• Punkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I married my first wife when she was 18 and I was 20. We went through a lot of hardship. It should not have worked out: we were both poor, from broken homes, in an LDR from different worlds. She was the popular girl, I was a shy and awkward nerd. When we got married, we had only been in one another’s presence for a few weeks total. I went into the marriage not expecting a path or plan, as my parents were toxic which ended with my mother’s suicide, and my mother in law had been married 4 times before she became single for the last time. None of us had healthy marriages to draw from. At our wedding, her relatives even said, “I give it two years, tops.” We were desperately poor, and struggled most of our marriage with health and money issues.

    But we made it work for 25 years. We’d still be married, but she passed away ten years ago. We became “foxhole buddies,” us against the world.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have neither insight nor retorts to offer, I just wanted to congratulate you on 25 years. Hell, even 5 years with someone who’d dig in with you is worthy of praise in this world. I’m glad you found your foxhole buddy, and I wish you all the best.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I swear some people go out of their way to judge others for the most ridiculous things. Maybe try asking yourself why you are not happy about people finding love without going through half a dozen shitty relationships.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        So you go from about a 1/2 chance of divorce to about a 1/2 chance of divorce. Got it.

        Sounds more like age doesn’t really matter and emotional maturity matters more.

        • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The difference between 35% and 60% isn’t insignificant…

          I mean you’re not wrong about emotional maturity but the less years you’ve been alive, the less time you’ve had to emotionally mature

          • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just on the math rq, 25% almost certainly means 25% of the risk is reduced… therefore 60%->45%

            • fkn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Depends/sometimes… If it’s like you said then 25% of that 60% and you get 60-15=45. If it’s some rando looking at 60% total and 35% total and they go “oh neat one of these numbers is 25 bigger/smaller!” Then maybe not?

    • Adramis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      For real. This post has big “I have regrets and/or fears that I missed out on my younger life, and the only way to not be afraid is to invalidate other people’s choices” energy. Every life and every combination of experiences produces a unique piece of art. OP, your life is valid and worthwhile - you don’t have to tear other people down for that to be the case.

      • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh I have issues with commitment and a constant feeling of ‘Is this the best I can expect?’ but I don’t regret my younger life.

        My ‘weird’ sentiment stems more from me looking in from the outside at relationships where 20 year olds decide they want to spend the rest of their lives with each other. I can’t imagine missing out on potentially meeting someone more compatible. Can you really meet the most compatible person for you when you’re 20?

        When I was 20 I was a very different person, I’m assuming that’s similar for others.

        Other commenters have talked about how they grow with partners but I wonder if it’s truly possible to do that while being so ‘together’ with another person. Some things you have to learn on your own.

        • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Just because you matured late doesn’t mean everyone else does, a lot of ppl are exceptionally emotionally mature by the age of 16 or 17 as well, you should always take a decision based on your maturity level and someone elderlys opinion who also knows you well, like your parents, they probably have a good idea

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I honestly don’t know who you’re talking about. I don’t find most adults to even be mature people, especially in relationships. The main thing keeping adult relationships alive is just that they spend most of their time apart from their partner at work.

            This is anecdotal but everyone I’ve ever met that made a high school relationship work didn’t make it work through “maturity”. They were just committed. Often, they were extremely immature and naive and were bonded by the hardships of their 20s.

            Go ahead and ask people who were together when they were younger and made it work. I’ve never heard any of them say they were mature and knew what they were doing.

            • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Fair point, I think it is just that you should be mature enough to work with you partner together, or atleast one person should be at that time, and if they really love each other, then good

              • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                The way I think about it is that the core idea is that you will stick together with your partner through everything and grow together. Most high schoolers don’t go in with that idea, they just have strong enough emotional connections that they stumble into that.

                The maturity part of being an adult is knowing that’s what you should do and knowing how to do it without hurting the other person in the process.

                It’s like dancing. If someone really wants to dance with you, they’ll be patient as you find your rhythm and you both learn to dance. Feet get stepped on but it’s the same dance. Getting older doesn’t teach you to dance. Being young doesn’t mean you aren’t light on your feet. Maturity in relationships is knowing most of the wrong moves and never dropping your partner.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can be happy and find love without marrying someone.

      Like i think most people would say its weird to marry someone the day after you meet them for the first time, right? Is that you hating peoples happiness and love? or is that you being a realest that that marriage probably wont last and will just be messy for both people?

      • Bunnylux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        That doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad thing though. Divorce doesn’t have to be traumatic, and it should be more normalized.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wow, really? Sure is an expensive and necessarily painful thing to opt into or to normalize. I’d rather it be normalized to not get married in the first place.

          • naught@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think a divorce is like $80 where I am, but if you have to go to court obvs it’s a lot more. I spent almost nothing on my wedding, granted it was just friends and was an elopement. Marriage has big tax advantages for some, and it’s the only way my spouse was getting health insurance to survive this godforsaken wasteland. It also guarantees that they get a slice of my income if the unforeseeable happens and we split so they can survive.

            I think people should not see marriage as the end goal, but be pragmatic about its costs and benefits, which I think you are getting at too

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            When he says normalize, he’s not saying it is something that people should seek out. In case that was somehow taken that way.

            The problem is there is immense social pressure, especially against women, to never have a divorce. It is seen as a failure, whereas sometimes it is simply the result of circumstances beyond our control or is just something one person, or maybe both, need in their lives.

            I am happily married. Like many people we have had our ups and downs. Every couple should do everything they can to repair their relationship and make it work. But sometimes it’s just not enough. Sometimes you weren’t supposed to be together, sometimes one person has some issue that they just will never resolve, sometimes you find out things about your partner or things emerged down the line. We are not prescient, things change. So people should feel very comfortable divorcing without all of the social baggage that comes with it. Because divorce is inevitable, it is never going to go away. And it is a viable decision for one to make.

            As for marriage, you don’t have to participate and to say you just want it to go away is kind of ridiculous because we both know that is not going to happen. So we deal with reality and accept that divorce is part of the marriage landscape.

          • Bunnylux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s not that expensive, I did it for $400 amicably. We had a fun time while married and I don’t regret it. Why not just make it easier for people to do what they want and not punish young people for making decisions.

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or just be a couple? Save yourselves and everyone else in the families the money and mental energy.

  • ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It goes up. Now I think people that get married before 40 are weird.

    On serious note… It’s any age. You can tell when a couple is just trying to reproduce an image of “family” because they were told it’s the next thing to do in life. Working in retail id often see families you could tell just went through the motions and that everyone was disconnected from one another. It’s sad.

  • Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Imagine the following scenario: you meet someone in college, and when you graduate at 22 you don’t want to split up. They say sure, let’s live together, but we need to get engaged; if it doesn’t work out we can just break it off. After a year you realize your lives are much better together. You decide to get married but not to have kids until you’re 30. If it doesn’t work out you can divorce, but you sign a prenup and at least no kids would be involved.

    If you both have clear and compatible career goals, that scenario saves you a lot of dating drama and gives you valuable support. I wouldn’t call someone in that scenario “weird.”

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the main point here is people around those ages aren’t fully capable of making those kinds of decisions in the first place.

      There’s a reason why most marriages end in divorce after all.

      Get married before you have a clue. Get a clue after being married a couple years. Get a divorce because you realize you had no idea what you were doing.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wife an I met and got married when I was 25 and she was 19. We had some life experience and knew what we wanted. 15 years later, it’s still amazing, we’re still best friends and inseparable. When I met her I got this weird feeling, like I met someone I had somehow known all my life. It felt like I met my wife in a past life, and was immediately like “oh there you are!” When I met her in this one.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I maintain that I was married to her in a past life. From our first date we clicked immediately. It felt like I was back into a groove with someone I’ve known forever. She came over to stay at my place for the weekend after like our 4th date, she never left. We’ve been living together since like 3 weeks after meeting, and we have never regretted it. We have kids and love each other and our life immensely.

  • nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 months ago

    The age at which you meet has nothing to do with it. Healthy relationships are about evolving together. If you can’t do that or if you do it separately, that’s when it falls apart. Sometimes you’re lucky and you find a compatible person early, sometimes you don’t. That’s all there is to it.

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m in my mid-50s. The generation older than me - my aunts and uncles - generally were in school until grade 8 and were out of the house and working by 16. My mother had her older sister as her teacher.

    24 is not a child. You can vote drive, drive, drink, marry sign legal documents etc. And at least for women fertility begins to decline at 32. If you mean you will continue to grow as a person and develop new interests that hopefully never goes away. I went to grad school and was in academia for over a decade after my PhD. I have made two major shifts in my career since then. Old people still feel like they are in their twenties or early thirties mentally, we joke about it all the time. So congratulations, this is it.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. There was a point when I was thinking I’d keep this account professional and share it with my students. Unlike my other social media accounts. lol

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t do that. Lol. My partner is a professor herself. You don’t want to share this stuff with your students. Professional social media is overrated

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I didn’t in the end. It was mostly because I don’t want undocumented interactions. I have a hard enough time getting them to use office hours.

    • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      at least for women fertility begins to decline at 32.

      That’s a little bit of a yikes there, buddy.

      Edit: and additional “yikes” for all of the people that don’t see the problem with assigning a value to women based on how fertile they may or may not be.

      Edit 2: tHe QuAnTiTy Of EgGs! Because women only exist to get pregnant.

      • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        How can a fact be yikes? It’s only relevant if women want children, but if they do then the earlier the safer it is.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        They said nothing about the value of a woman being tied to fertility, that came out of mind…

        As for the decline in fertility statement, that has been scientifically proven for decades and assumed for centuries. Women are born with a set amount of eggs, they typically go through at least one per ovulation cycle, they start reaching the end in their 30s and risks of birth defects start increasing in their 30s

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why is that a yikes? More birth defects, complications, start running low on eggs. All of that is just facts…

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The question was about marriage. There are two reasons that I see people get married. For young people it’s about starting a family. However you and I feel about it personally, legal structures that are in place just make it easier when you’re married. The other reason is for older people. Pensions and estate planning is easier for married couples. Again, I have opinions about it but it remains a plain fact.

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I got married to share healthcare and other tax advantages and do not plan to have children. I’m under 30 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I envy you. My partner and I are DINKs. There has never been a tax break aimed at our demographic. lol.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maturity plays a much more important role than age. Some people are never fit to marry, some have what it takes by the time they are 16/17. It’s not often that it plays out well for the youngest ones, and since each year brings new experiences and understandings each year moves along the bell curve of “marriage readiness”. So is it more likely that a 24 year old is more ready for marriage than a 18 year old. Yes. Is it guaranteed? No. I know some 50/60 year olds that still aren’t ready for marriage. They just never learned the skills it takes to have a healthy marriage. Giving an age as a hard cutoff is too arbitrary a measure. Age doesn’t guarantee shit.

    • TakuWalker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s it, end of thread. Maturity plays such an important factor it’s astonishing it’s not the first thing being discussed instead of an arbitrary number.

  • dlrht@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    At what age are you supposed to know what you want for the rest of your life? You will never have an answer to that in any capacity, and not just in marriage. You evolve as a person, you’ll never have a fixed desire for your whole life. And that’s the great thing about marriage and relationships, they also evolve. And it’s about who you want to try doing that with

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You evolve all the time, but you might have some desires that are fixed for your whole life and you might realize it before you’re an adult.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I feel like it might come from the fact most relationships are pretty short before you are 24. Few people hold onto long lasting relationships by that age and few (at the time) short ones develop into anything reliable.

      A former classmate of mine met a guy and got married after knowing him almost a year, like right out of highschool. Last I heard of her they went through a messy divorce couple of years later, which we all saw coming and tried telling her about.

      • dlrht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        That sounds more like an issue with that person not being open/receptive to her peers advice. And I think this is true for many people beyond the age of 24 as well

  • zanyllama52@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    Seems like 24 is an arbitrary number. Some folks consider themselves “ready” for marriage at 18, some at 40, and some never.

    I think its very subjective and situational.

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can we stop extending “just a kid” into ever older years? Society already years anybody under 18 like they’re the same as a goddamn fetus. Human life expectancy being what it is, we shouldn’t be treating people… not even like they don’t know anything but like they couldn’t even conceivably know anything for fully a third of it.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know how it is for you, but when I look back at 24-year-old me, I am not impressed. I guess what I’m saying is that there are a lot of us who definitely don’t have their shit together when they’re 24. They say your prefrontal cortex isn’t fully developed until 25 at the earliest, but I feel like it was closer to 30 for me. Granted, I’m kind of a dummy anyway, so this probably doesn’t apply to everyone.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just wait. 45 year old me was cringe. And 35 year old me? How did that guy even have friends.

      • Risk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        That reads as “I couldn’t make those decisions at that age, so obviously no one else could.”

        I say this as someone that had my first child at 23, after talking about it with my girlfriend since the age of 19.

        We don’t regret a thing. (Well, apart from not winning the lottery. Yet.)

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t look at other people as if they are or were me, I look at them as if they are their own people who may or may not be living their life differently from me.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is 18 years a third of your life given todays life span?

      Where do you live where the expected life span is just 56? O.o

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 months ago

    Me 32, i dont have a fucking clue of what i want for the rest of my life. Maybe those couples that married in their early 20s wanted to explore together what they wanted in life. Good for them.

    • Oka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I understand the roots of marriage, but I want a partner who would be ok with parting ways in the future. We live once, why do we have to commit to 1 person for most of it? Things I enjoyed 5 years ago I don’t care for now. Tastes change.

      • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Marriage isn’t for everybody, and that’s okay. As long as you aren’t stringing partners along who are looking to get married when you already know that you aren’t, then your choice doesn’t seem to be hurting anybody.

        I’m 35 and married. Sure, tastes change, but my wife and I chose good partners in each other; we won’t hate each other or get irreparably sick of each other, we make a great team, and we understand each other’s limitations and are mature enough to ask for help. We let each other in. There is security and stability in marriage. I’m not great at meeting new people, so not having to go on another first date again is a huge relief for me. Making a good first impression is fucking exhausting. In contrast, I know how my wife is feeling pretty much just by glancing at her, and it’s really fulfilling to be on the same wavelength as my partner like that, especially because we’re also open communicators who can share the honest, fucked up feelings without worrying about judgment. So we’re basically each other’s therapist, but we share housework and meals and money, and we snuggle and kiss and fuck. I can understand that that’s not appealing to everybody, but it’s hard for me to imagine a version of myself who doesn’t want this. But again, it’s not for everybody, and it’s perfectly okay to not want it for yourself.

        • Oka@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Now that’s a healthy relationship. I agree marriage isn’t for some, just like having kids isn’t for some. To each their own, perhaps my views will change in the future.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not going to try to change your mind about this opinion, but I’ll take a stab at shaming you for being so vocal about a thought that is very much “othering”. Maybe turn down the judgement a bit, you don’t know people.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s truly insane is people who marry under 20. And if you think it’s possible to know who you are and what you want at that age, you have a very simplistic view of the world. Or you’re brainwashed by those who reared you, ie you have a very simplistic view of the world.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, teenagers are often gifted with some nugget of wisdom or other about their lives, it’s just that parents and random commenters online never believe it.

        I knew I wanted to get married and to whom. I also knew it was a good idea. I only waited to mid-twenties because she wasn’t sure. 30 years farther along, we’re still married and teenaged me is proved right.

        Cynical, older, slower me might have screwed it up somehow.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m happy that it worked out for you. I think you got lucky. I don’t think most people are mature enough to make such a call at 20yo.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Of course I was lucky. The decisions we make around starting a family can reverberate for centuries. Even if we had enough information (we don’t), I don’t think people are mature enough at any age to make the right call,

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Do whatever you want. Maybe your marriage will last, maybe it won’t. Live your life. Take chances.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m sorry you have to deal with that. I have lived with a persistent background anxiety for my whole life, and only in the last year have I started treating it (in my 40’s). It hasn’t solved all my problems, but it does mean I’m not constantly jittery. If you’re already treating your anxiety, then I can only wish you luck and success.

  • charles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I see a pretty stark difference between people who married young and had kids right away, vs people who married young and enjoyed their time for a while before having kids. The ones who had kids seem weird to me, never got a chance to goof off in their 20s and figure out who they are. The ones who waited feel more normal. But that’s just my experience.

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      The ones who had kids seem weird to me, never got a chance to goof off in their 20s and figure out who they are.

      I definitely needed to goof off in my 20s and figure out who I was. But not everybody is like that, and the meme in question suggests it’s “weird” to know who you are and not need to goof off.

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How old are you? No need to be specific this isn’t a creepy question lol just roughly what age are you? Because I don’t think we can make any sort of broad assessment until the people who had kids when they were young have kids out of the house. I know plenty
      of people who are enjoying their 40’s with kids happily going off to college around that time. If you have kids in your early to mid 30’s - assuming you stopped at 35, which isn’t a given - you’re starting to have them out in your mid 50’s. Those are very different times for you, physically, mentally, professionally, etc. even if it doesn’t seem like it.

      I imagine for many in this thread it is too early to be making a final assessment. I think also a lot of people here forget that nobody is thrusting these decisions upon them (except maybe overeager parents who want to be grandparents, in which case they need to back off). Different people have different objectives/goals in life. They aren’t worse off for not doing it your way.

      The strongest marriage I know is my buddy from high school who married his high school sweetheart, right when they graduated college at 21. They just had their 3rd kid at 35 and they’re ecstatic. First was at 22 or so.

      The point is a post like this shows a certain amount of hubris/lack of imagination/lack of exposure to people with different lifestyles and priorities.

    • Alivrah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is the main point here, IMO. A child is a huge responsibility and the early 20s is a period of life you’re still figuring things out. Culture also plays a role here; where I’m from, people are deciding to live together (without having kids) for a couple of years before formally marrying.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Having a kid in your 20s is not for you, but you can’t just assume that that is the case for everyone else.

        I mean, let’s take this post: what is so magical about 24? Why not 25? Why not 23? I imagine the number was pretty arbitrary. It just sounded right to OP.