As President Donald Trump warns Iran against using mines to threaten oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, the U.S. Navy’s purpose-built minesweepers are sitting stateside thousands of miles away with no plans to put them to use while the war rages on. As gas prices in the U.S. continued to skyrocket, Trump on Tuesday took to Truth Social to demand that Tehran “immediately” remove any mines placed in the vital seaway and to do so “forthwith” lest the Iranian military suffer “consequences … at a level never seen before.” That warning came after multiple news outlets reported Iran had begun mining the strait, a narrow waterway that is the only passage from the Persian Gulf into open ocean. He also threatened to use drone strikes to “permanently eliminate any boat or ship attempting to mine the Hormuz Strait” and boasted of having done so against 10 Iranian “inactive mine-laying boats” in a separate post several minutes later.

  • shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This guy is always stepping on rakes. Every decision he makes is stupid, choosing the wrong course consistently. It’s remarkable

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The goal is to put the US in disarray so that he can declare it’s too dangerous to have elections this November.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And whatever he does always somehow ends up helping Russia.

      They were struggling with gas prices being low and sanctions.

      Now he removed sanctions and blocked any other source of oil.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The problem is that he is so incompetent that Occam’s Razor dictates that’s most likely the reason. Watching legacy news is like gaslighting yourself because they hold so much water for him and paint him as an idiot savant. He spits out a bunch of random BS and they imbue it with meaning.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You seem to be under the mistaken impression that Trump wants this blockade and war to end. If that were the case, why would he have started it? The fact that we are stuck here is entirely the point. Do you REALLY think its an accident that the fourth largest producer of oil in the world accidentally started a war that simultaneously raised the price of oil AND blockaded the top three oil producers on earth?

      • fulcrummed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Immediately after directing a military incursion toppling the leadership in Venezuela; which sits on massive oil reserves which coincidentally, are of the variety American oil companies are equipped to refine.

    • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s what happens when you assume you’re always smarter than those so-called “experts”. You just take whatever they say is a good idea, and do the opposite. Works every time.

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Newsflash:

    The United States is one of the largest oil exporters on earth. They have exactly ZERO interest in reducing the price of oil.

    How are people not understanding that THIS is the exact intended outcome here?

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Some context from the end of the article:

    But Matthew Buckley, a former U.S. Naval aviator who spent considerable time serving in the Middle East region in the 1990s, told The Independent that the U.S. air campaign against Iran is likely executing long-held plans that would negate the need for the minesweepers by eliminating Iran’s ability to lay mines.

    “When I was flying combat sorties off to Abraham Lincoln in the mid 90s, you know, we were doing operation Southern Watch no fly zone missions over Iraq. And guess what we were doing during our downtime? We were strike planning Iran … and one of my big strikes that I had planned was against an Iranian mine facility deep in the middle of Iran,” he said.

    He added that the Avenger-class ships would not necessarily be readily available to clear any mines that might be laid because they’re “not built for a dynamic environment.”

    “Obviously the LCS does have its issues, but it does have a lot of weapons on board, and it is more designed for actual combat and littoral … mine sweeping,” he said.

    The mine sweepers in question are four decommissioned wood and fiberglass vessels from the Desert Storm era whose capabilities are being replaced by littoral (giggity) combat ships.

    It’s hard for me to believe that this operation wouldn’t include priority strikes on sea mine facilities. Just the specter of mines in the strait is enough to make shipping insurance infeasible. If Iran is successfully mining, what happened? Was this war so hastily planned that this was overlooked? If the strait is so vital to shipping, you’d think they would want every minesweeper available.

    If the US military (who are acutely aware of Trump’s openly hostile disrespect towards service members by the way) are actually listening to Trump’s logistical advice, he’s going to run them into the ground faster than his Vegas casinos.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      You think America, one of the largest oil producers in the world, really cares all that much that Saudi Arabia and Iraq can’t get their oil out? You realize they are making money on this, right? The US has no interest in opening the straight. Why do you think they started a war to close it?

      • how_we_burned@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not all oil and its child products are created equal.

        There are serious knock on effects occurring right now that we won’t see the impact of for a month or two as companies burn through their inventory

        Machine oils/lubricants, aviation fuels and of course fuel. Not to mention LNG, fertilisers and other petrochemical feedstock.

      • wuffah@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I did not realize that! Given how sensitive America voters are to gas prices, I guess they’re relying on voter suppression.

        Who exactly does benefit from closing the strait other than Iran?

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      What I read today is that Iran deployed twelve mines. Twelve.

      Presumably the US was striking their missile launches, and a couple more than twelve were launched… it’s consistent with all that that their ability to lay mines is heavily degraded.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, this seems like kind of a nothingburger. I get the desire to hit Trump on everything and anything, but you generally don’t put minesweepers in the middle of active combat zones.

      I’m also pretty confident that the rumours about Iran deploying mines aren’t even true, because if they are then their recent offer to allow safe passage doesn’t make any sense.

      Also, gotta love the LCS catching strays here. Canada has plenty of issues with ship-building, mostly thanks to our sourcing all the work to a monopoly corp that couldn’t give two shits, and even we look competent compared to the US navy’s steadily growing graveyard of failed projects.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The mining and safe passage make sense together. They’d deploy mines, then escort and/or pilot the ship through the unmined channel.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          I feel like that only works in a world where satellite and drone surveillance don’t exist. As soon as you escort one ship through the mines, they stop really being a threat because now everyone knows where the safe route is.

          I’m sure I could be wrong here, but either way I think we need to keep in mind that the mining is only rumoured at this point. Nothing is even close to confirmed and the evidence is pretty thin.

          Edit: OK, I’ve now seen somewhat more credible sources on the mine laying, so good chance I am wrong here. So it goes.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Sort of. Live, continuous satellite surveillance is a scarce resource, despite what TV might show you. And keeping a drone on station in hostile airspace is risky.

            Not to mention, some mines can be activated and deactivated by shore control.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Haha, Philly might be the one place on Earth that is more hostile to Trump than Iran…

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Oh I’m sure he’s going to permanently eliminate any boat or ship attempting to mine the Hormuz Strait.

    Of course, people who aren’t as old as the sun realize that drones can carry mines, so this threat is worth less than the paper it would take to print it out.