• iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    as a parent, I would say what matters is geo-location and text to coordinate pick-up or plans. there is no need for younger kids to have a full fledged phone if one could be developed that serves those functions. I’m thinking 90s flip phones with GPS. It really sounds like a gold mine for some company to supply these limited devices given the market for them.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 days ago

      Someone is downvoting everything but I agree. I try and keep my helicopter parent impulses under control, but it is nice to know exactly where my kids are. My son (12) has a locked down old iPhone and Apple makes it pretty easy to make it practically a dumb phone. We literally have it set up so that he has to ask for permission before using any apps, with the exception of calling and messaging. (Even messaging is iffy; we want to be able to text him but it opens up texting with friends.) He doesn’t need it at school so he doesn’t bring it, but as he gets older, I’m sure it’ll start to go with him and I’m not upset about it. If he wants to go somewhere with a friend right after school instead of going straight home, it’s fine with me as long as I know about it. Without a phone, it’d be hard for him to make such plans on the fly, and let’s just say that planning ahead isn’t my ADHD-kid’s strong suit (yet—we’re working on it). As long as the expectation is set that he doesn’t use it during school, I think that’s okay; it can just live in his backpack until school is over.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Someone is downvoting everything

        Indeed - three top level posts got downvotes from the same two accounts (with the second likely being an alt) within a minute.

      • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        What’s wrong with a 12 year old texting their friends? I had unfettered internet access by then and I turned out fine.

        • mig@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          Good question, if you’ve turned out already you did not grow up with the intense constant social media environment. I haven’t seen anyone mention kids filming each other in school with the associated prank culture and social judgements. Remove that from the learning environment.

          Texting is not the problem, it’s addictive apps and the fact that they are filming and posting each others childhoods. I’m too old to understand how that can be made right.

          I actually have hope gen z and gen alpha will have constructive ideas how to moderate these forces while retaining what is beneficial, like connection to friends (texting).

        • proudblond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          Oh, nothing inherently wrong, but we’ve already had a couple of incidents of bad behavior. My kid got mad about something and sent some angry messages to a group chat that included racial slurs. It was a big learning experience to say the least (for all of us). Since then they’ve learned to unsend their messages, it seems, so while I can say my kiddo learned something, I have to hope that he also learned the things I needed him to learn. Being a parent is so much fun!

    • Zephorah@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      There are options for that. Like Gabb phones and such. No Internet or social media mostly just talk, text, and geolocation.

      • iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’m completely ignorant of “Gabb” phones. I’ll have to investigate. Also, I should probably add that while I’m a parent my kids are now grown so my opinions on this are dated. They all have full fledged smartphones at this point… and jobs… and lives. LOL

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      No kid wants that.

      Ban the phones and make the kids do as we always did. Hide it and use it strategically when the teacher couldn’t see.

      • iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        thats fair, but of course its not the kids who are buying them.
        Flip side is that kids are resourceful - given a dumbed down device that is only supposed to be able to do texting, it wouldn’t be a month before every one of them was running custom firmware to connect to fully encrypted peer to peer social networks run by kids with audio alerts set at a frequency that adults can’t hear and multiplayer games LOL.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    My position on this is really weird because I’m in support of laptops being in classrooms for educational uses. However, I’m against cell phones being in classroom.

    That being said, as someone who grew up in a school system that didn’t allow the parent to communicate with their child or a teenager, meaning that they couldn’t call the school to have them relay a message, I am firmly against a straight ban period on school grounds. I was given a phone because my parents’ work schedule was very fluid and could change within an hour or two. And on more than a handful of occasions, my mom would call the school and be like, hey, you need to relay the message to get on a different bus because there’s no one going to be home, And they just wouldn’t relay it. It also helped if I chose to go to a friends house after school

    I’m also disliking how they skewed the results. If you read the actual study, you’ll see that they merged the kind of agree strongly agree and the kind of disagree strongly disagree categories to make it a binary choice, but then chose to omit the six percent of the people who said they didn’t care or had no strong opinion.

    they also removed any results where the person chose the first option or the last option on every question. And I dislike any type of automated data sanitation method like that, because while they did randomize the first and fourth answer, every time, there’s always the possibility that someone legitimately answered everything as either the first or last answer. My own vote could be stated that since I strongly agree that the cell phone shouldn’t be in the classroom, but strongly disagree that it should be straight banned. So if question one and question two had the polarity of question one and question 2 flipped, where one was strongly agree and one was strongly disagree, it’s entirely possible I would have been removed from the survey as a fraudulent result.

    edit: removed couple sentences that drifted from topic some and fixed a repeated line

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Imagine a world where teachers weren’t geriatric and taught their kids digital literacy instead of digital luddism.

    I mean, shit, homework was invented as a fucking punishment and so many studies have shown it has diminishing returns after a certain age. Yet here we are, perpetuating a system designed explicitly for controlling kids - not teaching them.

    But yeah, phones are the problem. The internet is the problem. Definitely not how kids are taught to interact with them, no sir. While we’re at it, just get rid of PCs at the school - that way the district can save money on their IT department. They can access social media from the PCs so I don’t see the problem.

    • heh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      It’s tough.

      Kids are going to use their phones for random bullshit in class no matter what if they are allowed, but phones in general can be a fantastic learning tool used in the classroom.

      I wonder if we might eventually see schools distribute phones like they do laptops, even though that in itself is rare. It would allow the school to lock them down during school hours. Maybe include some option to buy out the phone/number when a student leaves.

      A common complaint of not allowing phones is that students can’t contact their parents quickly in an emergency or vice versa. A locked down phone with “emergency contacts” fixes that issue.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Y’all need to go read /r/teachers to learn what a scourge phones in classrooms are. The teachers are begging for an outright ban.

    • Vitaly_Chernobyl@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      That subreddit paints a realistic picture of what it’s like being a teacher, but I find it overly negative. While there are a myriad of reasons why education in the U.S. is in a bad place, there are also a lot of fulfilling and heartwarming moments to being a teacher that don’t get brought up over there.

  • BandDad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 days ago

    I live and teach in a state that implemented a ban. Results after year one were marginal improvement. Many just did the “hiding” trick more than before. A number didn’t think we’d notice them hunched over whispering to their watches. It was rather comical when they would do that.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Can we just ban them in general? We used to be a proper society and had our phones on the kitchen walls with 25ft cords.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      Back in the good old days when homosexuality was a felony, the cure for autism was an ice pick lobotomy, and certain people would be killed for being caught in nice neighborhoods? Proper society.

      • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Jesus, show us on the doll where the bad man hurt you why don’t you. Can we not have a joke about anything benign these days without someone coming along to make it about the wrongs of society? And before you say it, yes, the things you mentioned were wrong.

        Chill out, I wasn’t making a statement about race relations, intolerance, bigotry, or medical ignorance. It was just a joke about long phone cords.

        You must be a miserable bastard to spend much time around if this is how to react to such things in real life as well.

  • Vitaly_Chernobyl@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    I teach middle school in a state with a cell phone ban. We had our first year with the phone ban last year, and I thought it was an improvement.

    Phones can be very detrimental to the school experience. For one, it is very difficult to teach kids who are already unwilling or resistant to learning while they have a piece of technology they are literally addicted to in their hand. Secondly, phones and social media contribute to a lot to the bullying, violence, and general misbehavior that occurs at schools.

    My school district also provides all students with an iPad, so they have their own school-provided tech. In my experience, this comes with their own problems though. I often feel like I am playing “whack-a-mole” keeping kids off their iPads (playing games, etc.) during instruction. It’s nice to be able to incorporate technology into lessons, and it definitely is more convenient for teaching, but I don’t think the trade off is worth it. For example, the cheating with A.I. was off the charts for me last year.

    This coming school year, I am looking to incorporate more paper and pencil assignments into my teaching. A lot of my students seem to favor assignments where they aren’t using their iPads. I think most agree that these kids’ eyeballs need a break from the screens.

    Also, to people with concerns about the phone ban, students are allowed to bring their phone to school. My state’s law states that the phone must be turned off and in the student’s backpack during instructional hours. Students may be on their phone at school before and after classes start. In the event of an emergency, no one is going to care if the students get their phone out their bag to call their adult. So, kids will retain access to their phone. In fact, most of the students carry their phones around in the pocket and none of the teachers generally care as long as the student isn’t blatantly using their phone during class time. If a kid is caught using their phone during class time, they have to turn it in to the main office for the remainder of the day will escalating consequences for repeat offenses.

    Also, I’m sure it varies from teacher to teacher, but I am very understanding when a kid needs to contact a parent/guardian. I will always allow my students to use the phone in my classroom, call a parent from the main office, or use their cell phone in the hall as long as the kid asks permission and explains the situation.

    • Ugandan Airways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      How long have you been a teacher? Just curious. I agree with your points, and they also make me glad I left the profession after 15 years. I taught internationally and in both private and public schools in the US, and cell phones were a scourge at all of them. AI is the bigger issue in my opinion, and I’m super happy I quit right when it was taking off. Teaching is becoming more and more pointless, and everyone is getting passed along, etc. There needs to be an overhaul on standards to become an administrator and teachers should be required to have masters degrees. I couldn’t believe how many teachers I worked with who weren’t curious about anything—didn’t read, didn’t study, and were not that intelligent. In fact, it got to a point where I just left the profession, and life has been infinitely better since.

      • Vitaly_Chernobyl@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        This will be my 6th year working in education.

        I agree teaching often feels totally pointless. I have to remind myself, as a teacher in a low-socioeconomic status school, that I could very well be one of the most responsible and accessible adults in some of these kids lives and take solace in that. I try to at the very least be a positive male role model (the boys need one) for my students even if they aren’t necessarily always learning the content I’m trying to teach them.

        I totally agree on your last point as well. The standards to be a teacher are way too low. I work with several adults that should never be allowed to be responsible for educating children. Those people make all the rest of us look bad.

  • kevinsky@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Was this never a thing in the US previously?

    I distinctly remember from my school days (Western EU) mobile phones were to remain off and in backpacks.

    And those were still the days we you just had this relatively dumb flipphone that could litterally only call and text and if you were lucky had a potato camera as it’s main novelty.

    There was no access to internet, much less AI’s that can do your entire homework for you and they were already annoying to deal with for a teacher. Can’t imagine how that is now.

    • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Yeah, when I was a kid growing up in the US, no cell phones during class was the standard. If you took it out (or if it wasn’t on silent and rang during class) you got a warning, then next time it would be taken away and given back at the end of class or end of the school day with escalating consequences for repeated violations.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    The logic is stupid. There are adults that are just as addicted to social media and the Internet as much as any kid would be. What changes once they reach 18?

    more ranting

    The real issue isn’t being tackled or solved. This is yet another thing where we’re trying to solve the symptom but not the cause. The real issue is that the software or the platforms don’t take into consideration, by design, the well-being of the user.

    We’re being forced to do what these stupid corporations like Meta, Google, Reddit, OpenAI et al aren’t doing already but should actually be doing. They don’t give AF because their whole objective is to make sure you are addicted and they can then harvest your data, feed you scams, etc.

    This is pretty much like how the big corporations push the blame on the consumer for wasting plastic even though it’s the fucking corps choosing to sell their products that way in the fist place.

    If software was designed with a kill-switch that could enforce better habits, this all wouldn’t be necessary. All we’re doing is delaying the inevitable and forcing them to seek alternatives that will be abused in the same manor social media or the Internet would be.

    Why the fuck do they still sell cigarettes despite everybody knowing full well that it causes severe health issues?!

    Can’t make this shit up!!!

    P.S. - If the schools wish to put in place this kind of ban, then they have the authority to do so. Fine. That doesn’t fix the broken education system. Yes, it is broken.

    • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I mean, I would vastly prefer your solution, but it’s much more difficult to step in and police every social media company such that they aren’t working against the user. This is basically a band aid, but a band aid is better than nothing imo

  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    I mean, are phones conducive to learning? If not then forbid their usage at school and bloody enforce it. I think the fact phones became common place for kids so quickly and so early in their lives coupled with just the general insanity of American schools so often being under attack, the schools have just lost any agency to restrict them given their usage is already rampant.

    • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      Nope. As a dad I want to be able to reach my kid when need to and I want her to be able to do the same

      • MichaelScotch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s been possible since way before cell phones were invented. Call the school and have them give your kid a message. School children on their phones all day long is why your kids can’t read, do math, or pay attention to anything longer than 5 minutes. Also, cyber bullying and negative social media influences are brutal and are contributing to rising suicidal ideation and attempts.

        • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 days ago

          Is my kid on her phone more than I’d like? Yes. But she’s a straight A student. Doesn’t change the fact I want us to be able to contact each other should an emergency arise

          • droans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            You can. You call the school. That’s what people did before schools started allowing phones everywhere.

            If there is an emergency, you’ll need to call them anyway. No school is just gonna let your kid leave because the kid says it’s okay.

            Sincerely, a fellow dad

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    My kid is not going to the murder factory without a phone. I’d be happy to scream at someone in a room over it. Guarantee my kid’s safety or they’re bringing a phone.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Not to be a jackass but what will their phone help with in this supposed murder factory? If ur so worried about a shooter or something, it’s not like the phone puts them in an invincibility bubble or something.

      • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        IDK man how could having 300 portable, accessible ways to call 911 in a shooter emergency possibly help in that moment?

        C’mon guys help me figure out this MENSA-level brain-twister.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Having students alert 911 in that situation is insane. Their priority should be either running away or hiding, neither of which is helped by getting on a phone call. If that’s the point hire someone whose job is 100% just doing that and make everyone safer for it.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Ah yes, let’s flood the 911 lines with panicked kids and then their parents too. Making sure no other emergencies can call 911. Isn’t it great every single other type of emergency a person can have will magically be put on hold until the school situation is cleared up…

          Oh, and there’s going to be some kids who will think they need to give regular updates, so they’d likely put themselves in danger in order to “just help”

      • Malyca@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        He can call me and I can come help. It’s not much, but it’s something that gives me peace of mind a little bit.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          Not the be that prick, but how? If there’s an active shooter, you’re not bulletproof just because you’re a parent. Or are you storming in and going to start shooting yourself? Really curious what your plan is.

          • Malyca@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            My plan is to get any kids I find out, that’s all I can do. Doubt I’d bring a weapon, way too high a chance I’d hit a friendly target instead.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Leave in lockers. The law says teachers can confiscate them for class if out and then give them back at the end of class.