• Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I feel like all shapes and sizes are good. That also includes the potential of humanoid shapes if needed. The design should be based off what it’s meant to do. Humanoid like shapes would be best for things that are involving human interaction, and something that needs a diverse amount of tasks, but those types of shapes would also be the hardest to do and the most expensive. It would make sense to minimize cost and complexity as long as it isn’t making a compromise elsewhere.

  • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    All shapes and sizes, but the smaller and more efficient the better.

    Humanoid robots are stupid and wasteful.

  • DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’d like them to be utilitarian, optimized for the tasks they are made to perform. And simple, as in easily fixable by the owner (right to repair).