• king_comrade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Celebrating torture makes you worthy of receiving it. Bloody animals, challenge yourself and be better humans.

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They’re called Americans and it’s why the American penal system is about punishment rather than rehabilitation.

      Oh and don’t forget the for profit motive of the American penal system too. How else will they maintain slavery and turn locking humans in cages into a profitable business.

      • bertlewirth@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yup. Scandinavia actually rehabilitates their inmates and as a result has a very very low recidivism rate. Meanwhile in America, you go in for shoplifting and get turned into a hardened criminal who ends up murdering someone. #Freedumb

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s hard to have sympathy for Pike, given what she’s done. But at the same time, the state is torturing her at this point, which I’m pretty sure is in violation of her constitutional rights. If she is to be sentenced to death for her crimes, then just put a fucking bullet in her and end her misery already, which is what should have been done in the first place. The lethal injection has always been a cruel, wasteful, and performative procedure and should have been abolished ages ago. It exists not for the safety of the executed, but to protect the feelings of those who have to witness the execution. Fuck that; if you believe that you have the right to end somebody’s life as a punishment for their crimes, then you should have to witness the grim reality of the sentencing you give out. There is so much margin for error with the lethal injection process that an outcome like this was bound to happen eventually - in fact, this isn’t even the first time somebody’s survived a botched injection like this.

    I don’t really know where I’m going with all this. This story just has me riled up in a variety of ways lately.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      አማርኛ
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s especially bound to happen because it’s basically a medical procedure which is incompatible with being a medical professional. A medical professional would lose their license for performing this procedure, so the only way to do it is by using someone unqualified.

    • chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The answer is to abolish the death penalty, not to expedite the process with bullets. What the hell is wrong with you?

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m with you, but that is a slow and arduous process that has been fought for years now. In the meantime, until we as a society can wean off of killing our prisoners, we can at least be humane in the way we go about it. The lethal injection is by no means humane.

        • sportsjorts@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          This is America. The cruelty is the point. It would be easier to get people to go for drawing and quartering people at this point. I mean she requested to be hanged and shot I think.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Eh. I don’t really want to pay for people who torture others to death to hang around in a cage for a few more decades. Just needs to be done instantly and without room for error. And obviously only in completely open and shut cases where there is zero doubt the person committed the crime.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If cost is your concern, it’s cheaper to imprison someone than to pay for the courts and lawyers for the significantly longer legal process to execute someone, not to mention the execution itself.

          • hakase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            That’s not an argument against the death penalty in concept though - it could just as easily be taken as an argument for cheaper executions.

            • chewypoops@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              So expedite the process and eliminate the appeals process and make the whole thing an even bigger human rights atrocity?

              The solution is to not kill people. This isn’t a hard concept for mentally healthy people without bloodlust.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            If cost is your concern, it’s cheaper to imprison someone than to pay for the courts

            I’m aware. Which is why I also believe the process needs to be changed. If the person tortured someone to death and the evidence proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt, then the execution should be swift and sure. No appeals. No waiting years on death row. That’ll bring the cost down.

            There’s no valid reason why a swift execution following a trial and verdict should cost more than feeding, clothing, and housing someone for decades.

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              That’s a real big if. I don’t trust states like Texas or Mississippi with that power.

              • bertlewirth@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                George stinny was a black boy who was accused of murder of a white person in the 1800s (I think) somewhere in the Deep South. He had an all white jury, a useless fucking lawyer and pretty much had everything stacked against him. He was just 14 when he was executed. In the last few years, he was exhonorated.

                Anyway, my point is I wouldn’t trust ANY state with making sure someone is ACTUALLY guilty. If there is even a slight chance of someone innocent being executed, it should be abolished. It should be anyway as no one, outside of very few exceptions, like self defence, has the right to take someone else’s life.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    In comments released by her legal team on Friday, the prisoner said that there had not been a moment since she was injected with a massive dose of the sedative pentobarbital that she had not been in pain. “My body hurts. My arms hurt. My hands hurt. My throat hurts. I still struggle to speak. And the pain isn’t just physical. There is pain in my mind and in my soul,” she said.

    More in article.

  • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    if instead of trial and due process she was killed by a mob? would it have been more fair, just, and humane?

    I’m not using that hypothetical to defend mob justice, but instead to show how much the justice system has to fuck up to be less humane than mob justice

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yes, let’s let the unhinged person who carves pentagrams into people’s flesh before caving their skulls in go home.

      • Berlinblades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Look at the big picture,by this point she has had more done to her than she has done to others.

        Im not saying let her start a Babysitter’s Club, but at least let her swap jails with Ghislaine Maxwell.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wonder what her victim, whom she tortured, carved a pentagram into her chest, then crushed her skull thinks about all this.

    Why don’t we just use a guillotine? Properly sharpened there’s pretty little room for error. Seems like we just do the gas thing to make it easier on the people that show up to watch.

    In open and shut cases where it’s beyond doubt that the suspect committed a crime like this, I fully support the death penalty. No reason to keep them around, paying for them for decades.

  • hakase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I bet there was a hell of a lot of pain in the mind and soul of the poor girl she murdered too, so shrug.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Nah. We just need to stop doing lethal injections and use a gun or a guillotine or however many other guaranteed instant death methods humans have come up with. Lethal injection is silly. It’s just for the people that show up to watch.

        What value is there in keeping people who torture others to death in cages for decades before they die naturally while we foot the bill?

        • Sailor Anarres@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          For one why should the state have the power over life and death especially when mistakes are made? For another you know the death penalty cases cost more due to challenges and stuff like that, so even though “cost” shouldn’t matter even if it did your case isn’t supported.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            For one why should the state have the power over life and death especially when mistakes are made?

            Then who decides? Seems like you’re saying the alternative is for the state to decide to keep them locked in a cage for decades before they wither and die while we pay for it.

            Note that I said I only support it when the evidence undeniably proves they committed the crime.

            For another you know the death penalty cases cost more due to challenges and stuff like that,

            Then maybe we should change the process. Again, I said I only support it if the evidence is immutable. So why allow any delays in a situation like that? Should be quick and inexpensive beyond the initial trial.

            • Sailor Anarres@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Make it easier for the state to execute people with large amounts of wrongful convictions everywhere. The evidence is never “immutable”.

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        There are very good reasons to be against the death penalty and torture in the abstract, but that doesn’t mean we have to be sympathetic to this particular monster’s suffering.