• Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    4 months ago

    They knew how to do this in the 80s. Little Shop of Horrors, The Fly, and The Thing for example. All remakes that far surpassed the cheesy originals.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    The best example is The Thing. The original film in the 1950s was awkward af. But the 1980s remake by John Carpenter was chef’s kiss. Then they made a remake of a remake and it was meh.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      The 2011 The Thing wasn’t so much a remake as it was a prequel to the remake, telling the story from the Norwegian scientists’ camp.

      The 1982 John Carpenter remake opened with the last two remaining Norwegian scientists chasing “The Thing” until it reaches the Americans’ camp. But they’re misunderstood by the Americans. When trying to shoot at The Thing, which has taken the shape of a sled dog, the Americans instead return fire and kill them. Then the Americans explore the Norwegian camp and try to figure out what horrors killed everyone there, while slowly discovering why they were shooting at a dog in the first place.

      The 2011 film shows what happened to the Norwegians before the 1982 remake. You’re correct, it wasn’t as great of a film (hard to compete with John Carpenter), but it wasn’t exactly a remake.

      • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The worst thing about the 2011 prequel is they had filmed the whole movie with practical effects, like the Carpenter movie, which is one of my favorites of all time. If you’ve seen it, you may remember very little of these and a lot of cgi.

        The studio or production company or whatever didn’t like the practical effects and we got cgi Thing instead. I’d love to see the original effects, and I feel so bad for the people who worked so hard on it just to get scrubbed from the final cut.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        It was a weird combination of remake and prequel. It hit all the same story points and barely added anything new apart from Tetris aliens.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      You scared me for a second, being only aware of the 80s one I thought you wanted a remake of that lol

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Today we see it that way but in the 70s and 80s, the 1950s Thing was hailed as a classic prestige science fiction film. That’s why Carpenter’s version was trashed at the time. It was dismissed as a grotesque barf bag SFX spectacle that completely disregarded what made the original so good.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 months ago

    On a vaguely related note, why aren’t we making more movies that take a Shakespeare plot and just stuff it in a different setting without trying to hide it? Like 10 Things I Hate about you was Taming of the Shrew.

    Tell me you wouldn’t watch Mechbeth.

  • Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Or maybe, just maybe do a new franchise or movie. I’m so tired of going to the cinema and watching the trailers for 9 ouf of the 10 comming up movies being sequals or reboots of old franchises.

    • daddycool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If they can’t even make a good sequal or reboot of an old successful franchise, how do you expect them to make a good movie/franchise from scratch?

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Theyre all the same anyways. There hasnt been a unique story in hundreds/thousands of years. Its all the same plots with different characters in different environments.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think it’s because the way the advertise movies now is terrible. Go look at trailers of the past and it’s always “in a world gone mad only one man can stop the terrorists from blowing up New York” yeah I know it’s cheesy but at least I know what the movies about. These days it’s 300 cuts per minute and now it’s anyone’s guess what genre it is.

        Downsizing is the quintessential example of the switch and bait of modern trailers. What an incredibly boring movie that was.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Movie mash-ups.

    Back to the Future and Tron.

    Blade Runner and Hawaii 5-0

    Truman and Silo.

    Mrs. Doubtfire and John Wick.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Dear AI, please upscale this image, but also try to make tons of subtle changes that completely ruin the vibe. Do it in a way that makes it clear that you’ve been trained on lots of images from The Simpsons, but have no idea what the fuck is going on in any of them.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I kinda think Event Horizon had a phenomenal concept, but had a C+ execution. If there’s a movie I think needs a remake, it’s that.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I love the movie, but it could definitely be done better with some modern touches to the effects and script.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        as soon as they add modern politics, without any resolution or is so seperated from the actual plot the movie/show will be bad.

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s have multiple reboots going at the same time. I think it would be great to have like three reboots of Jurassic Park going at the same time with different directors. I want to see a full length Wes Anderson take on the film, but also a Zach Snyder take and maybe a Danny Boyle take competing on the same weekend.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Doesn’t that pretty much describe DC? At one point, they ha Juaquin Phoenix Joker, DCEU, and the Robert Pattinson Batman all kinda overlapping.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Disney’s been trying. ‘Once More With Feeling’ is a whole podcast about the reboots. Did you know Disney remade Pete’s Dragon and The Shaggy Dog? I didn’t.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, there was the “We want to keep the rights” movie from the… 90s, I think? Then the two with Jessica Alba, then Fantfourstick, then the MCU version. So, yeah, five by my count.