• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s one interesting thing about this: They trained the players so hard to associate their store with the free weekly giveaways and only the free weekly giveaways, that’s all everyone uses the client for now, and never mentally considers it to be usable for anything else.

      The effect is pervasive, too. Games factually have not released if they’re epic-exclusive. They’re not discoverable on PC, as nobody would ever imagine checking the Epic catalogue for a game they’re looking for. That’s not what you open Epic for, it’s those 1-2 free weekly games and nothing else.

      In their bid to vie for developers not consumers they went so far too far that they have managed to alienate the concept of “selling games to players” in the consumers’ minds, therefor making their store automatically unable to compete at its main intent.

      Mind you, there are far more problems with it. Among which is that despite having so little in there, discoverability and navigation are downright terrible! It’s an interesting lesson for frontend/UI design I imagine.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        This. I visit the site every week to claim the free games. If a game is epic exclusive, I consider it not released yet.

          • zerofk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is a good point. Everyone harps on Epic’s exclusivity, but there are a huge amount of games that only exist on Steam. Most of these never go on other platforms, and many that do, do so only years later.

            When put like this, it sounds a lot like Steam and Epic are similar. Of course the difference is that, as far as we know, Valve doesn’t pay for this exclusivity - except indirectly by visibility.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Won’t even take their free ‘gifts’, worse than Origin when it comes to spyware and data collecting. I can’t understand anyone who willingly puts EGS on their device but complains about advertisers on other platforms collecting info about them.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah let’s not forget this is the client that went through your Steam-installed files on your drive to see what it could offer you.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because ads are something I dont want to see in general. EGS is something I knowingly use and want on my pc to play games. The choice is what makes it different.

      • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably people who understand how to make their computer do what they want it to? You control who your software talks to.

        Well, at least at the application level.

    • Bulletdust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I got Death Stranding…

      …It was free. The Epic client runs under Bottles in its own isolated sandbox, so it can’t spy on me.

      If it’s free it’s for me, if you have to pay no way.