• Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Lord I hate those fucking cunts who see two car lengths of space as an invitation. I’m going 85, you’re going 75, don’t suddenly hop in front of me because the clown in front of you is going 70.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Intelligent people leave a space of about two cars ahead of them on the freeway.

    Stupid people think that space must be for them.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    yeah me too. i get a lot of rollerskaters squeezing into the space so i keep backing off til theyre all jammed ass to mouth like a human centipede. gotta keep my distance for when the chain binds. and it will

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    When i was 13 bill Clinton told me 1 car length per every 10mph i was traveling at. Ive been following that advice ever since

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And I know it’s state dependent, but the highways by me, each white line is about one car and each gap is one car, so if you’re doing 50, having two to three white dashed lines between you and the car in front of you is probably good.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Fun fact: In most states, this length is 40ft, but there are some exceptions, like CA, where it’s 24ft or 48ft depending on the road.

  • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I leave enough room for me to have time to react and give the person behind me enough time to react to my breaking. Because most people drive way too close to avoid a rear-end collision if I have to slam my breaks for an emergency. Sometimes that means I’m 4, 5 or 6 car lengths away from the car in front of me, but that has the added benefit of pissing off tailgators who will almost immediately choose to pass me which works out great for me. The less space the person behind gives, the more space I leave between me and the person in front.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I just moved to Michigan

    I have never seen a group of drivers so committed to Tail Gateing … Like it’s the state sport

    • didntbuyasquirrel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I was driving in slowish freeway traffic in Detroit and the guy behind me plowed right into me, didn’t even slow down, didn’t even look away. He sort of bounced off of me, pulled onto the shoulder, and squeeled off while I had to find some sketchy spot to stop and make sure my bumper wasn’t dragging too much.

      A person I was visiting there in Detroit told me that insurance wasn’t required so many people run off rather than risk getting blamed and the cops wouldn’t even bother with a report.

      • greenhorn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Insurance is required in all of Michigan, with fines, license suspension, and jail all possible for not having it. With Michigan’s no-fault insurance we have some of the highest rates in the country in Detroit—especially relative to income—and almost no viable alternative to owning a car.

        That said, as a native Detroiter I feel safer in Detroit driving around other Detroiters, the suburbanites and out of state folks are always in the way.

        • didntbuyasquirrel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I thought I heard that insurance laws changed maybe since then or around that time and there was a reason for a lot of hit and runs. I don’t know, but that was my experience a while ago. The weird part was mostly how the dude had no visible reaction at all except to take off, which probably could’ve been anywhere.

          As an out of towner I did have trouble with the short on ramps. I wasn’t sure how to get into a rhythm because there was no place to get up to speed. I didn’t like feeling like I had to shove my way in and it was hard to tell how to let others in safely. I suppose you just know those things when you live there long enough.

          • greenhorn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Those are some of the first below-grade expressways built in the country, so the shorter on ramps are from an era with fewer and slower cars, and there isn’t space to lengthen them. The law only changed to stop the insurance companies from using zip codes to determine rates, and reduced the maximum payout for healthcare related costs from a crash, with the aim of lowering costs, but of course the insurance companies worked around it.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have a two lane road for most of commute every morning. What hate is when you pick up a buttplug. A buttplug is some dipshit who crawls up your ass and refuses to pass. They wont leave enough gap for the person behind them to pass without passing both of us and they wont pass themselves.

    What is crazy about this is that person will usually stay there until every car behind them has passed. After that they usually pass almost immediately.

    • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      In my experience, slowing down to just below the speed limit will usually irritate these tailgators enough to shake them off. Your mileage may vary though.

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is the way. Though I’ve had to come to a full stop and pull off the road a couple times…

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I think my biggest pet peeve about driving is when you come to a stop and the car behind you tries to shove their nose up your ass. Like bruh you don’t need to ever be that close

    • OR3X@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Especially annoying if you’re driving a manual and are stopped on an incline.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I drive a 6 speed. This is where my rage for this comes from.

        But even in automatics rollback isn’t uncommon on an incline.

        • OR3X@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I can usually set off on an incline with no rollback but I’ll be damn if it doesn’t slightly stress me out every time someone pulls that shit.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I feel like it really isn’t your fault if you role back 6 inches and hit them. If you were to roll back 4 feet it would be different but in this case you can’t control something so small.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            In court it won’t be your fault if they’re that close, but it’s still the hassle of dealing with people who don’t understand basic driving etiquette.

    • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My driving instructor taught me that I should still be able to see the other car’s back wheels when I stop. I actually don’t know how close that looks from the other driver’s perspective.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        What it looks like:

        1000005472

        Not actually as the “see the tires” rule is fairly good advise. Keep in mind sometimes it is smarter to give a little more space depending on the situation. Think of it as more of a minimum. Also lose most of your speed farther back and then role forward. This allows for recovery time in case of failure or loss of traction.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        So you can hit the car in front of you too?

        It’s not only a safety hazard but it leads to slower traffic. If you maintain the right distance at a stop the whole line of cars can accelerate faster because you don’t have to wait as long for the car ahead of you to move. There are zero actual benefits of sniffing my ass at a stop.

  • 1hitsong@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve always followed the rule of 1 car length for every 10 miles per hour you’re going.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I always (sometimes) do three seconds between me and the car in front of me. That automatically adjusts for increased speed.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        3 seconds when under 65. 5 seconds when it’s raining or I’m moving faster than posted highway speeds. It pisses people off but I’m hauling a ton of steel and plastic around, I’m not going to risk my life and everyone’s around me just because some guy is late for work or can’t be patient and needs to get where he’s going a few seconds before me. People tend to lose the reality of the situation when driving their super fast metal explosion machines.

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        When I did driver’s training, they recommended about 2 seconds of distance. I find it to be a reasonable distance most of the time.

        • Sandile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          2 seconds is not enough. Average human reaction time takes more than half that time. I was also taught to keep 3 seconds minimum distance on average 80 km/h zone. Faster driving, more distance should be kept.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      “Only a fool breaks the 2 second rule.”

      I was taught to repeat that phrase, at a normal steady pace, when I saw the back of their car go past something, to use as a marker (a signpost, the end of one of the lines on the road, whatever).

      If you finish the phrase after the front of your car has gone past the same marker, then you don’t have a big enough braking distance and need to ease off a bit.

      • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        My brother in law does this. Gets so close that you can’t see the rear tires of the car ahead, going 80+ mph. He’s been in multiple wrecks, including one where he totaled his custom BMW and almost died. He blamed the other driver (somewhat reasonably, they were drunk, but he was driving like a psycho), and refuses to change any of his driving habits.

        He also used to street race in Florida, with his family in the car. No, they did not consent to it, they’re just too scared of him to say anything.

  • lohky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    My car’s “smart cruise control” leaves what seems to be around a car length for every 10 mph, which is what I remember hearing in driving school. Feels a bit excessive in practice, but I also never feel like I’m being an asshole so I’m okay with it.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I was rear ended, HARD once. That distance gave me the space to control both my vehicle, and the one that hit me. It turned a potential multi car, multi lane pileup into a 2 vehicle wreck, either 1 more dinged car.

      The space isn’t for the 99.999% of the time, but that 0.001% OH FUCK time.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I almost had that happen to me a year ago. Traffic had stopped on the interstate and I hear skrrt, skrrt, skrrt, skrrt getting closer and closer to me. I looked up in my mirror and see a Silverado rapidly closing the distance and thought “god damn it”. I fortunately left enough room between me and the car in front of me that I was able to give him some more space and turned a full on collision into a tap that didn’t do any damage. Pretty sure my foot was actually off the brake when he hit me and that helped absorb some of it as well. I was still pretty pissed though because I had more than enough time to think about all these things and consider moving onto the shoulder but I thought he would do that instead and still hit me with how fast he was going. Being an idiot, he did not and hit me anyway.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’ve dodged similar collisions a couple of times, over the years. Unfortunately, this time, she didn’t even touch the brakes. I was hit with a 50 mph differential, and no warning whatsoever.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Well you want the automated system to be overly safe usually. It is better than the other way around.

      Having more space also gives the driver the to react.

      • lohky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Oh I’m not saying anything against it! I love that it leaves as much space as it does. Sometimes I just have to give it a little umpf to pass a semi because it sees the car waaay ahead and slows down.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you’re only two lengths away from the car in front of you while driving at highway speeds, you are tailgating. Back off. It’s far more dangerous than speeding.

    • tonyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Help me out with this, because it’s driving me crazy. Whenever I leave anywhere close to 2 seconds between me and the car on front of me, someone cuts in, and I’m now too close to them, so I slow down, leaving a 2 second gap, and another cuts in. Rinse, repeat. I end up being the slow ass that everyone keeps zooming around unless I tailgate.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Just… Don’t care? Let people in and adjust the distance with them. Driving is an involved process, get a car with adaptive cruise control if you want one that will do exactly that for you.

        • tonyn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I guess it’s more than just “caring” - I feel that we’d all be a lot safer if we were all going the same speed instead of inviting people to dodge in and out

          • kmaismith@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It would be safer if we were all riding the train/bus. Getting in a car in america is accepting the risk that you share the road with everyone. no matter the qualifications or mental state we still all gotta get to work/grocery store/wherever, and the only way is by ~4000 pound metal speed box.

            Worrying about safety on the highway is about making sure you are in situations you can handle and react to, staying attentive to the styles and mental states of other drivers and being a step ahead of the road conditions

            • tonyn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Unfortunately I can’t see how public transport would be feasible without accepting that the vast majority of places I might want to go are simply inaccessible, and the places I could go would take 3-5 times longer. Case in point, there are no public transportation options to get to my son’s high school. It would be a 35 minute bicycle ride. I can drive there in 12 minutes. Getting to my local Wegmans would take 37 minutes by bus. I can drive there in 9 minutes. I live on the outskirts of a medium size city on the east coast in a low density residential neighborhood.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            But people need to change lane sometimes and if you’re the one giving them the space to do so then more power to you, don’t complain

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It just be that way. Idiots will see your safe following distance as their opportunity to switch lanes. Just keep being the safe one.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      At 65mph, you cover two car lengths (~30 ft) in about 1/3 of a second.

      Typically human reaction time for braking is about 1.5 seconds.

      If something went seriously wrong in front of you (like a sideways car, or a hidden obstacle in front of the car in front of you) you would have covered 10 car lengths before your foot touches the brake pedal.