• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Silicon valley in a nutshell. No end of idiot ideas and endless amount of money to fund them all.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    the prototype satellite is part of the tech giant’s Project Suncatcher. As its name suggests, the goal is to take advantage of unfiltered sunlight around the clock to power AI data centers in our planet’s orbit — instead of crushing the electrical grid, spewing copious amounts of pollution, and draining fresh water supplies back on the ground.

    They know they could use solar on the ground too right? They are making it seem like they care about the environment, but if there was a way to suck hydrocarbon power from the surface they would 100% do it

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s just what we need, a single individual server in space with incredibly long latency times. Really useful technology. This brilliant idea is brought to you by the same people that came up with the totally workable idea of mirrors in space to charge for sunlight.

    • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m not going to say it’s brilliant, but if they can stick computers out there that get unlimited free solar power and free cooling courtesy of the icy death vacuum of space, is it really that bad?

      If they could make it operational and scale, no more fucking stupid terrestrial data centers eating water and power here. Let them try it. They got plenty of money.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        and free cooling courtesy of the icy death vacuum of space, is it really that bad?

        Yes. You don’t get cooling AND vacuum from space, the vacuum aspect prevents the majority of cooling since there’s nothing to take that heat away other than IR radiation.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        free cooling courtesy of the icy death vacuum of space

        Cooling in space is actually really hard. The only way to get rid of heat out there is to radiate it away as black body radiation, which is a really really slow process. It’s like wrapping your computer in a really really thick blanket.

        The solar power is the only thing space has going for it.

      • SkibidiSigmaRizzler@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Vacuum is actually not that great for cooling, as no gas surrounding the Computer means the only way of exchanging heat with its environment is via radiation. Cooling something only via radiation is less efficient then cooling something via convection.

        Of course using (probably very complicated, comically large and pretty expensive) cooling systems might be possible, but in no way as easy as “the icy death vavuum of space’” makes it seem.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can put solar panels on earth based data centers, you could have closed loop cooling systems on earth-based data centers. The location of the data centers isn’t the problem, it’s the fact they’re not doing any of that that’s a problem.

        We need to stop subsidizing them. If they have the money to launch things into orbit then they have the money to build out sustainable infrastructure here on planet Earth.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I wonder how they’re going to cool it?

    Edit: Oh. So they’re just… not doing that. Okay. Hmm.

    In the meantime, the company is taking baby steps. For now, the company is limited to just 15 minutes of operation in space before the chips have to be shut off to cool back down.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      “It’s just a proof of concept guys, there are totally tons of good reasons to do this. We are definitely not just mashing sci-fi words together to scam investors.”

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Building a relatively puny and ineffective data center because they’re idiots? perhaps. Doing it knowing it’ll provide overwhelming evidence that the idea is really dumb and making some well timed shorts against a certain launch company with an inflated value that’s been touting this very concept, maybe? (idk what I’m really talking about but it’s what comes to mind.)

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    dogshit ass timeline where billionaire sociopaths keep doing the wrong things got me truly irritated since 2020

  • Yukonfooty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just waiting for them to realize it’s more cost-effective to just keep destroying the environment.

  • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Ignoring the hundred reasons this is dumb, I would just love to know the launch cost per expected compute.

    Best quote from article is at the very end:

    For now, the company is limited to just 15 minutes of operation in space before the chips have to be shut off to cool back down.