22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet::The Kids Online Safety Act is “a blank check” for Republican AGs to “intimidate any way they can,” a digital civil liberties advocate told Jezebel.

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t this fall under first ammendment rights at that point? You can’t block discussion and sharing of information online without violating the right to free speech.

    Not that these fascists care…

    • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are no rights unless they are backed by the threat of violent revolution.

      Who’s gonna save you? The Supreme Court?

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 years ago

          I would argue most of internet is already being censored… probably for good reasons.

            • Siegfried@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              You are right, most of it is probably to keep people in power and the servants in line, but there are also a lot of situations in which we actively ask for censorship. Moderators are needed for a reason. Censorship is our only relatively effective tool to counter disinformation campaigns and fake news. Even search engines censor their results either to avoid lawsuits or to prevent certain situations, like someone asking for suicide methods is redirected to sites telling him why life is worth it.

              I still understand this is a double edged sword and im not sure if the risks involved with compulsory censorship are worth losing our internet freedom, but I do understand this shit is needed on certain situations

            • floppade [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              In a literal level, this person is not being unreasonable. Facebook moderators and the psychological conditions they face as a result of their work are a good indication of that.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      Now imagine if they used the law to force Google not to provide any results in a search for abortion. While it may not remove content from the Internet, it effectively removes access to it.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This shows we need an open source search engine that anybody can whip up. To all the devs and volunteers out there, please make something like this, if there’s one already, I’ll see if I can contribute to the project.

        • floppade [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          In the meantime, you can use something like ProtonVPN to make sites think you’re not in the US. Google uses your IP address to determine your location and implement regulations based on that. You get better privacy options when it thinks you’re in Europe too.

    • scottywh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      You say that but the internet of today is a far more “sanitized” place than it once was.

    • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lol, this is very doable and happens in the western world all the time.

      Even propaganda is rampant here.

      Maybe it’s not gone, but it might as well be if 98% of the population can’t find it.

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    LGBTQ rights activists were complaining about this already, and people didn’t listen. Using a more highly motivating issue like abortion is sadly necessary to get people to care. It could censor so many important issues, it’s a travesty it’s gotten this far.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is violently anti-intellectual freedom.

    Factual information doesn’t “harm children.” If your kid isn’t ready to learn about the world, it’s your job to do some parenting.

    The fact that these AGs won’t be using a bill like this to remove right wing propaganda from the internet tells you this is just a censorship tool, at best.

  • FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Slowly and slowly, it feels like parents are having less and less responsibility—and therefore control—over their children’s lives. Information is not a problem—if there’s something the parent doesn’t want the kid to see it up to them to enforce that, not the government.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its cause a lot of parents don’t want responsibility.

      They want teachers and tablets and cellphones to raise the kids, not themselves.

      We should be cracking down on shitty parents, not passing censorship laws that will be grossly misused by the obvious actors.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    We want to force the entire world to block information that we don’t like (says the small government club)

    Good luck with that

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    2 years ago

    I firmly believe abortion is a sin. However, I don’t see why each party is fighting so hard for it. Just leave it up to the states.

    Also this is goes to show that dystopian laws aren’t political