Josh Paul, who said he has worked in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs for more than 11 years, said in his LinkedIn post that he resigned “due to a policy disagreement concerning our continued lethal assistance to Israel.”

“Let me be clear,” Paul wrote. “Hamas’ attack on Israel was not just a monstrosity; it was a monstrosity of monstrosities. I also believe that potential escalations by Iran-linked groups such as Hezbollah, or by Iran itself, would be a further cynical exploitation of the existing tragedy. But I believe to the core of my soul that the response Israel is taking, and with it the American support both for that response, and for the status quo of the occupation, will only lead to more and deeper suffering for both the Israeli and the Palestinian people – and is not in the long term American interest.”

“This Administration’s response – and much of Congress’ as well – is an impulsive reaction built on confirmation bias, political convenience, intellectual bankruptcy, and bureaucratic inertia,” Paul adds. “That is to say, it is immensely disappointing, and entirely unsurprising. Decades of the same approach have shown that security for peace leads to neither security, nor to peace. The fact is, blind support for one side is destructive in the long term to the interests of the people on both sides.”

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thank you this needed to be said and fuck Biden administration for taking sides and not only that he NOW going use OUR tax dollars to help Israel commit genocide. Fuck him hate his fucking guts. We should of had Sanders for president he would find the right thing to do.

    • SeedyOne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plenty to dislike about Biden but this one existed LONG before him and is a lot more complex than “current admin bad”.

      Even this person leaving their position admits it’s been this way for decades and is wholly unsurprising, albeit incredibly disappointing.

        • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah? Please explain your understanding of this situation and then follow up with what options he had.

          Please.

          • unwellsnail@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Not the commenter you asked, but my understanding of this situation is that in response to a Hamas attack on the 7th Israel has, for the past week and a half, been bombing a captive population that is currently without electricity, water, food and medical supplies, and our government is supporting that.

            What Biden could do, now, is say “Hey, we understand your fear and pain, but Palestinian deaths won’t brings back those Israeli lives. Mass killing of civilians in the hopes of killing some of the people responsible won’t bring peace, trust me we’ve tried too.” From there he can engage in discussions about next steps, but this is the minimum fucking first step he refuses to take.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            He had the option of forcing Israel to sit down at the table with Palestine and hammer out a deal for peace.

            I don’t personally like forcing anyone but the world is at a point now where, in this singular case, force is required.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              When did he have that option? Neither side has any interest in speaking

            • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I was talking to this commenter who apparently is White House level briefed on Bidens options he had.

              But if you’d like to also participate that’s cool too but that wasn’t my question.

              What were his all of his choices that he had since were feigning to know so much about all the choices he had as armchair forum political experts again.

              You claim that Biden could just make Israel come to a meeting somehow? Please explain how that would’ve been accomplished and explain why that would’ve worked with minimal or negligible side effects. If your proposal does contain noticeable side effects, make sure to bring those up as well

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      FWIW, this isn’t a “now” problem, it’s been the US position for a long time. Still shitty though.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      He said the quiet part out loud.

      It’s people like this that should be in positions of power.