No, extirpation is a local extinction. This species does not exist elsewhere. It’s not in any gardens or greenhouses. All we have left, essentially, is its DNA. You’ve already been told that.
Or are you claiming as long as we have a species’ genetic material, it isn’t extinct? Because I’m not seeing too many mammoths around these days, but we still sequenced their genome. I’d say they’re not extirpated, I’d say they’ve been extinct for thousands of years.
From the critically imperiled Big Pine partridge pea to the jumping prickly apple, any number of coastal species in the Florida Keys could be wiped out next in one of the places most vulnerable to sea level rise. And unlike the Key Largo cacti, which survives, if only barely, elsewhere, several of them are the last of their kind.
But this event still highlights another aspect of loss due to climate change, and it’s worth marking.
Not extinct. Only in that place.
It isn’t in any other places. They took cuttings from the last known plants to hopefully preserve it, but it’s functionally extinct.
Extirpation is the correct word.
No, extirpation is a local extinction. This species does not exist elsewhere. It’s not in any gardens or greenhouses. All we have left, essentially, is its DNA. You’ve already been told that.
Or are you claiming as long as we have a species’ genetic material, it isn’t extinct? Because I’m not seeing too many mammoths around these days, but we still sequenced their genome. I’d say they’re not extirpated, I’d say they’ve been extinct for thousands of years.
Right. From the article:
But this event still highlights another aspect of loss due to climate change, and it’s worth marking.