Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    hahaha, this is the first thing I though after the idiot changed the iconic name to nothing, go twitter! (no, I’m not joining bluebird, but I like the trust threshold idea)

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And I’m going to keep dead naming X as Twitter until Musk stops dead naming his daughter. I never used the site in the first place, but that’s besides the point.

    • AliOski@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      ngl, who cares? I’ve never seen somebody going rabid over calling it Twitter.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And I’m going to keep dead naming X as Twitter until Musk stops dead naming his daughter.

      I’ll dead name Twitter long after Musk stops dead naming his daughter, or he himself is dead. X is a stupid fucking name.

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I joined when it was the only way to win a pair of tickets to The Colbert show’s last taping. I didn’t win, I’ve never opened the site again. My username is like “adifficultpoo” lol

    • Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      imo musk is a deadname now after he came out as a nazi. Now its just the nazi or space nazi if there are multiple nazi’s in the subject being discussed

  • kraxla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Early Access is open. $20 to join, $40+ to fight.” From twitter.now

    xD. The original twitter was free!

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yeah. “Lets try centralized algorithmic corporate social media again.”

    Im sure this attempt will end up just as wholesome.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m not claiming Twitter is great.

      But this is obviously going to fail, always was obviously going to fail. It’s a PR stunt, nothing more.

      Twitter will sue them, they’ll settle for giving up the name and some token fine, and hopefully they’re on the map. Or, their hail mary long shot will pay off and they’ll get to call themselves twitter in which case holy shit they’re golden. That’s the strategy.

      It’s stupid- they’ll lose in court and I doubt whatever they offer is more compelling than what’s already out there.

      • 5318008@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s stupid

        Definitely.

        they’ll lose in court

        I’m not sure they will, genuinely. They intentionally abandoned the domain name for the website… and they’re no longer using the logo or name anywhere on their product, or corporate documentation.

        The case that it’s up for grabs is actually decently strong.

          • ShaunKL@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            This is more akin to Disney saying, “We hate mice! Disney is now a chain of casinos and we’re rebranding to 🅱️!”

            Could almost be similar to the situation that forced Musk to buy Twitter in the first place, because he of course tweeted that Twitter would never be Twitter again and they were ‘getting rid of the bird’”.

            There are more details in the article and older articles linked as well.

  • Crakila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago
    • Cash grab on an old name and hoping people pony up the $20 to join it.
    • Not using ActivityPub or ATProto.

    Yeah, it’s already DOA.

    If anyone is serious about creating a new centralised social network these days, they have already lost.

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Shame. A new Twitter that supports all the open protocols would have been cool. Fediverse with a name people recognise.

        • mcv@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Mastodon is not called Twitter, and the vast majority of people have no idea what it is, unfortunately. A Mastodon instance called Twitter would be a great idea, although I think Mastodon doesn’t support all the protocols like Friendica does. But Friendica is too unlike Twitter.

          • jonzobot@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I suppose that could potentially drag Mastodon’s developer into a legal fight (if X were to sue them), which would be costly and a distraction.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It may well be intended as a serious attempt but personally I’m just going to view it as trolling/a gimmick, in which case I don’t care how shit the actual platform is. Seems to be more about making a point against Musk than getting a serious userbase.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Somewhere in there is step 3: profit

      I want to start a business that fleeces these rubes, how does an average man break into the bullshit game

    • T-Rex91@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Would be funny if Twitter/X Supports ATProto. Maybe also don’t give up the X Brand and you could interact with Bluesky users or twitter or X Handles and if you Bridge to the Fediverse yeah that works to. I could really delete my x/Twitter Profile and say. Hey My new Handle is my bridged Mastodon Account.

  • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    1 day ago

    So, I’m just checking…

    1. It is not open source?
    2. It uses AI to “Fact-Check”?
    3. It costs 20$ to join, and possibly more later?

    Well, they have chosen interesting path those people behind this thing.

  • Jinarched@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    2022: Come on, it’s just 8$ it’s basically the price of a coffee.

    2026: Come on, it’s just 20$ it’s basically the price of a coffee.

    • SGG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      24 hours ago

      2030: Come on, it’s just 50 bottle caps, it’s basically the price of a coffee.

      • Jinarched@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Didn’t know since we don’t follow this convention where I’m from.

        Shrugs

        • chewypoops@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Every one of these symbols goes before the number: $€£¥₹

          Where are you from where it comes after? What currency do you use?

          The only time this comes after the number, that I am aware of, is when you use abbreviations like USD or EUR instead of the symbol.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It’s language specific. In english it comes before the number. In many other languages it comes after.

      • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Is it that relevant in this day and age? I was taught you put £ (or whatever currency you’re using) first when you’re writing so Johnny Fraudster can’t turn your 100£ into 1100£.

        That all feels a bit immaterial on the web.

        • TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Yes, it’s relevant in this day and age, because it’s still incorrect to do it the other way (at least in English and with $£¥ and a couple others, as another commenter pointed out).

          When I read “20$” my first thought is that the person writing it didn’t pay attention in elementary school.

          And being lenient about it on the web leads to the behavior leaking into the real world on things like shop signs.

          Don’t even get me started on people who (mostly IRL) write things like “0.99¢” which makes me want to give them a cent and tell them to keep the change.

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    290
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol. It’d be hilarious if this succeeded. It was so dumb of Musk to change the name.

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Most of what musk does is dumb.

        People are dumber than him though, for example there are plenty of idiots here who share content from his platforms

          • m0nt@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            And also by being a vaporware scam artist. Thunderf00t on YouTube has a whole collection of videos showcasing Musk’s whole repertoire of bullshit.

            • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              yea… that’s pretty much all Thunderfoot posts about nowadays… he hella fell off, for multiple reasons. But like, a decade ago he used to talk about scam kickstarters, atheism, interesting science topics, etc. And then in those debunking science videos he would bring the math and receipts that made it fun to watch… But then in the past 5 years it’s just been Elon… nearly every video is about Elon. It’s obsessive.

              And tbf, that’s not the only ick around Thunderfoot. I mean, he did kinda get his start during the Anti-SJW culture war shit doing anti-femisist ragebait videos. Basically occupied the same spaces as Sargon, Bearing and GradeAunderA… and he’s never really “grown” out of that, or addressed it, let alone apologized for it. He harps on Elon, and sometimes Trump/AlexJones/StevenCrowder but he’s never really talked about how he and his ilk helped bring them about.

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                His latest video was exploring ‘anti-baking soda’ as a potential novel way to do CO2 capture at scale.

                https://youtube.com/watch?v=fvxNmStSC3M

                He also ‘got his start’ before Anti-SJW youtube was a thing. His first series that popped off, back in the day, the day being 2008ish, was "Why do People Laugh at Creationists?'.

                I don’t know that he ever … explicitly collabed with Sargon or any of those guys, but yeah he did exist in roughly the same genre-space, around the GamerGate era of i dunno, 2013 to 2015, ish?

                While he has covered Elon a lot, thats because he started calling bullshit on Elon’s nonsense since way, way before that was common… he’s been tooting his own horn a bit, following around 10 years of Elon’s trolls telling him he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, and well, it turned out he did.

                He literally has a personal grudge against Elon Musk.

                For all his faults, he is one of the oldest, OG youtubers, since damn near day 1, who is also still around, and hasn’t imploded.

                His first vid is 19+ years old, so, 2007ish, and its calling out GWB as a war mongering liar.

                All that being said, if you want a more recent youtube channel thats basically just mostly been tearing Musk to shreds, with science: Common Sense Skeptic.

                By ‘more recent’ I mean they’ve only been around for 5 or 6 years, I think.

              • mecen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Not to mention that he milks this content to extreme, he can say things which would take 1 minute in 10

              • m0nt@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Was unaware of much of that; how disappointing. That being said, what I’ve watched about Musk was informative.

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            23 hours ago

            A surprising number of people do not understand how getting rich works. Literally anyone can do it. You simply need to do whatever everyone else refuses to do.

            You take on the risks. You debase yourself you compromise any and all ethics. You whore out for shareholders who will give you endless money to shield them from consequences they directly funded.

            It’s profitable because there is always demand for a new villain and damn near nobody wants to do it. For a good fucking reason.

            • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You seem to be mistakenly conflating getting rich with increasing wealth. Just about nobody gets rich. Many people leverage their existing wealth to gain more. Frequently, that exchange is the start of what is now defined as enshitification.

              Everyone cannot do it. Fundamentally its easy: Have money and pick something to middleman. Waste capital until you ‘disrupt’ that flow. ???. Maybe profit. Who the fuck cares? You got yours. Repeat.

              Simple: have wealth. Easy.

              Step one is have money to make money. Aside from being the result of two wealthy people fucking… care to detail how so many people are checking that box?

              Certainly - there ARE paths to wealth… but they are rare, risk heavy, and frequently are destined to be prey to a resource rich competitor.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              You take on the risks.

              It’s easier to take on the risks when you’re already rich from inherited wealth.

              • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                It’s in the shop. In Canada. But totally real. You just can’t see it right now because it’s in the shop. In Canada.

          • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I’m hearing ‘once you have money do…’

            Care to tell me where that gullible userbase is coming from? Pray, tell - what do they come for?

            Before that is even a factor you must either be first - with research and development … and manufacturing… and distribution… or better. Or cheaper! Or able to undercut the competition.

            Of the things mentioned… I seem to be struggling to find the element lacking a substantial financial investment.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Care to tell me where that gullible userbase is coming from?

              They’re not all gullible. A lot of VC types are obsessive gamblers, they’ll throw money at anything that sounds like it might have a high return.

              Pray, tell - what do they come for?

              That’s where the marketing comes in. Elon is pretty good at selling these big ideas, making them sound futuristic and world-changing. He not only sells those ideas to VCs, but also to the government. A lot of his businesses have pulled in substantial government contract money. The public rarely gets any return from those tax dollars.

              • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                VC won’t give you the time of day if you lack a product or platform. This isnt go-fund-me or r/wsb. VC appear to bet big but are frequently pretty well informed and diversified. Their big bets aren’t much from their prospective… and frequently will be the first to squeeze “their due” from a failing venture.

                I dont see how Elon makes a good example for this. If anything it supports what I said:

                Elon is wealthy. He has a platform. He has shit he’s bought and is reselling snake oil from those things. He’s not poofing something from nothing.

      • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I used to be surprised at how stupid billionaires can be. But, then I remembered they don’t actually do anything where they work, and the real employees run behind them and clean up their messes. When they stick their fingers in the works, they fuck it up, Cybertruck being one example.

        • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Third generation curse.

          I personally believe the cybertruck was a designer who was making fun of musk. He submitted a pinewood derby car he made when he was 7.

          Its the literal emperors new clothes.