I’m pretty new to self-hosting, and the NAS I’m using right now has been a pain since the moment I bought it. The Synology DS220+ just doesn’t have enough CPU power for my needs, and I’ve recently used up all the disk space I installed, so I’m looking for a new server.

Unfortunately, all the options I’ve found online prioritize storage space over CPU, and I haven’t had much luck finding anything that fits my needs.

Requirements: CPU: Intel Core i3 or higher, but preferably Core i5 GPU: Not needed RAM: max 64 GB, min 16 GB Storage: max 32 TB, min 10 TB Network: 10 GB SPF+ Price: max 6K CAD, preferred 3K CAD

I’m hoping to run TrueNAS Scale with Plex and Nextcloud installed, and my media library isn’t likely to get larger than 5 TB, so CPU is really the main limiter of my current NAS.

As an example of something almost perfect: The TrueNAS mini X+ and R varieties would work excellently, but don’t meet the CPU requirement. I wanted to look at the other systems on offer from TrueNAS, but they don’t list out CPU specs for anything more advanced than the Mini line.

Of the Lenovo stuff, since it was one of the few websites with a filterable picker, the ThinkSystem SR630 V2 was the closest of fitting my requirements. It comes short on the CPU, though, and is verging on the price limit too. I also don’t need 12 TB of RAM, or 1.2 PB of storage.

What do you use? Can you recommend any websites I can go to find something that fits my needs better?

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    Have you considered just beige boxing a server yourself? My home server is a mini-ITX board from Asus running a Core i5, 32GB of RAM and a stack of SATA HDDs all stuffed in a smaller case. Nothing fancy, just hardware picked to fulfill my needs.

    Limiting yourself to bespoke systems means limiting yourself to what someone else wanted to build. The main downside to building it yourself is ensuring hardware comparability with the OS/software you want to run. If you are willing to take that on, you can tailor your server to just what you want.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      My home server literally was just my old desktop for the longest time. I upgraded the components in my desktop, and put them into another case and that became my server. Proxmox is based on Debian so any remotely sane hardware should be supported well, then I just virtualize everything else (including the NAS) and hardware compatibility isn’t even a concern.

      My current case is a Fracal Define R4 which natively supports 7 hard drives + 3 5.25 slots so I could add hot swap bays there. If I need more storage I have an extra drive cage, and the suggestion from people online is to just zip tie it to the normal one, and that gets me 11 drives of storage. Sure it won’t look pretty, but it works, it’s cheap, and it’s scalable, and that’s all that matters.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the answer.

      I’m currently running 2 boxes, one an old desktop with space for 8 full-size drives (which it has). The other is a Dell SFF with three 2.5" drives as a media server/testbed.

      Hard to heat either one for the cost. To buy the equivalent of the SFF as a pre-built NAS, I’d have to spend $1500.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you think about what the “S” in “NAS” is you’ll realize why they prioritize storage…

    You want a general purpose server.

  • pezhore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would consider using your Synology for what it’s good at - storage.

    My homelab has a Synology DS1618 and servers are Lenovo M90q systems. They have enough compute to get the job done, and use the Synology NFS mount for storage.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly. It’s plenty useful for Network-Attached-Storage. That’s what it’s built for.

      Your network needs are a bit over the top, but maybe consider the Minisforum MS-01. Small form factor, i5 or i9, up to 96G. RAM, and 2x SFP, and some low profile PCIE space if needed in the future. This is WAY more than you need for your service needs, and you can just expand your Synology disks for extra storage super easily. Saves money, and solves your problems without needing a full rack-sized server.

      • SethranKada@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thank you so much! After searching it up online, the Minisforum MS-01 seems to check off every box I’d had when I went looking.

        I’ll look around to see if there is anything more suited, but for now, it seems like what I’ll end up going with.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is a new model they’ve released, and I’ve been looking for something similar for a certain purpose for almost a year. There isn’t much lol.

          For my specific project, I ended up using a Fractal Design Ridge case, and the components that fit within because I needed a GPU. The MS-01 was JUST shy in the PCIE to make it my preferred device. Maybe have a look at the Fractal Design Ridge case and a Mini-ITX AMD build if you really want to stretch your dollar and get more performance-per-watt like I did. The cost will be about the same.

    • thequickben@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Second this suggestion. I run a synology NAS as well and it works great for that. My applications run on another box that mounts storage via NFS.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ha I came here to suggest the nas killer too. I built the nas killer 3 and it’s been running great for years.

      • __init__@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve been considering moving to this build in particular for lower power usage and heat output, but they have some other dual socket builds if you want more cpu power.

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Rack mount server class machines at home generally aren’t great options. Definitely stick with tower/mini designs.

    That said, for a home server a general workstation may be best. I personally have a System 76 Thelio. I added a second drive and installed proxmox with a ZFS mirrored pool.

    https://system76.com/desktops

    • biptoot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I disagree! They can be great options, inexpensive and reliable. My current home server is a Dell r620 with xeon CPUs, 64gbs of RAM, and 2 terabytes storage in raid 5. It serves several vms, a mix of Windows and Linux. More than enough for many home set ups. Boots the os off a 16gb flash card. Cost me $185. Thing has been a tank.

      I bought two short L brackets from home Depot, and have it hanging flat against the wall. It’s been fabulous.

  • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    My solution to this question a year or so ago was to take my gaming desktop, which was collecting dust after I moved to my gaming laptop, and gut it down to a 4U server rack case. Best decision I’ve ever made. 12 core Ryzen and 128gb memory. Got a 10g adapter in the pci express, 8xHDD for data and then 2 mirrored nvme for the OS itself. Only thing I kept out was the video card since I had no use for it (yet)

    An equivalent “server” on the market would probably cost a fortune and cost you a ridiculous amount of electricity.

  • root@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    No one has brought up Unraid OS specifically yet. Others have said just build your own machine, and yes absolutely this is the way. And then just slap Unraid on that and you have yourself exactly what you’re looking for. It’s user friendly, as powerful as your wallet can handle, and plenty of room for expandability.

    • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I was wondering if they were doing CPU transcoding in plex instead of using a client that supports direct playback. A few Apple TVs can generally do the trick at a much lower cost and double as YouTube and other streaming services clients.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are you looking at Dell/HP/Lenovo’s sites? Don’t do that, those are going to be way overpriced and way overkill. Also most of them are rack servers, not really suited to home use. If anything, you’d want to spec it out as a tower workstation.

    Personally I build mine out of parts, and usually used parts. Currently I’m using a little U-NAS NS-410 case, and I replaced all the internals with something better. Total cost was less than $400, I think.

  • epyon22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I made the jump to a full server a few years ago and there’s some pretty high limits but you can get them spec’ed pretty low. Something like a dell r730 Single 8 core xenon 32gb ram and a couple tb of storage running 4-500$. They can be upgraded over time to be dual 16 core xenon 1tb ram and petabyte of storage.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I bought a used desktop with 4 SATA ports. Has i5 7th gen and currently 5 TB and an 500GB SSD and has max ram of 64GB. I guess the HDD are not included in the price?

    I’m not sure what your software requirements are but if you go the DIY route a desktop works. I made the BIOS auto turn on on power restored and have services start on startup so it gives the server feeling.

    Bonus is that you can use it as a gaming server and upgrade the components easily for a while depending on the motherboard.

  • SethranKada@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If this isn’t the right community to post this, please let me know, and I’ll take it down. I don’t want to cause any trouble, I’m just looking for help. I’m really new to this kinda stuff.

  • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tiny/mini/micro makes up my server environment (and two customs using old cases and replaced parts).

    Storage is a 1520+ and the two customs, with the 1515+ for backups I don’t want to lose (syncs to two other locations).

    Tiny/mini/micro is the majority of compute tasks, mostly proxmox, LXC’s, and a few VMs.

    The little machines have plenty of processing power, usually nvme but I can add it on if needed. Combine it with network storage, and you don’t need anything else imo.

    Bonus is they are small and cheap as off lease machines being auctioned off.

  • Q The Misanthrope @startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I had an Intel s2600 with dual Xeon and 120 gigs of RAM. It seems like such a good idea to run that as a home server. However, the amount of power that it used because it was older was way too much.

    I ended up hunting on eBay and found an old Asus motherboard, Intel chip, ram, and a pny Nvidia card.

    I bought refurb hard drives from serverpartdeals and a new case from Amazon.

    I recommend starting with a chassis you want and working backwards to help narrow your scope.

    I know you wanted smaller but heres what I bought. SilverStone Technology CS382… https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CKTYSZV9?ref=ppx_pop_mob_ap_share

    Also, I run truenas scale with a bunch of apps. Ssd z1 for os. Ssd z1 for transcode and caches. And then 4 drive set for main storage and another 4 drive set for backup of the first set.

  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be fair the Synology lineup is confusing, but if you get the right model - one with a Ryzen processor and support for 32GB memory (officially; they can take more) - then you’ve got yourself a proper little workhorse with low power consumption, a stable, reliable OS, and super easy expansion thanks to the hot-swap drive bays and their Hybrid RAID option. My 8 bay model is running a couple of full-blown VMs and what must be two dozen or so docker containers while barely breaking a sweat. The DS723+ is the equivalent 2 bay model.

    For things that need some acceleration like Plex and Immich I’ve added a little N100 box (a Beelink S12 Pro) with Ubuntu Server and another Docker instance, and mounted the NAS storage via SMB. This also sips power even when transcoding 4x Plex streams at once.

    All of which is to say you don’t need to do a complex, potentially power hungry and difficult to expand self build to do what you want.