Currently still in Nightly and only on ‘Copy Link’. Still nice progress though.
Great stuff. Firefox swinging the big dick about lately.
Just slappin the table with that fuckin toddler’s leg.
brandishing that baby arm holding an apple
Baby arm holding an apple, or an apple holding a baby arm?
The John Holmes of browsers
who?
John Holmes.
You probably know him as Johnny Wadd.
Don’t “who?” when they have a Wikipedia page.
Imagine being immortalised forever on Wikipedia with the sentence “… Was best known for his exceptionally large penis”
deleted by creator
Ooh. I hope this can be set as the default for ‘Copy Link’ and then I can just have the tracking when I actually want it.
firefox removes tracking data
chrome wants to make it possible for websites to refuse to serve you data if you run unapproved software
there is, in fact, a good guy in the browser wars
Reading the chrome bit just made me disgusted lol
“refuse to serve you data”, read as, “refuse to show you ads”, yeah right
I would love for you to expand on what you were trying to say with this comment, in great detail. I would consider it a favor.
Another fine addition would be a cut of redirecting trash. If you post some link in some soc network, it would sometimes replace it with it’s own link going through an outbound clicks tracker, safety pages ‘Do you really want to follow it?’ or just block you saying the link seems malicious.
If I’m a 3%er, can I choose not to have it?
There is an Extension called FastForward which skips ad-link redirectors.
Not sure if thats what you mean.Gonna try it, thanks.
Found what you need, not sure if it works for specifically Gmail though: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/skip-redirect/
Might break a few things when set to act in blacklist mode… had that happen, but was rare
I think Gmail on Android does this. Any link you click on in the app Firefox shows you the initial Google address before you go to the link you clicked on.
If you copy and paste the URL this doesn’t happen.
This may be difficult to maintain as some query parameters might be necessary. How will they be sure they’re not stripping essential elements? Won’t this become an arms race to mask tracking elements as “legitimate” looking parameters?
Awesome if they can pull it off, though.
A uBlock style community sourced list would be a great way to address this. Once it’s in prod, an addon would be next.
Won’t this become an arms race to mask tracking elements as “legitimate” looking parameters?
Maybe, but only like 3% of people are using Firefox so, maybe not?
Neat. Now we need a built-in AMPutator.
Is AMP still a thing? I haven’t seen it in ages.
I don’t use Google so maybe that’s why, but I hadn’t even seen it on Reddit or Lemmy in more than a year I believe.
Oh man. I see it all the time. People share amp links on social too often.
I see it pretty often. But most of the time, if an “AMPutator” bot doesn’t reply, someone usually mentions it and says to stop sharing AMP links and provides links to information about it. It’s good to see, but most people still aren’t aware of it, and most of those people wouldn’t care much. We all need to keep a lookout and always be ready to inform and teach others about it. It’s good to have articles about how AMP is bad for everyone (except google) saved so we can quickly share them every time we see someone share an AMP link.
Based Firefox
Firefox once again proving it’s the GOAT of browsers.
I’m sure this will come to mobile soon as well.
deleted by creator
Would love to see this becoming a default !
Fucking fantastic, People’s browser gets better and better!
BASED
This should be default, or at least a switch, that if enabled, all links copied without tracking. BTW i was thinking, isnt there a simple app or service, that does only this: listen for links in clipboard, if a link added, automatically removes tracking params, and replaces with that on clipboard?
IMO this shouldn’t be default, since it messes with the link you’re copying, not only because of the potential to break.
How does firefox determine which params are trackers and which params are required data?
I think I’m against this. Not because it’s the wrong thing to do, but it’s just going to swing marketers & such to obscure their tracking URLs to something like
/my-slug/hashed-uid-for-tracking-without-query-param/post& it maybe unsafe or impossible to replace that part of the URL is some cases (think how not all credit cards numbers work, it has a built-in algorithm). The corpos can do this already now but query params are easier & less fiddly. Despite the large number of add-ons that could combat this already (including a uBlock Origin filter list), there wasn’t enough incentive to start another ad/tracking arms race… but you introduce it as a default feature in a major (🤞) browser, & now the corpos take notice instead of being able to wave it off as something a minority of users are doing.…And I say this as the guy that reminds
$WORKchat poster to remove their tracking URLs for the privacy of the groupIt’s a shame they went for the additional option rather than a persistent setting that would always strip it from a URI.
Hoping that this is just testing for that to come.
Ublock can strip it from the URL automatically, though if the website checkw this it might block stuff :/
Would need some deeper integration to be able to separate the URL bar the Website sees and the one you see. (like the current separation of the DOM)If Apple can do it, Mozilla can do it: https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-remove-tracking-info-from-links-in-macos-safari-and-reclaim-your-privacy/
