

I don’t think it was as direct of a choice as it was a slow sinking into inevitability.

And did any boomer really have a choice for Nixon to NOT close the gold window?

Tastes so good, or at least it did years ago.

The EPA cannot make regulations… But ICE, an agency that doesn’t even have real law enforcement powers, can just ignore the fourth amendment entirely because the president said so?

Today you learned the difference between creating regulations and enforcing existing regulations, congrats.

If ICE violates your 4th amendment rights shutup and enjoy your multimillion dollar lawsuit. If you aren’t entitled to said lawsuit then your rights weren’t violated.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Where “doing something wrong” is “protesting the actions of ICE.”

Don’t confuse protesting with obstructing federal law enforcement.

I absolutely support anyone’s right to protest any aspect of our government.

Removed by mod

It’s not what they’re called that makes the difference

Then stop asserting they’re not police officers like it means something, when you just acknowledged that it doesn’t.

It’s that they swear allegiance to the Constitution but are trampling on the whole Fourth Amendment

Yeah I don’t think they are, and in the situation where it’s borderline it’s due to to aggressive mobs obstructing them from their duties. Situations where there is actual constitutional violations should absolutely be handled in the court, not by flash mobs obstructing then from proceeding.

What is there about that you don’t seem to understand?

The relevance to the point you’re trying to make.

The fact that FBI agents and ICE officers are not called “police officers” (in the traditional local/state sense) has virtually no relevance to their ability to enforce the law. The label itself is largely semantic and does not limit their legal power.

ICE aren’t police

This is kind of a symantical useless statement. They police immigration law, they are officers of immigration law, but for some reason convenient for you, you don’t want them to be able to be called police officers.

Removed by mod

If ICE did something wrong it doesn’t legitimize the protestors to follow that up by also doing something wrong.

It may legitimize it in your eyes, but not the eyes of the law.

And cut out the name calling, there’s no way you can be seriously think im a boot licker while also trying to have a serious conversation with me… Unless you’re just ridiculous.

Nope. Didn’t say any of that.

Did I say ICE were police officers? No I did not.

However police officers vs. Federal law enforcement officer - Not much difference IMO.

Ice polices immigration law, and they’re officers of immigration law; but somehow they’re not police officers… some symantical BS.

Absolure brain rot from the left.

Nothing about the constitution enables the public to obstruct the duties of a police officer.

Infact The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

Cox v. Louisiana (1965), 379 U.S. 536

Protestors blocked access to a courthouse and were arrested. The Supreme Court upheld the arrests.

If you want to protest the police you can do that. But you cannot protest the police by stalking and then spontaneously inhibiting their abilities to perform their job.

What about this is lawful protest? Go prevent a police officer from fueling his police vehicle and see how fast you go to jail for obstruction.