Disney tried to force the case into arbitration by citing the agreement on the widower’s Disney Plus trial account.

Disney has now agreed that a wrongful death lawsuit should be decided in court following backlash for initially arguing the case belonged in arbitration because the grieving widower had once signed up for a Disney Plus trial.

“With such unique circumstances as the ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach to expedite a resolution for the family who have experienced such a painful loss,” chairman of Disney experiences Josh D’Amaro said in a statement to The Verge. “As such, we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration and have the matter proceed in court.”

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    245
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Josh D’Amaro said in a statement to The Verge. “As such, we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration and have the matter proceed in court.”

    Sounds to me like they just want to keep that umbrella waiver in the Disney+ agreement rather than have that, rightly, struck down in court. They are very much still working under the assumption that a subscriber clicking “I Agree” to watch The Mandalorian waives any right to trial against any business unit of Disney Corp for any reason.

    Absolutely despicable.

    • Rooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You agreed to Disneys TOS

      Assassins from Disney licking their fingers because they can legally kill you /j

      Its the dumbest death you can have in an amusement park, dying because the restaurant didnt labeled their allergies right and that the corporation tries to dismiss it because of an DIGITIAL contract that was made for a digital service.

      But this is the bs that you got by applying law so freely.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, exactly.

        They’re asserting and graciously waiving a “right” they invented themselves in order to keep that from being challenged in court.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just this time, because I care about Disney so much, I’m waiving my right to steal from Disney.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ll set this precedent eventually. It will only take a few tries and especially against someone who cant fight back.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      An umbrella arbitration clause like this, if it were argued at court, surely would only be held up for cases related to Disney+. At least one would hope. Having such an agreement cover entirely separate arms of a company is ridiculous.

    • trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, imo they got worried that people would start asking government agencies to make legislation about things like this, so theyd rather backtrack now so they can keep it as part of their TOS.