The Israeli Ministry of Defense and the IDF notified the UN just before midnight local time that Palestinians living north of Wadi Gaza should evacuate to the southern part of the Gaza Strip in the next 24 hours, according to UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric and another source with direct knowledge.

The big picture: More than 1 million Palestinians live in this area. The message could be a signal that the Israeli military is preparing for an imminent ground operation.

The sources told Axios that the IDF's reason for the notification was in order for civilians not to be hurt by the military's actions and operations.
More than 1,530 Palestinians and 1,200 Israelis have been killed, thousands have been injured, and hundreds of thousands of others have been displaced since the latest fighting between Israel and Hamas began. Hamas is believed to be holding about 150 hostages in Gaza.

Driving the news: The Israeli military has carried out a heavy bombardment of Gaza since Hamas militants attacked Israel on Saturday.

It's also imposed a "complete siege" on the enclave, which is home to more than 2 million Palestinians. 

What they’re saying: The IDF said in an announcement to Gaza City residents that they should all evacuate and move south of Wadi Gaza.

It will "continue to operate significantly in Gaza City" in the coming days and Israeli forces will "make extensive efforts to avoid harming civilians," the IDF said.
"You will be able to return to Gaza only when another announcement permitting it is made," the IDF said.
The IDF urged residents to distance themselves from Hamas, which it said was using them as human shields.
It warned civilians not to approach the area of a security fence with Israel because it said Hamas militants were hiding in tunnels "underneath homes and buildings and populated with innocent Gazan civilians."

Meanwhile, Dujarric told Axios: "Today, just before midnight local time, team leaders of the UN Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the Department of Safety and Security in Gaza were informed by their liaison officers in the Israeli military that the entire population of Gaza north of Wadi Gaza should relocate to southern Gaza within the next 24 hours.

"This amounts to approximately 1.1 million people. The same order applied to all UN staff and those sheltered in UN facilities – including schools, health centers and clinics," Dujarric said.
"The United Nations considers it impossible for such a movement to take place without devastating humanitarian consequences," Dujarric added. 

"The United Nations strongly appeals for any such order, if confirmed, to be rescinded avoiding what could transform what is already a tragedy into a calamitous situation."

State of play: UN Secretary-General António Guterres spoke twice on Thursday night with Israeli Ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan and said he wants to get clarification at the highest political level about Israel’s request to evacuate the population from the northern Gaza strip, a UN source said.

Erdan in a statement called the "UN's response to Israel's early warning to the residents of Gaza is shameful!"
"For many years, the UN has turned a blind eye to the arming of Hamas and its use of the civilian population and civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip as a hiding place for its weapons and murder," Erdan said.
"Now, instead of standing by Israel, whose citizens were slaughtered by Hamas terrorists and who tries to minimize harm to those not involved, it preaches to Israel. It is better for the UN to focus now on returning the hostages, condemning Hamas, and supporting Israel's right to defend itself," he said. 
  • Mrkawfee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is what happens when you give countries like Israel a pass . They just take it as a green light to massacre civilians

    • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the approach that will minimize civilian casualties. Forcing Hamas to move will diminish their ability to hide behind civilians like they have been doing. Doing so on short notice will prevent them from moving their weapons, as all of the tunnels have been obliterated in the past couple days.

      • vind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can’t evacuate 1 million people in 24 hours, much less when they don’t have anywhere to go. Gaza is fully blockaded and they can’t leave.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s over a million people, in one of the densest areas of earth, without public transport, petrol, electricity, water and means of mass communication. In addition to that, all border crossings are closed, and there’s not exactly 1 million+ empty houses in the rest of Gaza.

            They’re deliberately giving an impossible ultimatum to justify scores of civilian deaths before the fact.

      • jackoneill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We read the article too bro. The thing is it’s an impossible request and they know it. They are just saying it to look good to absolute morons like you

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, the approach that would minimise civilian casualties is to just not mass bomb a city.

        Like even if they COULD evacuate, you think the Hams fighters wouldn’t just go with them?

        This does nothing but give Israel a free pass to commit mass murder because they gave prior warning.

  • oroboros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    You will be able to return to Gaza only when another announcement permitting it is made

    So maybe never then?

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You will be able to return to Gaza only when another announcement permitting it is made,” the IDF said.

    Anyone want to bet on whether this will be before or after the Israeli settlers arrive?
    What Hamas did is horrific and should not be tolerated. At the same time, Israel is not blameless either, they have been engaging in acts which amount to cultural genocide for a long time. Israel using this war as a casus belli to engage in further settlement expansion would not surprise me at all. Like most wars, this whole situation is shit all over and lots of innocent people are going to die during the dick swinging of the powerful few.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel had settlers in Gaza before 2005. They were forcibly evicted as part of an effort to help establish Gaza as a valid independent state.

      Gazans then elected Hamas and started lobbing rockets at Israel.

      • TheDankHold@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And now that Israel is looking for a reason to wipe Gaza off the map there won’t be an issue sending in settlers.

        The long game of funding extremist orgs is paying off for right wingers in Israel.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll wait to get angry about things if they actually happen.

          If Israel really wanted Gaza wiped off the map with no regard to civilian casualties, it would already be gone. I certainly would like to see significantly more restraint though.

          • TheDankHold@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It would be gone if Israel didn’t care about the geopolitical pr associated with such an action. Now that right wingers have funded and egged on the extremists enough, the militants are giving the war mongers in the Israeli government the perfect causus belli to get the result they want while posturing as the good guys.

            This isn’t even a modern tactic. Rome got the Samnites to declare war in the 400s BC by setting up settler colonies in Samnite territory then rushing in to defend their citizens when Samnite warriors went to defend their territory.

            Much like Rome, right wing Israeli politicians are bloodthirsty expansionists while still having the sociopathic gall to hide their barbarism behind decorum.

    • buzziebee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel removed all the settlers from the strip, why would they put them back in? Can we wait until they actually do things before throwing out wild accusations? There’s enough stuff to criticise already without making stuff up and getting upset about it.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    UN:

    “This amounts to approximately 1.1 million people. The same order applied to all UN staff and those sheltered in UN facilities – including schools, health centers and clinics,” Dujarric said.

    “The United Nations considers it impossible for such a movement to take place without devastating humanitarian consequences,” Dujarric added.

    “The United Nations strongly appeals for any such order, if confirmed, to be rescinded avoiding what could transform what is already a tragedy into a calamitous situation.”

    And Israel’s response:

    Erdan in a statement called the “UN’s response to Israel’s early warning to the residents of Gaza is shameful!”

    “For many years, the UN has turned a blind eye to the arming of Hamas and its use of the civilian population and civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip as a hiding place for its weapons and murder,” Erdan said.

    “Now, instead of standing by Israel, whose citizens were slaughtered by Hamas terrorists and who tries to minimize harm to those not involved, it preaches to Israel. It is better for the UN to focus now on returning the hostages, condemning Hamas, and supporting Israel’s right to defend itself,” he said.

    Holy shit dude…they’re worried about getting their staff out, Jesus fucking Christ.

    • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they make nukes small enough to only get the northern half of a city, without also getting the southern half, and everything else around the city for a decent radius.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d be surprised how how small some backpack nukes can be. The smallest the US ever put into service could have its yield set to as low as 10 tons of TNT. Which would still be big by conventional means, but would be smaller than the conventional MOAB

        • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s pretty wild.

          What’s even the point of using a nuke at that point? Are they somehow cheaper to produce than conventional bombs of a similar scale? Even if you just want some fallout, you can use a dirty bomb or something, no?

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most nuclear weapons made after ww2 were “variable yield” so you could select how big the explosion you want. And the weapon I mentioned was 10 tons at its smallest but 10k tons at its biggest.

            And the Moab with and 11 ton yield is a Biiig mother fucker that can’t even be carried by bombers, only transport aircraft like a C-130. Whereas the nuke can be carried by a single person, fired from a 155mm modified howitzer or fired on top of an air to air missle.

      • sugarfree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas terrorists have long been safe and secure in Gaza without any pushback from residents. It’s time for them to reap the rewards of their support. If they still stand by Hamas, so be it.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’d like to see you push back to a local militia that holds all the power in your area, without the option of leaving.

          They weren’t democratically elected, in fact Israel funded their rise to power and undermined the elected government.

        • sudneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          IDF soldiers have long been safe and secure in Israel without any pushback from residents. It’s time for them to reap the rewards of their support. If they still stand by the IDF, so be it.

          This is your alter ego from across the border speaking.