This news is a year old.
China very likely surpassed 1,250 GW at this moment.Oh didn’t even notice the date, you’re right given the rate of the build out, it’s likely much further along now.
826.5x the power needed to time travel in a Delorean. That’s a lot of GW.
yeah but how fast is china moving?
perhaps the real 88 miles per hour is the libyan nationalists we met along the way.
i hate it when someone else does my joke before me. :p
US Tech leadership in the World is already a running Gag in China since time.
There’s very little useful tech in the US; every time I see what other countries are doing and having traveled to some. We’re living in the dark ages.
I can’t think of anything other than enshitification being the largest advancements in the US.
We have a system of units based on factors of 1000. Why on earth wouldn’t one say “surpass 1 TW”? If they want important sounding numbers, they could say “a million megawatts”.
sometimes things become standard I guess
like driving 1000 kilometers for a trip or weighing 100 kilograms
using 1000 kWh in your house
According to this wikipedia source, the entire species generated 18TW in 2019
A lightning strike is around a terawatt.
You’re mixing up units, and I’m not sure what you’re saying.
Watts are a unit of power. Watt hours are a unit of energy.
The link you gave, which is not Wikipedia, describes 180,000 TWh of energy used in 2025, 2,811 TWh of which came from solar.
Did I say it was a wikpedia link, or did I say it was a wikipedia source?
Does the OP link say GW or GWh?
Fuck off. You’re a failure of a pedant.
Oh, I was gently warning you that you were unintentionally wrong. OP’s link is about power, and your link is about energy, and you’ve somehow managed to completely misread it.
But if you’re gonna dig in your heels, then sure. Continue being wrong. Being a dick about it won’t make others take you seriously.
You literally wrote the wrong unit. What a loathsome fucking wretch you are. Stupid, antagonistic, smarmy. This place is more reddit every day.
You’re thinking of OP (or the original article’s title), the person you’ve been talking to here is someone else
Either way, OP is correct. The linked article talks about power capacity, not energy produced. This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,” misquote a completely different and irrelevant energy stat by 4 orders of magnitude, using a power unit, and bring some kind of attitude with it.
This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,”
Think about this for literally five seconds you fucking moron.
Does wikipedia link to itself as a source?
What do you think the word ‘source’ means?
did I say it was a wikipedia source?
What a stupid thing to get upset about. Just cite the source, why did you bring Wikipedia into it if you’re not gonna reference what it was cited for there…
If you find an article on Google, do you call it a Google source?
If you find an article on Google, do you call it a Google source?
I found a claim on wikipedia and then linked the source it listed. So literally the exact thing you’re telling me to do as if you weren’t completely wrong about what was happening.
deleted by creator
