Would software engineers ever unionise in future, if the industry keeps getting shit every year due to AI and layoffs?

  • josephc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    CAIT: Collective Action in Tech and the Tech Workers Coalition are both trying. Support them as best you can.

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This must be US centric yeah? I am in a union in Denmark as an engineer, and was when I was specifically a software engineer too.

    I hope it can happen everywhere, it’s been great for us in the few years I’ve been part of it.

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m in one right now. There’s a ton of guilds too in the US.

    Got me a raise and fought a RTO sillyness.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it was possible to create a union without interacting with each other, it would already be done.

  • ThisUsernameKillsFascists@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    As their jobs keep getting devalued, by AI (whether appropriate or not), and they are increasingly treated as unskilled labor, there will be more pressure to organize in order to mitigate losses in pay and benefits.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember an old coworker said he was anti union. “I’d just find another job if I didn’t like the one I had”, he said. Bold claim.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bold claim

      For me it was true all my life.

      That’s the point where Usa (and probably China) are different than the other parts of the world.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    My personal bet would be no. They’ll automate themselves away and slovenly play the corporate game before unionising. As a collective that is. Perhaps there’s lots to say about the culture of the profession, but I suspect it’s just too childish and spoilt.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I was going to say, the Silicon Valley corporate game feels too individualistic for its players to consider unionisation

  • AskewLord@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No.

    Unionize mostly occurs for working class folks, esp those working in the public sector or for a utility/infrastructure type of service.

    Software Engineers are not working class people, they don’t do public or utility types of work. There also is no point of collective bargaining for them as they don’t have centralized skills or a centralized set of employers like most union jobs do.

    • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Software Engineers are not working class people

      You’re regurgitating propaganda designed to divide us.

      “Working class” mean you work for a living. If your primary source of income is selling your labor, you’re working class. If you punch a clock or if you own a business where the main product is provided by your labor (electrician, plumber, small business owner), you’re working class. Income doesn’t matter. If you’re retired, that still counts.

      If your primary source of income is dividends, interest, passive income from investments or assets, or businesses where the main product is provided by the labor of others, you’re not working class because you don’t have to get up and go to work every day to make a living; other people have to get up and go to work every day to make your living for you.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      There also is no point of collective bargaining for them as they don’t have centralized skills or a centralized set of employers like most union jobs do.

      If you think “software engineers” don’t have skills as comparably fungible as carpenters or factory works either you’re not a programmer or your code is hot garbage.

      It’s also irrelevant with regards to unionization. Actors,.writers, lawyers, and doctors all have unions, and the last two are so old and so pervasive that it’s easy to mistake them for something else.

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      they don’t do public or utility types of work.

      Never heard of digital infrastructure or the internet, huh?

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        the internet is owned by private companies. including all the infrastructure.

        the only thing that is public is ICANN and the standards.

      • cinoreus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Problem isn’t the bunch of us, it’s the one’s who’re getting well compensated for their work. Tech has a very uneven pay, plus it’s susceptible to outsourcing. If anything Tech would require super globalized union, something that I don’t think has a precent.