Fridge failures: LG says angry owners can’t sue, company points to cardboard box::NBC Bay Area’s Consumer team filed a report focused on faulty fridges, and then, viewers responded resoundingly about their own refrigerator problems…
LG effectively has said that their owners manual and a cardboard box have authority over the courts. Clearly, as the courts have nullified it, they fucking dont.
All I see is a damned good reason to ban arbitration agreements outright. If you want to arbitrate a tort, you should be required to motion the court for it.
I agree. I think arbitration should be limited to one-off cases, not class action lawsuits because you sell a faulty product.
It shouldn’t be allowed for contracts of adhesion (take or leave it contracts for consumers). Mandatory binding arbitration should be limited to business to business negotiated contracts.
Arbitration should be allowed any time, never mandatory. Among other things, this would help balance the overwhelming power of the corp since they would want to encourage arbitration treating you fairly there
Yeah, by the time you even received the agreement, it’s already bought and usually delivered and or installed.
Reminds of that video of Louis Rossmann where he says something like: if a company writes something in small print and/or on places where people won’t look, it’s because the company knows they would lose customers and damage their PR if people knew about it.
Aside of being legal or not, if LG really wanted their customers to be aware of their BS, maybe they should have put a big ass plastic warning sticker in the front of the fridge itself, preferably holding the door/s locked or on the inside, somewhere annoying where nobody would miss it.
I agree with that guy a LOT but something rubs me the wrong way with him
I think it’s because he’s such a staunch capatilist
Serious question. How is he a staunch capitalist if he is always advocating for right to repair? For consumer rights?
Consumers having rights doesn’t change the type of economic system. You could have consumer rights under feudalism and that would still be feudalism. The right to mend you own fence wouldn’t make your feudal lord any less of your feudal lord. Heck and that example is even a worker right not a consumer one.
He is in the third-party repair business, so it makes sense for him to promote right to repair to protect his industry.
That, and as he often says, in an ideal capitalist world for both producer and consumer, the best way to retain business is to keep the customer happy, and an easy way to do that is to produce a quality product and not screw the consumer over, lest the product break or total itself and the customer go elsewhere for repair or replacement of the broken product. Satisfied customers in the first initial sale can lead to those customers returning often and recommending the business and product to others, leading to much more business (and profit) overall.
He is in the third-party repair business, so it makes sense for him to promote right to repair to protect his industry.
That, and as he often says, in an ideal capitalist world for both producer and consumer, the best way to retain business is to keep the customer happy, and an easy way to do that is to produce a quality product and not screw the consumer over, lest the product break or total itself and the customer go elsewhere for repair or replacement of the broken product. Satisfied customers in the first initial sale can lead to those customers returning often and recommending the business and product to others, leading to much more business (and profit) overall.
Hmm, that sounds expensive. How about I give you a shoddy bomb casing filled with used pinball machine parts and put off worrying about any repercussions until next quarter?
You gotta know he has a fleet of bitcoin miners sucking down the equivalent of a small countries energy needs.
yeah the guy is insufferable and always trying to promote their own business.
These motors have been a knows issue in refrigeration for a long time now. A lot longer than just 3 or 4 years. Meanwhile I have a 15 year old fridge/freezer still going great and a full size upright deep freeze in the garage that’s like 30 years old.
Bullshit, then I still don’t know until after I bought it, took delivery, and “agreed to” whatever they decide to post there
It should need to be visible on the sales demo, and the online listing, so I do have an opportunity to look for an alternative
Lol.
Any judge worth his salt will ask LG for proof the consumer agreed to arbitration.
LG will say that by opening the box they agreed to the terms, Microsoft started that one.
That’s not proof.
What if the delivery company opened it? What if the consumer didn’t see it?
Prove the consumer read it. LG has no signed document, nothing, proving the consumer read and agreed to this.
A software license is different - when installing you click on a button saying “I agree”.
There has been legal precedent that terms of use are not legally binding since they don’t expect customers to read it before clicking the I Agree button. They have made the agreements so long and put them in everything that they concluded there is no possible way anybody would ever read all of it for everything.
Not only that, but your average consumer isn’t very well versed in legalese to actually understand everything in them.
A software license is different - when installing you click on a button saying “I agree”.
Not different, because nobody knows who has installed the software.
Or even more: when I got my car, the kids were the first ones to play with the entertainment system, and they clicked many “I agree” buttons. But a kid’s agreement is legally void.
Shitty life pro tips, get your kids to click I agree to licence terms so they’re legally void
If you can - always have your children agree to all contracts.
They are legally protected from all contracts except Student Loans Debt. Thanks Biden.
The licenses should be void because you had no opportunity to read and understand before purchasing, and they are wording them as a contract when they are unilaterally imposed
Good point.
As someone who’s deployed thousands of apps using MOM/SMS/SCOM, am I responsible for those agreements? Lol
A software license is different - when installing you click on a button saying “I agree”.
I did no such thing. Maybe my cat walked on the keyboard. Maybe I skipped over it with a debugger. Or maybe I did click on the button, but it did not constitute a legal meeting of the minds because I already owned the goddamn thing and it was nothing more than a mechanical step necessary to use my property!
Clickwrap agreements for software are no different at all. They’re just as much bullshit as this nonsense LG is trying to pull, and always have been.
Hahahaha, I like your cat!
Yea, I didn’t apply the same logic. Again, the complainant would have to prove you clicked agree.
Last night the TV I’ve had for three years stopped working until I agreed to their terms of service, including their personal data sales. There was no opportunity to disagree, nor anything I could do with the TV until I did. You could prove I read it, but it’s ridiculous to claim I agreed to it before buying it or that I had any leverage for fair treatment.
I suppose I shouldn’t have had my TV on the network but it has an Apple TV app and my Firestick doesn’t
Stories like this are why I will NEVER buy a TV with built-in smart features. Its only job is to take signals and produce pictures and sound. These days, I don’t even need a TV tuner. If I have to pay for a giant monitor instead, that’s fine, I’ll just wait until I can afford it, or buy smaller.
Uggh, I hate that crap on my TV.
I reset my TV recently… Except apparently I didn’t because it came right back with all my settings. Dammit, I said RESET. wtf.
(Yea, apparently Samsung and others use a feature that once it gets network, it connects to Samsung servers and pulls the config back down if it’s on the same net. Wtf??)
I hate LG more than any other company after dealing with their worst in class customer service when I bought a defective TV a couple years back.
It took 6 months of actively calling them and then creating a Twitter account and tweeting at their PR team and emailing the CEO to get my money back on the piece of junk.
Multiple hour+ long calls. Each time where I had to tell them everything from the previous calls that was supposed to be entered in their system, and was, but the call person literally didn’t look at the screen in front of them. An hour long wait on hold to the claims department where someone picked up and then audibly hung up.
It was infuriating. But I had a $2,000 piece of junk in my house so I wasn’t going to let it drop.
Shit like this is why I use my credit card for big purchases like that. Your shit doesn’t work and you fuck around making it right? I’ll get a charge back and you can deal with the credit card company because I ain’t got time for that shit.
Haven’t had to pull that card very many times, but its very nice when the business fucking me around suddenly really wants to make it right so they don’t have to deal with the impacts of a charge back.
It’s amazing what happens when you mention chargeback to all these shitty companies and how quickly they change their tune.
Charge backs cost them money in fees but more importantly - enough charge backs will increase their fees/penalties/required balances and in excess - remove their ability to take payments entirely.
Arbitration clauses need to be banned, at least for regular consumer purchases.
But thanks to lobbying, that will never happen.
But at least I know never to ever buy anything from LG and Kenmore.
Everyone thinks the US is a litigious society, but it’s the consequence of our political order. The lack of regulations are “compensated” by the right to tort. In many instances, there is no authority to enforce rights, only the ability to sue. The Americans with Disabilities Act works this way. (and there are many calling to remove that option, making the entire law theoretical)
Of course, the idea is that lawsuits will discourage people from getting redress because of the high-bar to enter a case into the legal system. But that wasn’t enough, so the capitalists are trying to take that away too.
There are few things more obscene under capitalism than a privatized court system.
Had one of their fridges a while back with their proprietary compressor design. It kicked the bucket at about 2-3 years old. All appliance repair shops that I contacted in my area, including an LG-certified one, declined repairs. Most of them even immediately asked if it was an LG when I asked if they did compressor replacements to head me off at the pass. It was a good product while it worked, but that’s only half the equation.
Had an lg fridge shit the bed after a year or so.
Samsung did the same after a year.
Fuck them both.
Chinese OEMs will steal the share
I know that Chinese brands have a bad reputation, but there are some really good products they make too. I have an ice cream maker (compressor based) that’s both cheaper than any of the traditional brands but also has a really fantastic build quality. It wouldn’t surprise me if over time some of the Chinese brands start to target western consumers more, and if they actually deliver quality products while the traditional brands aren’t then they might gain significant market share.
I have one of these fridges that failed. It was delivered and installed initially…I never saw the box. How does that factor in? Plus don’t buy LG, it’s a shit company.
A million years ago I worked for ATT wireless, and had to shill their (circa 2006) crap phones.
Not a brand I’m a fan of even all these years later.
A[n LG] spokesman said, "our focus on customer satisfaction is paramount.”
Ok, that got a solid laugh out of me.
My parents have a LG fridge and so far it’s still running strong
Is it the newer recent fridges with defects or models from a specific country ?
Mine is about 7 years old. 2 years ago the compressor died on it. It was a new custom LG design. The part normally lasts 10 years.
I was out of warranty but LG still fixed it apparently due to a class action lawsuit forcing them to cover the compressor specifically due to all the failures.
Take what you will from that.
