• M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I loath this site. It’s rarely loads well and the images never load for me. And it’s always so slow. It’s probably because I have an adblocker.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is slower without the adblocker since it waits for the ads to load if they are not blocked.

    • Caesium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have been preaching abandoning it for YEARS. It’s even worse on mobile because the formating is so messed up some links just don’t work. And even without adblock, there’s so many ads that THEY slow down the site. Just because it’s ‘free’ everyone defaults to fandom and I hate it so much

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think the Doom community successfully avoided fandom.

        What’s to stop someone else from scraping their site and hosting a better one? I’ve never heard of anyone who actually likes Fandom.

    • at_an_angle@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve found the best way to browse Fandom(if necessary) is to use a VPN set to Nordic countries. Ads are very generic and in a language I can’t read. So they are very easy to spot.

    • mrchampion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You could always use Invidious or Piped (instance list here) to avoid using YT directly if you want. You won’t get any ads or anti-adblocker bullshit with Invidious, so I usually use that. I’m not sure about Piped, but it seems good too. Unless your point is to simply stop using YT for anything, in which case just ignore what I said.

      EDIT: To the now 8 of you who downvoted me, just, why? No, seriously, why. If you downvote me, please at least tell me why you are instead of downvoting and leaving. It makes me anxious to think that I was a dick or spreading misinformation or just being rude and not even noticing it, and would much rather have someone say something to me so I can at least know what people don’t like. That’s not to say I would agree with it, I might not, but I’d rather know what the problem is so I can agree or disagree.

      • cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s the fact that not everything needs a 20 minute video. There’s a lot of topics that I’m interested in but skip because I don’t have 20, 30, 40, 60 minutes for it.

        • mrchampion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That makes sense. I just thought he had something against Youtube (and for good reason), since he only said “Not watching a YT video” instead of “Not watching a 20min video”.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    TLDR; Fandom has a lot of QAnon articles written to make the scams seem legitimate to less computer savvy people.

    My mom has fallen in a Qanon conspiracy world. The people from that world write Fandom articles about themselves to make it seem legitimate. I found them when I started investigating these people trying to convince her to steer clear.

    I don’t trust a single thing on Fandom anymore.

  • TheNanaimoBarScene@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree with the premise; fandom sucks. But does it really require a 20 minute exposé though?

    I’ve seen a few links to the Indie Wiki Buddy extension page. I’m not too interested in installing a browser extension to find new wikis, but I bookmarked their listing page: https://getindie.wiki/listings/

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mfw you want to check some quick Minecraft details and you get a pop up then half your screen covered with one video. Thank heavens that they created minecraft.wiki as a wiki is basically essential for playing that game.

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve always advocated against using Fandom. Not much customization and so many ads it makes the platform downright unusable.

    A much better alternative is Wiki.gg, created by some of the original founders of Fandom.

  • Vipsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Fandom hosts a lot of wikis for long forgotten nich’e games and with these games there usually isn’t enough interest to move to another wiki. When it comes to these wikis theres rarely if ever a team behind updating the wiki and more often than not the content is just being updated and maintained by random invidividuals who just happen to be engaging with the content at given time. The very low barrier of entry makes this possible as you don’t really need to join a team to edit pages or even coordinate with other people.

    When playing one of these games I like to record and share some my observations and findings about games mechanics etc but more often than not the only wiki I can find is fandom wiki that is either incomplete and possibly even abandoned. I cant be bothered to create my own Wiki for these games so I’ll just start editing that one instead because it’s easy, the foundation is usually already there and I don’t need to bother taking any sort of responsibility/mantle of maintainer or admin.

    While Fandom may not be the most optimal choice and there may be better ways to host wiki out there its still better than some obnoxious google document or poorly formatted steam guide that no one else can edit.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

    we have to use a decentralized open alternative (like lemmy) to take back control, switching to a proprietary solution by yet another company will only delay the problem further.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or we could just… host our own wikis. There’s plenty of open source software for them. It’s not hard. Not everything needs to be federated.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        that was my suggestion, sort of.

        it can be bigger than that too ofc.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      decentralized open alternative (like lemmy) to take back control

      which unfortunately still require capital to run

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        of course it does.

        and better if that capital comes from a network of companies/volunteers instead of one monolithic corporation that can just bully everyone into their will.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

      There was a time, long ago, where companies actually cared about their customers, and wanted to sell them good products while making a profit, and they strived for the win - win, and the “customer is always right” philosophy. They took their fair share, and they didn’t triy to squeeze every last dime out of their customers with crappy products.

      Not that that they were saints by any stretch of the imagination (there were definitely bad players back then too) but there used to be a sense of ethics with Capitalism, in America at least, a sense of products being warrantied to work the way they should be and advertised as how they would actually work.

      I have no effing idea how to get back to that state, as it seems like the “lunch for wimps” crowd are running the c-suites these days.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No way of going back to that state unless we start from scratch, power is too consolidated as it is. And capitalism would soon evolve back to something like this eventually anyway.

        We are on late stage capitalism now, as predicted by Marx.

        e: also those better times werent that good either if you werent white/from somewhere rich, not long ago kids were working in coal mines.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Regulation. Take the money out of governing, both national government and private directors. If someone makes decisions that affect many people, make that person accountable, either through a competitive market or a functioning justice system.

        The problem is that the fantastically efficient tool that is capitalism will try to increase it reach as much as possible. Killing competition and undermining laws will always be the end goal, so long as they are in anyway allowed.

        The reason companies used to care is because not caring drove customers to the competition. But then there was no competition, and the care evaporated. As long as they are allowed, they will take. Civility can only be guaranteed if profits are on the line.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        We can’t just get out of capitalism, but you can work to improve your situation. If you have a yard, grow a garden.

        Also, see if there’s a mutual aid group in your area, and if not consider talking with your neighbors about what you can do to help each other out. One person might be good with car Maintanance. Another might be a good gardener. Everyone can contribute something.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Gardening will not solve the climate crisis because it won’t offset the millions of tons of co2 being emitted.

          It would help, sure, but we have to radically change production to stop it. Currently the rich own those, so the best we can do short of removing them is plead.

          Also yes, you can’t just get rid of capitalism, history shows it takes years/decades of planning and organizing. Start as soon as possible because I don’t think we have all that much time.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Where did I say it would solve the climate crisis? I was just having an alternative to capitalism to provide some of your food. Of course it won’t dismantle capitalism or save the world. People have been gardening forever, yet here we are. It’s just a step you can take to take some control over your situation back.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Never said I would’nt do it either. I’d love to grow my own food over pesticide garbage we have in supermarkets here. I just don’t have any land at all, and there isnt any in a pretty big radius around me.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s fair. Most people don’t. You can probably still grow some food if you have access to a balcony even. It won’t be much, but it can offset some of your reliance on purchasing it.

                Also, again, look into mutual aid groups around you. There may be someone who does have space for a garden and produces more than they can consume. Maybe you have some skill or ability that could help them and get some food in return.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    I got special Stylish CSS blocking half the shit on Fandom. IDK about any politics about them but the site is borderline unusable.

      • Vipsu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Does this mean self-hosting the wiki?
        Because that increase the barrier of entry by tenfold as a lot of publishers/game studios do not host their own wikis.

    • stebo02@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      for Minecraft, minecraft.wiki

      for others i don’t know, some will have alternatives and others won’t…

      • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It really just depends on the fandom. Three more I know of are Bulbapedia for Pokemon, The Unofficial Elder Scrolls Pages for the Elder Scrolls, and Wookiepedia for Star Wars. They are all very comprehensive and functional.

        Edit: Forgot about the Super Mario Wiki too.

    • XbSuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unless the game your playing made their own, or someone else decided to self host and actually fill it with content (and finding it can be a pain), there isn’t one.

      Hoping someone knows a good fallout wiki, I hate using fandom, but it’s the only one I can find with good info.

  • g6d3np81@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Regarding SEO, What’s stopping maintainers from vandalizing their own fandom page?

    It would not be difficult to make a bot to update fandom page with a convincing but slightly wrong info, after a few hundred iterations, it’s all useless. Go look at what google recommend and do complete opposite. I’m convinced this will bomb ranking and put whatever wiki they migrated to at the top.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    For just about every single pokemon fan game I play, the fandom wiki pages have pretty much been utter garbage. Either they’re out of date, contain almost no useful info, or have a slew of other problems making it as painful as falling in a bunch of cacti. Same for most other ones I used to visit.

    Will admit, Pokemon Empire having their own site for their fan game is still infinitely better than the fandom pages for it.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think bulbapedia cover just about any official content as far as I’m aware, so long as it’s licensed or made by nintento directly. Anything from the games to the anime to the trading cards to things like obscure licensed Japanese arcade games based on the franchise.

        Don’t know if serebii does all that or if it just focuses on the games since I don’t use it.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why would we need a fediverse alternative 😂 unless you want to go around editing wikis with your mastodon account, wikis are basically just static webpages. It’s called HTML 😂

      • DestinyGrey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wikis like Fandom typically make it easy/easier to create and edit pages. Wiki editors are rare and you want to make it as easy for them to latch onto helping and volunteering as is possible.

        Maybe a fediverse option isn’t needed (though the below comment’s point about having a central account would make it easier for a lot of users), but having a convenient and easy way to create a wiki for your favorite fandom, without using Fandom would go a long way toward breaking Fandom’s hold over the entertainment sections of the internet.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I learned about this plug in the other day. Indie Wiki Buddy. It’s not a fediverse alternative, but it’s the next best thing. It can redirect your Fandom results to their independent alternatives.