You always hear the phase “9 to 5” and also the song with the same name. Assuming you include 1 hour worth of breaks (30 minute lunch and two 15 minute breaks), you’re only working for 7 hours a day which comes up to 35 hours a week.

Now it feels like you have to work 8 hours a day (for a total of 40 hours of actual work), plus your other time off meaning you’re really there for 9 hours each day (for a total of 45 hours). Am i looking at that wrong, or did expected times change, and if so, when?

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You’re thinking small-time, like an hourly worker. Good office jobs are generally salaried positions and the idea of clocking in and out is… not a thing. Some days you work more, some less, whatever needs to be done. The idea of 9-5 is just a general time frame. And no one gives a shit when you lunch or break. In a real profession the yardstick is, are you getting it done or not?

    I’ll catch grief for saying that, so I’ll preempt by saying, if your job isn’t like that, you likely have a shit job.

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    My job is 9 to 5 including one hour lunch time when I started, it at least that’s what the HR person and my boss told me when I started. Early this year I saw my position “obligations” or whatever is called and it says that I work 9 to 6 so 🤷 I hope they never enforce it

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Your math ain’t mathing.

    The stereotypical “9 to 5” is an 8 hour shift with a paid hour “lunch break”. This includes two 10-15 minute breaks, which are also paid. You come to work at 9, do work, take breaks, take lunch, and then leave at 5. That’s 8 hours.

    My job is 8 to 430. I come in at 8, work till 12, then I have a half hour unpaid lunch. The unpaid lunch means I cannot be required to stay on site, which can happen with a paid lunch. Then from 1230 to 430 I work until I go home. There are two 10 minute paid breaks in there. I work 8 hours total in an 8.5 hour work day.

  • weariedfae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Everything changed. You’re not crazy. If you watch movies made before the 2000s about office culture, including the movie 9 to 5, you can see that the hours included a lunch break. Which was paid.

    Yes, those of the older generation had it easier in every way.

        • Deadrek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          39 minutes ago

          Ha! Nah, Federal law doesn’t require a lunch period, or breaks, at all. It’s all state side.

          Only thing is that if an employer gives a short break, like 5-20 mins, it must be paid and included in overtime.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I live in Canada. We get a half-hour lunch that isn’t paid in my province.

        Also, if you take more than 3 sick days a year, your boss can fire you. And the 3 sick days are unpaid. The government lowered the number from 10 to 3 shortly before the pandemic, and didn’t raise it again! Oh, and to count, your boss can demand a doctor’s note. Which cost money to the patient.

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              That really sounds like one of the flat-lander regions.

              I get 21 holidays a year, not counting every second friday off because of my 9x9 compressed-time agreement. If I plan it right, and hit the stats with the comp days, that’s 7 weeks off a year. Why, that’s almost european. I’ve just finished my first year at this shop.

      • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Most people don’t. So, for an average employee, it would be 9-530 to account for their unpaid 30m lunch required by law.

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In the US, you’re lucky if you get paid for the hours you work. And many don’t get all of their hours paid.

        • Kaboom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          In the US, it’s Salary, not Hourly. It’s not “getting paid for the time”, you get paid for doing the job you agreed to do.

          • totallynotaspy@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            That’s just salaried folks though. The vast majority of american workers are hourly or contractors. Per the Dept of Labor’s own site:

            The Wage and Hour Division is dedicated to protecting and enhancing the welfare of the nation’s workforce with a focus on low-wage, underserved workers. In fiscal year 2023, we successfully recovered over $274 million in back wages and damages for more than 163,000 workers nationwide.

            Wage theft is when employers don’t properly pay their employees and is a HUGE problem because it isn’t always out of malevolence, it can be as simple as the time clock not properly computing overtime, etc.

            If you don’t think that $274 million is large amount, think about how the vast majority of these things never get reported to the authorities; that number should be higher.

            Source for quote: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/data

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Most salaried workers are written up if they fail to work 8+ hours. Salaried is now just a method to deny people overtime - fancied salaried workers may still operate in the intended way but even most developers I know have to obey some sort of time tracking method.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Depends on the state, in my state you legally have to get paid for 30 minute lunches but not hour long lunches. No idea why but because of this most office jobs will give you an hour lunch in addition to your mandated 2, 10 minute breaks.

        Honestly I would love to just take a 30 minute break and get out earlier. It’s not even about the money.

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I work 10’s and we get 2 paid 20 minute breaks that are actually usually 25-30 depending on how caught up we all are individually since they let you walk away early if you’re caught up and how long after you get up, go to the bathroom, get some coffee , put your stuff up.

        They’re actually pretty chill as long as you stay caught up

    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Those old tv shows where they casually eat breakfast before work make more sense. They weren’t up at 6, rushing to get to work by 8. They had a whole hour more.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I am 51. When I started working my job was 9-5 with a one hour lunch an unofficial 30 minute coffee break and about four unofficial ten minute smoke breaks.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    All my jobs have either been 9-5 or 9:30-5:30 with an hour lunch included. TBH I’ve never tracked my pay by the hour, just the day.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes. And if you interview for an 8 to 5 job, you tell them that it sounds like a crock of shit and you don’t want the job.

    So sick of that shit. Fuck any employer who pulls this shit.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t WANT your crock of shit job! I’ll go live on the streets!!! I’ll give blowjobs for $20! And hey…you want a blowjob? Got $20?

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Employers don’t usually broadly advertise their anti-perks. This is the kind of thing you usually discover with a question during an interview or when you’re handed your employment contract.

  • criitz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I work in a salaried office job in the US, and in 2 decades of working at different companies I’ve always worked 9 to 5 AND taken an hour lunch. Of course, I’ve also had plenty of pressure to work outside of those hours when needed. Which escalated to 50-60 hour weeks with night and weekend work at the worst (I left that job shortly after).But I’ve never done 9 to 6 as official hours.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Same. For professional work nobody really cares how you punch the clock as long as you get your work done and don’t try to be too annoying about your hours. The only time I’ve ever even heard it brought up was when someone tried to work like 5am to 1pm meaning they had a very small window to schedule meetings with normal people.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As a guy with an actual office job. It’s usually 8-5 or 9-6 with an hour lunch, plus whatever time you spend on coffee or whatever.

    It’s pretty standard, and it’s been that way for a couple decades at least.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Where are you working where you are expected to work through your breaks? 9-5 should include your break times as well, yes.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m Canadian myself but isn’t this illegal? In Canada we have a labor program where you can file a complaint if it comes to that.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          In British Columbia our labor laws were basically written by EA so tech workers have almost no protection against overtime unless it’s contiguous - the only hard limit on working is once you hit 32 continuous hours you must be given time off… BC high tech employees are exempt from any overtime and the only limit they still get is that they must be given eight hours off every day - but that’s eight hours not working, not necessarily eight hours of sleep. So you could be asked to work 32 continuous hours then be sent home with a forty-five minute drive, get home, sleep for six and a half hours (or try to) then get back in your car to drive back to the office to work another sixteen hours.

          If you objected to this schedule you could quit but you’d have no legal recourse to sue your employer.

          Oh, and in the above three day scenario (home for eight, work for thirty two, home for eight, work for sixteen) you’d be paid the same if you worked for twenty four hours over three days.

          BC tech workers have no rights.

        • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Depends on the state. But the reality is you need to hire a lawyer to fight it and we already have to choose between a roof and food most of the time so good luck with that.

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That sucks, sorry to hear that. I honestly thought the US had a similar thing as well. I guess that explains the huge push for more unions across the US over the past few years.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          In Canada full time is whatever an employer decides it is, not 35h, not even 40h. In Quebec an employer isn’t required to give 15mins break. But if they do they must be paid. The 30mins lunch break is mandatory, but also unpaid. You’ve just gotten lucky with decent employers/union jobs. I’d imagine other provinces are similar.

          https://www.cnesst.gouv.qc.ca/en/working-conditions/work-schedule-and-termination-employment/work-schedule/presence-work-breaks-and-weekly-rest-period

          An employer is under no obligation to offer breaks but when a break is granted, it must be paid and be included in the calculation of the hours worked.

          After 5 consecutive hours of work, a worker is entitled to a 30-minute meal break, without pay. If the worker is required to remain at their workstation during this time, their meal break must be paid.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In Canada, the regulations have been 8 hour workday with two paid 15 minute breaks in that period and an unpaid 30 minute break for salaried workers, unless otherwise agreed by contract, since I started working in the early 90s.

    This means a lot of people work 9-5:30 or 8:30-5. Union jobs generally have a 8 hour day in total with a 1 hour lunch break, and other professions have other arrangements.

    For a number of years, I took my “lunch break” at 5 and just worked a straight 8 hour day with two 15 minute breaks.

  • Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    My time sheet totals 37.5 hours of work per week and I can take take a lunch break of 30 to 60 minutes. The break is unpaid and a minimum break of 30 minutes is required after 5 straight hours of work so the lunch break is mandatory.

    Typically this works out to 7.5 hours work with a 30 minutes break totalling 8 hours on site. Smaller breaks are untimed so if we need to stretch our legs or get some fresh air no one is watching the clock. We also have a pretty good culture of not interrupting people’s lunch with work issues so that does feel like an actual break.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It depends on where you are and whether you join a union or not. Labor laws vary by state and by country. Paid lunches and breaks may or may not be part of your employment contract.