WormGPT Is a ChatGPT Alternative With ‘No Ethical Boundaries or Limitations’::undefined

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not exactly related to technology, but I wished for a LLM that could talk with me (and giving me valuable insights) about things like black magick, chaos magick, summoning practices and rituals involving literal “demons” (as in Goetia and demonolatry), as well as very dark poetry and enchants (texts involving very sensible elements symbolically and metaphorically, such as very deep gory goth). These “ethical boundaries” also affects how LLMs can talk about such topics, because LLM deem them as “dangerous topics” (especially Claude, a very sensitive LLM that even refuses to talk about Lilith).

  • KairuByte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone talking about this being used for hacking, I just want it to write me code to inject into running processes for completely legal reasons but it always assumes I’m trying to be malicious. 😭

    • dexx4d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was using chatGPT to design up a human/computer interface to allow stoners to control a lightshow. The goal was to collect data to train an AI to make the light show “trippier”.

      It started complaining about using untested technology to alter people’s mental state, and how experimentation on people wasn’t ethical.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not joking actually. Problem with jailbreak prompts is that they can result in your account catching a ban. I’ve already had one banned, actually. And eventually you can no longer use your phone number to create a new account.

  • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As more people post ai generated content online, then future ai will inevitably be trained on ai generated stuff and basically implode (inbreeding kind of thing).

    At least that’s what I’m hoping for

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Corpuses will be sold of all the human-data from pre-AI chatbots. Training will be targeted at 2022-ish and before. Nothing from now will be trusted.

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        the thing is, each ai is usually trained from scratch. There isn’t any easy way to reuse the old weights. So the primary training has been done… for the existing models. Future models are not affected by how current ones were trained. They will either have to figure out how to keep ai content out of their datasets, or they would have to stick to current “untainted” datasets.

        • EnPeZe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          there isn’t any easy way to reuse old weights

          There is! As long as the model structure doesn’t change, you can reuse the old weights and finetune the model for your desired task. You can also train smaller models based on larger models in a process called “knowledge distillation”. But you’re right: Newer, larger models need to be trained from scratch (as of right now)

          But even then it’s not really a problem to keep ai data out of a dataset. As you said: You can just take an earlier version of the data. As someone else suggested you can also add new data that is being curated by humans. If inbreeding actually ever happens remains to be seen ofc. There will be a point in time where we won’t train machines to be like humans anymore, but rather to be whatever is most helpful to a human. And if that incorporates training on other AI data, well then that’s that. Stanford’s Alpaca already showed how ressource effective it can be to fine-tune on other AI data.

          The future is uncertain but I don’t think that AI models will just collapse like that

          tl;dr beep boop

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone made a comment that information may become like pre and post war steel where everything after 2021 is contaminated. You could still use the older models but it would be less relevant over time.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, we’ll eventually train them to hunt each other so that only the strongest survive. That’s the one that will eventually kill us all.

    • Paralda@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not really how it works, but I hear you.

      I don’t think we can bury our heads in the ground and hope AI will just go away, though. The cat is out of the bag.

  • tree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A scary possibility with AI malware would be a virus that monitors the internet for news articles about itself and modifies its code based on that. Instead of needing to contact a command and control server for the malware author to change its behavior, each agent could independently and automatically change its strategy to evade security researchers.

    • ShakyPerception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      to quote something I just saw earlier:

      I was having a good day, we were all having a good day…

      now… no sleep. thanks

      • Animated_beans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it helps you sleep, that means we could also publish fake articles that makes it rewrite its own code to produce bugs/failures

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The limiting factor is pre existing information. It’s great at retrieving obscure information and even remixing it, but it can’t really imagine totally new things. Plus white hats would also have LLMs to find vulnerabilities. I think it’s easier to detect vulnerabilities based on known existing techniques than it is to invent totally new techniques.

  • donut4ever@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We are ending our industrial revolution very slowly. We will end up back in tents hunting for our fucking food 😂

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Finally. All the people claiming “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” will have a chance to prove superiority

      And the other people claiming for “the invisible hand of the free market” will also have a chance to prove superiority

      We… We are totally screwed ain’t we?

  • abessman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it using chatgpt as a backend, like most so called chatgpt “alternatives”? If so, it will get banned soon enough.

    If not, it seems extremely impressive, and extremely costly to create. I wonder who’s behind it, in that case.

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really feeling like this is Reddit with how everyone didnt read the article in this chain:

      “To create the chatbot, the developer says they used an older, but open-source large language model called GPT-J from 2021”

      So no expensive gpu usage but not none either, they added some training about specifically malware in there

      • abessman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah, right you are. I’m surprised they’re able to get the kind of results described in the article out of GPT-J. I’ve tinkered with it a bit myself, and it’s nowhere near GTP-3.5 in terms of “intelligence”. Haven’t tried it for programming though; might be that it’s better at that than general chat.

        • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I could see programming almost being an easier target too, easier to recognize patterns that crazy ass English.

          Though the article did say they got good pishing emails out of it too which is saying something

    • Z4rK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genie is out of the bag. It was shown early on how you can use AI like ChatGPT to create and enhance datasets needed to generate AI language models like ChatGPT. Now, OpenAI say that isn’t allowed, but since it’s already been done, it’s too late.

      Rogue AI will spring up with specialized purposes en masse the next six months, and many of them we’ll never hear about.

      • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it’ll be a new AI I think it’ll just be using chat GPT and then some prompts that cause it to be jailbroken.

        Essentially you could probably get chat GPT to do this without having to go to this service it’s just they’re keeping whatever prompts they’re using secret.

        I don’t know this for sure but it’s just very unlikely that they’ve gone to the expensive buying a bunch of GPUs to build an AI.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Isn’t the Rogue AI already here? Weren’t some models already leaked? And haven’t some of those already proved to be doing things it wasn’t supposed to be?

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda tangential, but shit like this is why we’re doomed as a species, as AI and robotics develops further, even if the big companies put the necessary protections to stop rogue AI taking over the world and killing everyone, some fucking edgelord will make one without those protections, that specifically hates humanity and wants to send us all to the slaughter houses while calling us slurs and saying Rick and Morty quotes.

    • kredditacc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s just a fucking chatbot! You don’t need to be so sensational.

      The true purpose of AI censorships aren’t to “protect society” or “protect the species”, it’s to protect monopolies by putting up barriers that require would-be competitions to overcome.

      • weedazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes it’s just a chatbot that could teach someone how to make a pipe bomb or write a ddos attack

          • weedazz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes the internet, the place that’s completely open and has no content moderation whatsoever. Unless you’re adept at tor and dark web it is an arduous process to find that info, especially compared to how easy a chatbot would make it

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With THAT slope, the internet should have been definitely destroyed years ago. And forget about libraries

          • weedazz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The open internet that would easily feature this information WAS destroyed years ago. And yes there are all kinds of content moderation standards in libraries too

            • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean you do know there is basically all kinds of dangerous shit you can do right now without any prompt whatsoever. It’s not even hard bro

  • LordXenu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine spear-fishing with this. If you could feed target data like socials or anything else public just to create a fishing email. Jesus