• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    $50 mil, just enough to be reckless and still retire. I’d never work again. Vacations 24/7.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Whatever I need for churnin passive income to be comfortable and do some travel til end of life

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    10 mil. Enough to absorb all but the worst shocks to the stock market, continue to grow if desired, or pull $500,000/yr interest at a conservative 5% growth. $500,000 year means you could afford the Lamborghini, but you still gotta make payments.

    IMO $2-3 million today is about the “millionaire” of yesteryear, someone we used to call rich but not crazily so. $10 million is actual passive wealth that is enough to live very well without touching the principal.

    • eyesaremosaics@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      If you want it to run indefinitely then you need to let the principle grow with inflation as well, so with 5% growth and 3% CPI you have $200k to spend each year (which will also scale with CPI)

      Edit: you’ll also have to choose more risky investments to stay above CPI, which means the stock market rather than fixed interest, and means your pot of money can change quite a bit with market shifts, and you may need to downsize expenses in some periods or risk eating into your principle if you can’t trim your lifestyle

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yes, I understand that and stated that the amount could be allowed to continue to grow as one of the choices for the investment. There was no need for me to get into the details and make it a financial lesson in respons to a hypothetical fantasy amount of money.

  • PangurBan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    700k and I’d be choosing to be dirt poor in monetary value.

    But I’d have freedom to live. Not lavishly, but I’d be free. Read books. Exercise. Creat art. Love, maybe.

    There are many things in life that are both valuable and nearly costless. That’d be better than what I do now.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    OP should probably have asked for the ages of people responding. One million takes an old person beyond the grave but might fall short for a 20 year old.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    1mil but I’d probably still work. I’d wanna be a fulltime BERRT nurse (Behavioral Emergency Rapid Response Team) and just wander around the hospital at night calming patients down. I’ve done a little BERRT work but most hospitals won’t pay a living wage for someone to do that full time. It’s usually just lumped on the psych unit charge so they can only respond when they’re not busy which defeats the point of an emergency response protocol. Doing that full time and just wandering around the hospital giving fake cigarettes to people with Alzheimer’s and talking people withdrawing into sticking it out through their detox protocol would literally be my dream come true LOL.

  • heatermcteets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    4 million invested with 5% withdrawal rate and 400k in HYSA. 200k per year with 2 years in reserve to buffer any sequence of return risk on the 4M. Adjust spending and rate as needed.

    • CoconutLove@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why 5% withdrawal rate? Also, what do you do with your buffer in a year where the market crashes? Skip adding to your reserve that year and hope for a recovery?

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        many got burned on that formula before 2008. 45% of the entire value of the stock market is tied up in the magnificent seven of NVidia and AI. all go poof.

      • heatermcteets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There’s the famous 4% rule that has been amended to 4.7%. I rounded up to 5%. Just a nice even number of 200k per year. With the flexibility the buffer adds and the ability to cut back in a down year I’d be comfortable with the extra .3%.

        The buffer is there to live off of in a down year or years and not pull 5% out of the investment portfolio. Either 100% comes from the buffer or it can supplement a much lower withdrawal rate. In a known downturn I could reduce my expenses, minimize withdrawal rate, and fund the rest of the year with the buffer. Essentially I don’t want to pull $$ out of the 4M on a down year that will prevent recovery.

        In an up year or a year I didn’t spend the full withdrawal amount, I can replenish. The 5% rate over a long time period will still let the portfolio grow. So if I pay myself 200k per year static, my rate could also naturally decline. There are a lot of factors (inflation, expenses, lifestyle) but that’s the high level framework.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Millions, certainly. Probably about 2 of them, if we had that today I would be pretty confident. That is not likely to actually ever happen, or at least not before it wouldn’t be enough.

    ETA: I am near 60 & husband just past that so we don’t need to plan for as long. It would be more if we were younger.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    3 thoughts of school:

    1. Actually never working at all from my 30s onward, probably around 10 mil €.

    2. Quitting my job and getting into lazy investment to get a passive income, around 1.5 mil €.

    3. Playing into me being passively suicidal, if I loose my job and the number hits zero, I’m just killing myself. Technically that would also mean I don’t have to work again.

    Number 3 is the most realistic one.

    • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago
      1. Playing into me being passively suicidal, if I loose my job and the number hits zero, I’m just killing myself. Technically that would also mean I don’t have to work again.

      Dude, if you really want to do that, don’t waste your life pointlessly: rob a few banks and give the money to charities, Luigi a few billionaires, and play cat-and-mouse with the cops until they find you, and then make sure they suicide you, not you.

      • LouNeko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah man. Finding your peace in a forest, surrounded by nature with nothing to your name, that’s where it’s at.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Please don’t. I mean, first, please don’t. But also think of the people who will be sent to search for you and will eventually find you. And finally, please don’t.

        • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree. I live out in the sticks myself - not with nothing to my name, but I certainly haven’t saved anything for old age - and I have few needs. But this is not the thing OP was envisioning. And while I think it’s a terrible idea on its face, I just remarked that they could off themselves more productively if that’s what they really wish.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technically that would also mean I don’t have to work again.

      But if you are dead, you will never feel comfortable again. Technically that does not fulfill OP’s question. 😉

      • LouNeko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What is more comfortable than returning to the void from whence we’ve came?

        • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Literally everything in existence is more comforting and simultaneously discomforting than the nonexistent void.

          Comfort, as well as discomfort, are things not conceivable nor experienced in the void of nonexistence, since, y’know, they don’t exist (along with everything else).

  • Scott 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️ @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    1 million. Getting 3% back on investments will give me $30,000 a year. That far more than what I currently make. Also, less laundry, less eating out, and not burning so much fuel commuting to work and home.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Don’t forget inflation. That 30K isn’t going to buy you much in twenty years.

      The general rule is that you need to cover inflation plus what you want to withdraw. That way your income goes up as inflation does.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        put the money in a standard index fund. take $25k per million out first year. increase that dollar amount by 2.5 percent annually to account for inflation. should last indefinitely unless some moron in a white house blows up the country.