• lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They put a couple things behind the paywall of US$19.80/y: the ability to securely share files instead of just text, and to host TOTP authentication. As it is I prefer using other services for sharing, and while TOTP auth is nice I’m happy with Aegis.

      Edited to fix Bitwarden’s price obscurity

        • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          I use NextCloud for informal shares as its GUI is very similar Microsoft or Google’s -Drive and is easily adoptable. I also host a private pastebin instance for code or guides I think may be helpful, and Matrix for personal stuff. But I do like how Bitwarden/Vaultwarden’s share works – it feels more secure, like WeTransfer. It still has its applications. And Vaultwarden file share is free, size limit is adjustable in server config, and is not limited to what the Bitwarden clients say!

  • alakey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    While the increase is not a huge deal because the total is still cheaper than alternatives, the thing that irks me is how they did indeed just announce it via a blog post titled “Bitwarden launches enhanced premium plan: Complete online security for everyone”. This reads like there’s going to be free, premium and premium+ at best, and “we are just adding more stuff to the premium” at worst, not implying a price bump, at least to me. I did not get my renewal email yet, so can’t confirm whether or not they don’t even mention the annual price, but rather just the monthly one. Another thing that kind of bothers me is that they list “Vault health alerts” as a new thing, while it’s always been there. While “Phishing blocker” just seems like a feature outside of the scope of a password manager.

    All in all, double the price in exchange for x5 more storage and x2 more hardware keys is fine to me, but I hope they improve their communication and actually properly inform users of upcoming pricing changes.

    • 0485@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had my renewal email come through today. Here is what is says: Your Bitwarden Premium subscription renews in 15 days. The price is updating to $1.65/month, billed annually. As an existing Bitwarden customer, you will receive a one-time 25% loyalty discount for this year’s renewal. This renewal will now be billed annually at $14.85 + tax.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Interesting. I also had mine come through but it had a different message:

        Your Bitwarden Families subscription renews in 15 days. The price is updating to $3.99/month, billed annually.

        Questions? Contact support@bitwarden.com

        It seems there’s a few variants of the message depending on which product you have and not all of them mention the annual price.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the one I got too.

        Just note if your company uses Bitwarden enterprise, you’re eligible for a free personal license. (Unless they changed that)

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wish they handled it better, but I knew about this a while ago, and the price is more than reasonable.

    A decade without a price hike is extremely generous, especially at how cheap their plan was.

    They are a FOSS company that makes a fantastic product I’ve been happy with for years, I’ll gladly pay less than $2 a month to support them. Their server code is licensed with the AGPL, the strongest copyleft license there is, which gives me a lot of confidence.

    Worse case scenario, they enshitify down the road, we are protected via the open source implementations. We’ve seen this many times in the past, Red Hat > Alma & Rocky Linux, Citrix Xen Server > XCP-ng, Terraform > Open Tofu.

    Pay for your open source software, folks 💖

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      Paying for good software should be normalized again. One way or the other you’ll always pay. If you don’t pay with your money, you pay with your data.

  • quaff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lol for years I have been wanting to switch from KeePass to Bitwarden. Mainly cause the UX/UI felt nice to me.

    My initial hesitance was that I didn’t love the idea of my passwords being on someone else’s servers. But I found out about Vaultwarden. So I kept my eye on it’s development and longevity. Now that it’s well established, I’d say I trust it now. Next I figured out a way to selfhost without exposing Vaultwarden to the public. Everything seems to be lined up for me to switch.

    A few months ago, I decided it was time. After moving my passwords over and getting a flow working, I went to sort by most recent… Oh wait. You can’t sort by date. You can’t sort lol I sat with this for a few hours and reverted back to my trusted and working KeePass flow.

    EDIT: This is one of the most voted feature requests. Also, it’s just table stakes! It’s crazy they don’t have this feature 😂

    https://community.bitwarden.com/t/sorting-options-by-date-of-modification-addition-last-use-etc/2484

      • quaff@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can’t fathom why someone would want to… sort a list…?

        I don’t know how to answer this. I think you’re serious, but I can’t tell. Want to read that community post I linked where over 600+ people voted for the sorting ability?

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    TBH, $10/year is a small price not to have to get my wife to change again after lastpass. She is not equipped to deal with enshittification.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you do any sort of self-hosting, take a look at Vaultwarden. All the premium functions for free.

      Before my entire network setup changed recently for unrelated reasons… I had Vaultwarden running on my home server (TrueNAS) and a free Cloudflare account with a tunnel to my home server and a $5/year domain. Worked for my parents easily and no longer had to worry about the big infrastructure being targeted.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Possibly but the main thing we find useful is the OTP generation. This means we can both use shared accounts without having to ask the other for a code. That’s probably an edge case, and not enough sites support it, but it’s really nice for the ones that do.

        I doubt that is available in self-hosting but I’d be happy to be wrong about that. I have a raspberry pi serving up a couple of local things and I could register a domain if I had a use case for connectivity outside the house.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That is totally available self hosted. Nothing is blocked. In fact that’s why I originally switched, reducing unnecessary monthly costs.

          OTP codes for websites as well as all the MFA options for Vaultwarden itself. It also supports organizations, so you can share info between multiple accounts on your server. Emergency access, and even a web vault client.

          Everything the paid Bitwarden does as far as I’m aware.

          https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden

            • Prinz Kasper@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Worth pointing out that Vaultwarden refuses service when you connect to it without HTTPS, meaning wherever you host it you also need to set up some way of providing it with SSL certificates. As a newbie to self-hosting myself, this has tripped me up quite a bit.

  • uuj8za@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, not handled well. They’re doing slimy corpo bullshit.

    On the other hand, I like that they’re open source and don’t block stuff like vaultwarden.

    I hope they can take the extra money and make the product better. Cuz I definitely don’t love Bitwarden, but it’s a better alternative than 1Password.

  • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The link is from February 1st, about a blog post in January. I clicked here thinking Bitwarden just raised their subscription price again haha.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    free tier is totally fine for 99% of people. if i want a cloud, i pay for a cloud. hike was totally forseeable. its an ass move tho to birry info in a blogpost noone ever read.

  • Ransack3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wasn’t this announced months ago? I know I heard something about it, probably on here even. Either way 20$ a year for Bitwarden is still well worth it.

  • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lawl I pay for the yearly thing and I’ve never used any paid features, I just wanted to support them. I’m okay with the price increase, but it definitely would have been nice to have an announcement maybe in December or spending the they’re planning that. I wonder if I’m grandfathered into the same price I’ve been paying? Ehhh too lazy to find out. I’ll pay 20, but yah some transparency or forewarning would have been nice for a lot of peeps.

    • 0485@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sadly you’re not grandfathered. You’ll get a 25% discount for the first year if you’re already a paying customer.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, it includes things like a TOTP manager, text file storage, family sharing, etc… Nothing super groundbreaking, but it’s some quality of life stuff that plenty of people have been happy to pay less than a dollar per month for.

    • 0485@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not about the price itself. It’s about the lack of transparency. Not being open with a 100% increase is not a good look.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I kept procrastinating on self hosting it, but now i will do it tonight and migrate to my own instance.

    Problem solved.

  • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah…they’ve been making a lot of changes to the client, too. I’m not sure what form it will take yet, because idk enough about bitwarden as a company, but get ready for enshittification and forks.