A new European initiative dubbed UnifiedAttestation aims to build a free and open-source alternative to Google’s Play Integrity checks. The initiative is backed by smartphone maker Volla, while other partners include /e/OS maker Murena and the team behind iodé OS. The feature will be distributed under an Apache 2.0 license.

    • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Jeez. They really don’t. And, I guess they shouldn’t. Their stance is that device certification shouldn’t be necessary in the first place which I agree with considering this is not done for computers (don’t do this tech bro shitheads).

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Are they, or are they against GrapheneOS itself supporting it?

          Those are different. GrapheneOS exists to be security-hardened and usually should choose security over utility where there’s a conflict.

          • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            They arebgwnweally against root, as it “breaks security” in their mind.

            Nevermind that all systems, everywhere, have root for some account/some account is root.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Actually i have been thinking about it and i do believe that it should be done for computers, actually. Like, an attacker could super easily steal your login credentials when they get 10-15 minutes with your computer once. They could do that by booting a custom OS, modifying some of your operating system’s system files to install a keyboard tracker or sth, and then just wait for you to enter your password.

        I believe it’s actually why some banks i know don’t allow login anymore if you’re not using their Android apps to verify the login.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Secure boot for PCs has been a thing for a long time now. Many Linux distributions support it.

        • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yea, i know no bank that allows login in browser with only basic auth. All use some proprietary 2FA app with fancy QR codes (colour pixel or similar). Funnily, many banks then offer SMS based 2FA in order to restore…

          Like make hard and secure login but reset option is old SMS thingy spoofable since… ever?

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      At this point it’s like an unwritten rule of the internet that every GrapheneOS account comment chain will eventually regress into cooker conspiracy theories about other privacy ROM projects. And I still have no idea why Micay has started lumping iodé in with them, because I have been following that project closely for many years and no one there gives a shit about GrapheneOS. As in, they literally do not talk about Graphene (or any other projects, for that matter). They never compare themselves to GrapheneOS, on security or anything else. It’s the most bizarre, one-sided internet war.

      • darklamer@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And I still have no idea why Micay has started lumping iodé in with them, because I have been following that project closely for many years and no one there gives a shit about GrapheneOS.

        I don’t know, but it seems to me that you might have a rather good guess as to why right there.

        • Ilandar@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          As in, they literally do not talk about Graphene (or any other projects, for that matter).

          ???

    • pseud@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Namely,

      Having a European version of the Play Integrity which permits people to use insecure products from specific European companies participating in it while disallowing using arbitrary hardware or software is the opposite of a solution. It’s more of the same anti-competitive garbage.

      Hate to say it but he’s probably right.