Here in UK all polls are done by with paper ballots. When polls close there is a big push to get the boxes in the right place and votes counted quick. If a recount is needed its done then an there, it causes a hold up but nothing major.

Polls close at 10pm and by midnight-ish the results start coming in. In some places like highlands & islands it takes longer (transport and weather) but usually by 4am–ish everything is fully counted and announced. Its unusual to still be going at it after 5/6 am. And yes - we’ve had some very close races lately.

My confusion is, its not really that different to how its done in Mississippi. How is it possible to still be counting votes 3 days later??

I’ve been keeping an eye on the news but I’m finding it difficult to get a clear answer. What the hell is taking so long???

  • jobbies@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Mississipi allows postal votes postmarked up to election day. They then allow 10 days for these to make it through the system and then they count.

    Wondered about this. Wild. Sounds like the whole system is fiddled to ensure the republican norm.

    • jarvis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Some of it is mail in ballots but that’s normal in most states. The 1 week delay in Mississippi right now are the affidavit (provisional) ballots where someone didn’t have the right ID, had just changed their name, or otherwise couldn’t match their registered voter identity.

      Those folks sign a temporary vote (affidavit or provisional) and then have a week to follow up with the proper ID and otherwise sort out their information to ensure their vote is counted.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Remember that NONE of the results in any state are certified yet. Everything at this point is just projected wins based on statistical probability. Until all votes are counted, and potentially recounted depending on each state’s voting laws, there are no official winners yet anywhere. Some states have mandatory recounts if results are within a certain range. Some the candidates can request recounts if within certain ranges. That sort of thing.

      Most states allow mail in votes as long as they are postmarked by election day. Usually the race isn’t close enough to where the likelihood of ballots arriving more than a day or so after would change the outcome. Mississippi is unusually close, it is extremely rare for any election to be this close.

      It’s not a big deal really, the entire electoral system timeframe in the US is still based on needing to travel by horse to deliver notifications of counts and things like that. It was never updated for modern technology so there is plenty of time built into the system to count and adjudicate normally.

      • jobbies@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not a big deal really, the entire electoral system timeframe in the US is still based on needing to travel by horse to deliver notifications of counts and things like that. It was never updated for modern technology so there is plenty of time built into the system to count and adjudicate normally.

        To be honest it sounds incredibly backward to someone from a country where (in a general election) you vote one day, results announced by the time you wake up the next, and new head of govt in power by 2pm that day 😅

        In general, its as if rules and procedures in US are chiseled on a stone tablet and cannot ever be modified or removed.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Keep in mind when this election system spanning what was effectively over a dozen separate countries was developed, much of the world were still governing Monarchies.

    • Starya67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It sounds surprisingly fair to me. Many people who have to use postal voting work long hours or multiple jobs and they’re unlikely to vote R.

      • jobbies@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Better ways to handle it though i.e. send ballots out x weeks beforehand and demand they are returned by polling day.

        I’m not a fan of postal ballots tbh and people in places with mandatory voting (e. G. Oz) work just as hard and manage to do their duty.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Better ways to handle it though i.e. send ballots out x weeks beforehand and demand they are returned by polling day.

          because each State sets how their elections are handled. Many states do this, but mail-in voting isn’t universal. Some states as soon as you register they’re automatically going to send you a ballot you can mail back or drop off, others you can register for permanent early ballots. I bet you can guess which States those tend to be, and which political party tends to govern them. There are states that don’t allow it at all, and some only allow you to request an early ballot if you can prove you’re going to be out of the city/county/state on election day. And that requires that you weren’t purged from the voter rolls without being notified after the registration deadline (which can be months before election day).

          places with mandatory voting (e. G. Oz) work just as hard and manage to do their duty.

          That requires that voting is made easily and readily available. Something not true across much of the US since there is a party that historically does better when fewer people vote. So they do everything they can to prevent people from voting as much as possible (legally or not). Things like shortening hours the polls are open, or removing polling locations entirely, even making it so there’s only 1 location for an entire county with millions of people. Or not allowing people to vote after the polls close, even if they are already in line. And purging voter rolls days before the election so people have no idea they’re no longer registered to vote.

          Not to mention that while employers are usually required to give you time to vote, the requirement is often only an hour or two, while the lines at the polls can be multiple hours long. And that doesn’t take into account people having to work multiple part-time jobs where neither is required to give that time because there should be off hours to vote, but with the other job/jobs that time doesn’t actually exist.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Ok I do my job and mail it back early. But the postal system doesn’t drive it over quickly enough and it doesn’t get there in time. So my vote doesn’t count? I did my job. So why should my vote not count? As long as I do my job and it’s postmarked by a certain date, my vote should count.

        • micgerne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          we have postal votes in Australia and the closing date for them to be received is 2 weeks after polls close.