JERUSALEM (AP) — The head of surgery at Gaza’s largest and most advanced hospital held up his phone Saturday to the hammering of gunfire and artillery shelling. “Listen,” said Dr. Marwan Abu Sada as fighting raged around Shifa Hospital.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kinda similar to the “human shields” argument. When I read comics growing up, when a villain takes a hostage the answer was never “kill the hostage” except for the edgiest of antiheroes, yet here we are with “human shields” being used as a justification to kill civilians. It’s fucking wild.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wonder if a lot of people’s idea of war has been shaped by the recent American occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, which were wars of choice where at least in theory American soldiers were fighting largely for the benefit of the natives. Countries that believe they actually need to win and don’t have the option of just giving up and going home fight wars in a very different way. Consider for example World War II, the proverbial “good versus evil” war fought by the generation that originally came up with the comic book characters you read about. The Allies certainly didn’t hesitate to kill enormous numbers of Axis civilians in the course of destroying military targets. (IMO the Allies actually went way too far and a lot of the strategic bombing of Germany and Japan served no military purpose, but I suppose they were more worried about bombing too little than they were about bombing too much.)

      • Nobody@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The total war tactics of WW2 are unthinkable by modern standards, but it’s hard not to sympathize with an outgunned army fighting for their home. They fight because they’d rather die than lose.

        Maybe instead of fighting people in that position, you talk to them and work out a peace deal. If they’re willing to be reasonable, end the violence.

  • HowMany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because Israel is committing war crimes. Because Israel has stated, unequivocally, that Palestinians are animals and must be scourged off the face of the earth.

      • Glytch@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, Hamas is airstriking hospitals and refugee camps too? No? They’re not? Only Israel is doing that?

        Why wouldn’t this genocide be blamed on the ones committing it? Use your head.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Intentionally targeting civilians is a war crime.

        And before you bring up human shields, the only ones to do so were the Israelis in operation Cast Lead. Read up on it of you don’t know. If you do and still say this, then you’re a genocidaire and I don’t give a shit what you say.

    • Argonne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      54
      ·
      1 year ago

      And also because Hamas is using Hospitals as base of operations because they will get sympathy for it and human shields. No side is right here

      • Mir@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you please reread what you just said? You’re saying it’s okay to kill children and innocent people in order to kill someone else you actually want to kill?

        • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas must be completely eliminated, period. No cost is too great, for the good of the entire world and all its future children.

          Please explain your strategy which accomplishes that goal while not harming the human shields they’re using, and collect your Nobel Peace Prize.

          • theluckyone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            " Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you."

            Friedrich Nietzsche

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Not yours. Israel isn’t doing a thing in Qatar.

            You’re either a liar or you believe in obvious lies.

        • Argonne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think you need glasses or some mental help because that’s not what I said. I am saying Hamas is committing war crimes by using the hospital and forcing Israel into war crimes by attacking the hospital. There is no good guy here. If you reread that’s what I said

            • Argonne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              1 year ago

              According to international law they are. If they shoot from a school, Israel has to shoot back. Do they are forcing their hand

              • Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Could you cite that law for me? Because last I checked there is no such law forcing Isreal to shoot back, school or otherwise.

                Intentionally bombing civilians is a war crime. I don’t care how many of your “intended targets” you think you’re getting. If you are bombing civilian centers, like, oh let’s say a hospital for instance, then you are a war criminal, Full stop. There is nothing forcing Isreal to do that.

            • Threeme2189@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel had to tear down one of its own police stations in Sderot becausesome Hamas terrorists were cooped up in there after attacking it on the 7th of October.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You really think using human shields is really a good excuse to bomb hospitals. “they’re using hostages! Quick teach those hostages a goddamn guided 2000lb lesson!”

        • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, let’s just let Hamas murder millions. They’re invincible because all they have to do is grab the nearest civilian.

          Get the fuck outta here with that idiotic child logic…

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Get the fuck out of here justifying genocide.

            Never again was for everyone.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look hamas killing “millions” is unlikely given they haven’t topped 5000.

            Coolio. So lemme grab your kids take them hostage and you can tell me again that murdering me and your children is the only solution to hostage situation.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is clear evidence that at least some hospitals were alleged to be Hamas operation centers but in fact were not. But even if they were operation centers, would you still think it’s justified? How many Hamas members are worth how many “accidental” deaths of hospital staff and patients? Who would even dream of making such a formula? It’s sick.

        The issue at hand is about hospitals being destroyed, not about the Israel-Palestine conflict on the whole. Please save your “no side is right” language for an issue where that actually applies.

  • Motavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because both sides are fighting are major assholes. Hamas does hide arms and fighters in and around hospitals. Israel doesn’t hold back attacking the hospitals to get at that gear, because they care more about killing Hamas than saving Palestinians. The civilians in Gaza are surrounded by assholes.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a terrible headline. If APNews thinks it’s a war crime, it has a duty to say so. You can’t just write a headline like this without drawing the obvious inference.

      • stewsters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well it’s kind of open to interpretation, which may be why they didn’t want to directly say that, just imply it.

        Article 19 of the Geneva convention:

        The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

        Now are firing qassam rockets “harmful to the enemy”? Probably.

        Has due warning been given? Maybe? It’s not well defined what that means. Does roof knocking count? Do you need to submit a form to their embassy?

        I think the big problem is that the kind of warfare we are seeing here is unlike what they saw when they wrote those laws.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is written in the passive. That’s intentional; it’s a classic approach that writers use to dodge the issue. It’s not OK and we shouldn’t excuse it.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given most people aren’t reading the article, the particularly relevant points:

    International humanitarian law lends hospitals special protections during war. But hospitals can lose their protections if combatants use them to hide fighters or store weapons, the International Committee of the Red Cross said. […]

    In an editorial published Friday in Britain’s The Guardian newspaper, International Criminal Court prosecutor Karim Khan issued a warning to combatants that the burden of proof is on them if they claim hospitals, schools or houses of worship have lost their protected status because they are being used for military purposes. And the bar for evidence is very high.

    “If there is a doubt that a civilian object has lost its protective status, the attacker must assume that it is protected,” Khan wrote. “The burden of demonstrating that this protective status is lost rests with those who fire the gun, the missile, or the rocket in question.”

    TL;DR: If Hamas is conducting military operations from hospitals, they can be legitimate targets in the eyes of international law, but precautions still need to be taken to avoid civilian casualties and the case for their military use should be overwhelming, not amorphous or tenuous.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because Israel is trying to genocide.

    They don’t care about Hamas, they just want Palestine gone.

      • HolyDriver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We aren’t. But anyone that voices an opinion against Israel in my country is labeled an anti-Semite, so people stay quiet.

        Also Putin is doing the same, global out rage, no one really stepped in due to politics

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because if you don’t support genocide you are an antisemite, and only one of those can destroy your political aspirations (hint, it isn’t supporting genocide).

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most civilians aren’t but they’ve found out in 3 weeks time that they live all live in pretend democracies and not real ones. Mask off we’re the Russia now.

      • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ever seen an oil tanker turn? That is the the way the world works with Israel slowly and not quick to judge. The rest of us though have had enough, fuck Israel and no funding of them whatsoever.

  • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy thought, why don’t we just not bomb hospitals? Anyone?

    Or how to make people hate you more than Hamas, a book by the IDF.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if rockets and other weapons really are being fired from hospitals? What do you do then?

      • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s up to them to figure out how to do it with the least amount of civilian casualty then. Moot point anyway considering nothing has come out with overwhelming proof of Hamas using the hospital as cover.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We already know Hamas is in that hospital and have fired at least one anti-tank rocket out of it.

          There’s also the time Islamic Jihadists fired missiles from right next to a different hospital.

          Hamas has always used civilian infrastructure to attack from, it’s their MO. They want Palestinian civilians to get killed by Israel.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    JERUSALEM (AP) — The head of surgery at Gaza’s largest and most advanced hospital held up his phone Saturday to the hammering of gunfire and artillery shelling.

    “It was the thing we somehow told ourselves wouldn’t happen,” he said, speaking by phone from the central city of Deir al-Balah, where he arrived by foot Friday after escaping what he said were strikes on the hospital with tens of thousands of others.

    “It’s to say, ‘Not only will we kill and wound you, we will ensure you have nowhere to go to be treated,’” said Dr. Ghassan Abu Sitta, a British Palestinian surgeon working for Doctors Without Borders in Gaza City.

    Nonetheless, there must be plenty of warning before attacks to allow for the safe evacuation of patients and medical workers, ICRC legal officer Cordula Droege said.

    Even if Israel succeeds in proving Shifa conceals a Hamas command center, the tenets of international law remain in place, said Jessica Wolfendale, expert in military ethics at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio.

    In an editorial published Friday in Britain’s The Guardian newspaper, International Criminal Court prosecutor Karim Khan issued a warning to combatants that the burden of proof is on them if they claim hospitals, schools or houses of worship have lost their protected status because they are being used for military purposes.


    The original article contains 1,155 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • jray4559@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because someone decided it was such a funny idea to use these places to launch missiles at their enemies.

    Fucking godawful people Hamas are, ruining the lives of 2 million people and assuring untold suffering for probably generations. The sooner those fucks are gone, the better.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, well if bad people did bad thing, that definitely justifies bombing civilians, which totally isn’t a war crime.

  • Quereller@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the ISW report today: Israeli forces fought Palestinian militia fighters near the Square of the Unknown Soldier less than half a kilometer from the al Shifa Hospital complex.[1] A Palestinian journalist reported that the al Qassem Brigades—the military wing of Hamas—ambushed Israeli forces south of the Square of the Unknown Soldier on Shuhada Street.[2] Other Palestinian militia fighters fought Israeli forces on Omar Mukhtar Street, which bounds the square.[3]

    If you build your defense in urban environment you are supposed to evacuate the civilians. This is standard for any half competent army.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you build your defense in urban environment you are supposed to evacuate the civilians. This is standard for any half competent army.

      To where? Gaza is small enough as is, and the whole strip is being bombed by Israel.

      Also, Hamas isn’t an army; they’re a resistance force. Gaza doesn’t have a proper army, which is why they have to resort to asymmetrical warfare.

      • Quereller@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Away from Gaza City were they currently focus their defensive efforts.

        They have a structure and recognition marks, they fall under the Geneva convention as lawful combatants.

        Asymmetrical warfare does not allow you to use perfidy and abuse of a protected status.

  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are hospitals in Gaza under Israel’s crosshairs? Why? Is it truly that difficult to step back and think for a moment about why Israel would want to erase the current populace entirely?

    Amazing, what a mystery

    • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure why you’re being downvoted… Israel an ethnostate, and what we’re seeing here are the early stages of a genocide. Look at any other ethnic cleansing in history, and you’ll easily see the parallels.

      • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, I’m not sure early stages fits, that’s calling for a group to removed and Israel has been bombing water wells, while monopolizing all water supplies and providing only dangerously! small amounts of unclean water. Without question, this has caused unneeded deaths. Simmiliarly for electricity and food supplies.

        It’s tragically been a genocide for a long time.

        • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know, I was trying to tread lightly, lest the Zionist apologists show up to try and redefine “genocide”.

          But the reality is this:

          • Tens of thousands of civilians are being murdered (shot, bombed, starved, water supply poisoned) by Israel’s military.
          • Israel is an ethnostate which believes that their race makes them god’s chosen people.
          • One of the Israeli government cabinet members has declared that the Palestinians in Gaza must be eradicated, and that he would drop a nuclear bomb on Gaze if he could.

          When you use the U.N.’s definition of genocide (“acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”), the picture is pretty clear.

          • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely. I hope I didn’t sound pedantic or talking down, my intent was just to have more details higher in the thread in case some of those zionist shit poster tolls take over the bottom. You’re 100% right on every point and I wish you weren’t.

      • Argonne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel is definitely not an ethnostate. It has 20% Arabs. How many Jews does Palestine have?

        • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Calling a state an Ethnostate doesn’t mean you’re saying the population is entirely of one ethnicity. It means one ethnicity is given a privileged status above all others.

          Israel was founded when Zionists purged Palestinians from their homes and forced them into Gaza and the West Bank in order to create a Jewish majority state. That makes Israel an ethnostate by definition.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israel has a law requiring Jewish people maintain demographic majority.

          It is the definition of an ethno state.

          Not only that, but it is a removed supremacist ethno state.

          Look up how they treat the Beta Israelis.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        War does not automatically equate to being a genocide just because people due. Otherwise, every war in history would.be genocide.

        There are Arabs & Palestinians that serve in the IDF too and have killed Palestinians. There are other Arabs in Jordan and Syria who have also gone to war against Palestine.

        You are using incindiary rhetoric to win an online argument, but your description doesn’t fit the facts.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re literally using the same arguments every genocidal government has used to justify their genocides in history.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I mean there are people in the Israeli Government calling all Palestinians (not just Hamas) “animals”, others who say that Palestinians won’t be allowed to get back to Northern Gaza and there’s even a member of that Government who seriously suggested Israel should nuke Gaza.

      And then, of course, there is the long track record of Israel doing things like murdering journalists and killing Palestinian kids throwing rocks at their armored diggers, especially under governments with these same people in them.

      People who have a track record of murdering journalists and children, bombing hospitals full of those they see as “animals” which they want to see dead or out of Gaza, and then providing to the World some unverifiable excuse that blames somebody else and doesn’t even pass the sniff test when it comes to proportionality in the use of force is hardly out of character, especially because History has various examples of people who think like that going full on mass-murderer in similar ways.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      erase the current populace entirely

      Do you realize that the population of Gaza grows by over 50,000 people every year? Even if we accept the casualty figures provided by Hamas (and I don’t) then unless this war goes on at its current intensity for another four months (which it won’t) the population of Gaza will actually increase rather than decrease in the one-year period that includes the war.

      The idea that the war in Gaza is “[erasing] the current populace entirely” is disconnected from reality.

      • nammi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow.

        Are you literally saying it’s not a genocide because the population is growing faster than the IDF is killing?

        I don’t know what happened to your brain, nor your heart, but I am sad whatever happened to you, happened.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You did use the term “erase.”. What about all the Palestinians living inside Israel.

          Obviously it sucks that people are dying, but hamas started the war FFS. They 100% knew it would cause huge civilian losses.

          • nammi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you think Hamas «started» anything, read up on the history. It’s a 75 year long illegal occupation.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel stated the war 17 years ago, minimum.

            Blockades are acts of war.

            This argument is the adult equivalent of grabbing someone’s hand and punching them in the face with it while saying “stop hitting yourself”

            You should be embarrassed for even making this argument.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel stated the war 17 years ago, minimum.

              *18. The blockade started in late 2005. Just clarifying because Israel likes to claim that the blockade started in response to the scary Hamas government launching rocket attacks.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Civilian casualties aren’t the same thing as genocide.

          genocide: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group

          When a country with access to the full destructive power of a modern-day military (including nuclear weapons) fights a war in such a manner that at the end of the war there will be more enemy civilians than there were before the war, it is entirely unreasonable to claim that genocide or any attempt to commit genocide is taking place. You might as well call it cannibalism or pedophilia - those are also really bad things that Israel isn’t actually doing.

          • nammi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Keep telling yourself whatever you need to support your own narratives. I just wanna let you know that I think you are a cold-hearted person, and I hope that you, your family, or your people will never be thought of, as you are thinking and/or talking of the Palestinians right here.

            They are deliberately bombing hospitals, schools and people fleeing. If you cannot open your eyes to see this, but rather argue about the technicalities of semantics to feel better, I wish you good luck in life.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Intentionally withholding food and water when you control all ingress is a way of extirpating a population without bombing and shooting them.

            But so is dropping more explosive power than the two atomic bombs used in Japan into an area the size of Manhattan in a month.

          • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a false dichotomy. They are killing them as fast as they think the international community will tolerate. They won’t kill them fast enough to provoke any major entity into opposing them, they will just stay firmly in the “everyone will wag their fingers at us and argue about whether it’s right” zone, which is where they sit currently.

            • thatsage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              And what will make you believe genocide isn’t the end goal? The refugees leaving through Egypt don’t?

              • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The refugees leaving through Egypt don’t?

                How could they? Reiterating my prior point:

                They are killing them as fast as they think the international community will tolerate. They won’t kill them fast enough to provoke any major entity into opposing them, they will just stay firmly in the “everyone will wag their fingers at us and argue about whether it’s right” zone, which is where they sit currently.

                So the fact that this leaves open the possibility that some people get to flee their homes in terror, knowing that their friends and loved ones who refuse to be chased out of their homes by Israel are likely to be killed by the IDF, is one of the things that you feel might convince me that Israel doesn’t have genocidal intent?

                And what will make you believe genocide isn’t the end goal?

                Clearly nothing that you’re going to accept.

                • thatsage@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  But that’s impossible to argue. You can claim for any ratio that it’s a silent genocide as long as even a single citizen is killed. And we know a war without civilian casualties - even forgetting the situation of Hamas putting civilians forward as shields and even killing some themselves. Where do you draw the line?

                  Instead of examining the facts, you’re opting for an easy cop-out that requires no proof and cannot be disproved.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes.

            Nothing is more corrosive to an armies fighting capabilities then an occupation.

      • SLaSZT@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, what? Newborn babies can’t shoot a gun and can’t take care of themselves if their homes are bombed and their parents die. Not to mention that half of Gaza is already under 18 and probably won’t be having babies any time soon, given that hospitals are being targeted. What the fuck is wrong with you?

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if we accept the casualty figures provided by Hamas (and I don’t)

        I don’t know why you wouldn’t, unless your justification is just your own bigotry.

        One snippet out of a lengthy article.

        Many experts consider figures provided by the ministry reliable, given its access, sources and accuracy in past statements.

        “Everyone uses the figures from the Gaza Health Ministry because those are generally proven to be reliable,” said Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. “In the times in which we have done our own verification of numbers for particular strikes, I’m not aware of any time which there’s been some major discrepancy.”

        Shakir said Human Rights Watch would not use figures provided by parties with “a propensity to misrepresent information.”

        Why news outlets and the U.N. rely on Gaza’s Health Ministry for death tolls

        And another:

        Throughout four wars and numerous bloody skirmishes between Israel and Hamas, U.N. agencies have cited the Health Ministry’s death tolls in regular reports. The International Committee of the Red Cross and Palestinian Red Crescent also use the numbers.

        In the aftermath of war, the U.N. humanitarian office has published final death tolls based on its own research into medical records.

        In all cases the U.N.’s counts have largely been consistent with the Gaza Health Ministry’s, with small discrepancies.

        — 2008 war: The ministry reported 1,440 Palestinians killed; the U.N. reported 1,385.

        — 2014 war: The ministry reported 2,310 Palestinians killed; the U.N. reported 2,251.

        — 2021 war: The ministry reported 260 Palestinians killed; the U.N. reported 256.

        What is Gaza’s Ministry of Health and how does it calculate the war’s death toll?

      • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t imagine ever having such a cynical and apathetic worldview. All of this death is acceptable to you because more children will be born? Because they’ll be replaced?

        Set a reminder on your calendar for March, and we’ll take a look at the news at that point. I have a sneaking suspicion that you may be surprised. While you’re at it set a reminder to get some therapy too, christ

      • Phanatik@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do realise that the birth rates will slow down during the conflict, right? Who’s going to be having a baby when the nearest hospital is being shelled? Assuming of course that both parents even survive.

        That 50,000 per year won’t hold for this duration and I won’t be surprised if it shrinks to below 1,000 by the time Israel is finished.

  • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s two kinds of people; ones that use human shields and ones that are deterred by them. Atleast to a point.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel uses human shields. Operation Cast lead is what human shields looks like.

      Stop justifying war crime in defense of an apartheid ethno state trying to commit genocide.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was 15 years ago, and I see absolutely no mention of Israeli human shields anywhere regarding Cast Lead.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/mde150152009en.pdf

          Page 48.

          Israel does a good job of making the world forget their actions.

          According to testimonies, in several cases Israeli forces also forced unarmed Palestinian civilian males (mostly adults but in two cases also children) to serve as “human shields”, including making them walk in front of armed soldiers; go into buildings to check for booby traps or gunmen; and inspect suspicious objects for explosives. These practices are not new. Numerous such cases have been documented in recent years and the Israeli Supreme Court has ruled that such practices contradict International law and prohibited them in October 2005.73

      • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s no accident Hamas keeps their HQ’s and ammunition depots near civilian population aswell as regularly shoots rockets from near mosks and hospitals. They know Israel is atleast trying to minimize civilian casualties so they’re probably not going to just level that building without a warning as they would if it was located in the desert.

        If Hamas had the military capabilities that Israel does and Israel would put their military HQ in the basement of Israeli hospital hoping to use their own population as human shields Hamas could not care less. They would level that building in a heartbeat and collateral damage would just be a bonus.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Hamas killed around 1100 israelis on Oct 7.

          Israel killed at least 122 of the 1200 themselves. Most likely more

          350 of the israelis killed were IDF

          This mean the civilian casualty rate was around 70%. On Oct 7.

          Hamas has a far better civilian casualty rate than America which goes around 80-90 while committing their supposed genocide attack. This is not an accident you can realize by blind firing into civilian areas.

          Purely from these numbers we can conclude in ACTIONS not words that Hamas takes decent care to avoid civilian deaths even when attacking. Far better than israel which just bombs everything that moves.

          • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel has the capability to level both Gaza and West bank in a week and kill every single person in there. They haven’t. What would Hamas do if they had this capability?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              If they actually did that the entirety of West Asia and North Africa would attack them and all their allies would abandon them.

              So actually, no, Israel doesn’t have that capability.

              • rigatti@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                You seem to have a different understanding of capability than I do. They could do it, so they have the capability, but that says nothing about the consequences.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, they would be dogpiled as they did it. They wouldn’t be able to finish the job before the whole world ate them alive.