• aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 months ago

      He put up Tesla stock to finance Xitter, so I’m guessing these effing ridiculous demands for salary and bonus are his attempt to backtrack out of that debt. He must be hurting behind the scenes. OhNoAnyway.jpg …

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if he calls a factory-wide meeting, he’s not going to get as many people laughing at his “humor” and telling him what a genius he is compared to Twitter.

      And that’s all he really cares about.

      So yeah, he’s very motivated to seek out attention from sycophants.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    5 months ago

    A motivated Elon produced the Cubertruck and replaced the Autonomous Driving ladar sensors with low resolution cameras. A motivated Elon turned Twitter into Xitter. I’m just saying that maybe you want to avoid a motivated Elon.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 months ago

      A motivated-Elon is why sales of Teslas are declining while other EV sales are up by double digits.

    • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Honestly I wish he would ‘leave’ SpaceX too.

      I caught his livestream for the latest Starship launch, and he literally introduced the event with a 10-minute speech on “saving your life” by buying crypto, and how they would match your crypto if you used his link or something. WTF was all that, and WTF did that have to do with SpaceX. --So that was a scam/fake video, but my top comment is still how I feel!

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You are the victim of YouTube scam channels pretending to be SpaceX…

        SpaceX no longer streams on YouTube anymore, so anything you see will be fake.

        It’s also disappointing YouTube is so bad at catching these. During IFT4 that was literally the most watched stream, had more viewers than Everyday Astronaut for example.

        • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          EDIT: holy shit - I tried googling it since i thought I was taking crazy pills, and it says that was an AI-video that dubbed over elon?!

          I consider myself pretty keen on scam stuff (well… I didn’t buy any crypto so I guess I’m still good here) but man when I saw it I just shook my head an ignored it. I didn’t realize it was fake.

          wow.

          also, to be fair, he has been a proponent of crypto in the past.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pump&Dump?
        Musk bought into some shitcoin that crashed before he made profit, so even if he gives half away, the slight boost on price will let him dump the rest for less losses… Maybe?

    • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same. I bought stock in it when it IPO’d because he made a good road map that his engineers could get to and they made great use of government funding. He largely just seemed like an awkward nerd. The Thai cave rescue was the instance where I thought there was something seriously wrong with the dude. He decided to have a sub built even though nobody asked him to and the thing did not fit. Then he called one of the rescuers a pedophile. And not just as an odd insult; he doubled down on the claim. Since then it just seems he has been continually seeking attention.

      As for the company, their poor quality control was understandable 10 years ago but it’s still pretty fucking bad and I honestly think he is a big part of that. I recall watching a documentary a long time ago where the producer was talking to Musk about some of the challenges of making the Roadster. They were in a warehouse that had a couple dozen that had been inspected. Musk looked at the notes on one and it had a pretty major issue that would likely pop up but he was going to ship it anyway. The producer looked at it and noticed that they were looking at the car that would be going to him. Musk very awkwardly backpedaled. It sends that willingness to overlook major flaws has not left.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I was interested in Tesla when it was first getting big. But lost interest fast due to him. I would say you couldn’t pay me to own one, but if there’s 46 billion just burning a hole in someone pocket, well fuck, for a billion dollars I’ll be interested and for 2 billion I’ll own it.

  • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are you telling me that Elon Musk might be, perhaps, quiet quitting? The horror.

    Seriously, fuck that guy.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    5 months ago

    For a billion dollars I have a guaranteed plan to reduce operating expenses by 45 billion. Board of telsa feel free to hit up my DMs

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’s gotta share and the manager is buying it out of pocket so they’re gonna cut some little Caesars slices in half.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good thing Tesla has all that money rolling in from its wildly-successful Cybertruck debut.

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s funny, the world was excited for basically a teched out Toyota Tundra with shitloads of battery. The designers were ready to build that, and they could have kept literally everything else the same (steer by wire, steel skin, glass, bed cover, etc) and everyone would have been happy.

      Even looking weird people were excited for it.

      But then they deleted half the range and doubled the price and ::pikachu face:: everyone hates it.

      Sure, musk was the reason it looks weird, but I’d be willing to bet he’s 100% the reason for those other things too, because they likely had to cut weight and size to make it’s weird look physical possible.

      (I’d still buy it if it had 500+ range)

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or maybe the range sucks because some dipshit insisted it use heavy fucking stainless steel instead of lightweight aluminum or because some dipshit wanted it being “bulletproof” as a selling point.

        Sounds like some dipshit shouldn’t be making important decisions.

        • nxdefiant@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          They could replace the skin with foam board, but all that weight savings would just let them reduce the battery to save more on the manufacturing costs.

          FYI, it only weighs about 400lbs more than the F150 Lightning, so the skin probably doesn’t add much weight over a traditional truck skin. The four wheel steering tech and glass roof probably add more.

      • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        they could have kept literally everything else the same

        The literal sense of what you’re saying is implied since it’s not a figure of speech or hyperbole.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I finally saw one of those in person yesterday. It looked like a Hummer fucked a DeLorean.

      It reminded me of when Hummers were all the rage as a way to say, “look how much money I can piss away!”

  • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Award for Person You Could Easily Sell a Bridge To goes to chairperson Robyn Denholm.

    He seems motivated enough with Twitter and he makes negative money there. Considering the poster for he has created at Tesla, maybe they should not be motivating him.

    I do love that the pay package was blocked by a metal head who owned like five shares.

    • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I am guessing you could hire several hundred CEOs collectively for that price. And they would not be splitting their time between five companies. Robyn clearly had their nose so far up Musk’s ass that it is difficult to figure out where one ends and the other begins.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      musk already purchased her…

      Tesla Board Chairperson Robyn Denholm urged shareholders to re-approve CEO Elon Musk’s $46 billion pay package this week, saying the vote is “not about the money” while suggesting that Musk could leave Tesla or devote less time to the company if he isn’t properly compensated. “This is obviously not about the money. We all know Elon is one of the wealthiest people on the planet, and he would remain so even if Tesla were to renege on the commitment we made in 2018,” Denholm wrote in a June 5 letter to shareholders. Musk’s pay plan was nullified by a Delaware Court of Chancery ruling in January 2024 after a lawsuit filed by a shareholder. The ruling said that Denholm had a “lackadaisical approach to her oversight obligations” and “derived the vast majority of her wealth from her compensation as a Tesla director.” It also said most board members “were beholden to Musk or had compromising conflicts,” and that the proxy information given to shareholders before the 2018 vote was “materially deficient.”