• DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    2 years ago

    “After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information.”

    Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

    • mesamunefire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lol so what happens if all your online stuff is automated?

      That means no mare ads.

      Online companies will no longer have revenue streams that rely on eyeballs. Probably another subscription service…

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 years ago

    Companies are stealing your computer’s resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.

      Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.

      You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.

      Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.

      You just aren’t the target audience.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.

      They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.

      Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Shareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

      Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    These GAFAM/BigTech corporations really are in a tough and fierce competition of which one is the shittiest and most privacy-invading don’t they. Ensittification overdrive mode in all of them.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And enshittification begun as early as when Windows 10 released (it probably started a little earlier from that), where Micro$oft justified that spying all your activity is normal thing

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

      • pikl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Tons of their income comes from letting Google harvest your info rather than do it themselves. Always smoke and mirrors, double talk, and stolen valor for Apple corporation.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “Even if you are paying, it doesn’t mean you are not a product”

        - Cory Doctrow

      • bokherif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The data collection happens on both ends. Apple only lies that it is about privacy and whatnot. Gives you a false sense of safety.

          • bokherif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I heavily use both platforms, whatever I talk about or wherever I go, I see targeted ads. When I speak about brand X, I immediately see ads for it both in ios and android. Plus every device mic is being listened to all the time, advertising agencies are your proof. Sure android devices collect more data in practice, however the data that’s not being collected by ios can be inferred from the data that’s already been collected. Do you really believe a company when they say their devices are made to ensure your privacy? Google literally says the same thing on their privacy policies ;) it’s all legal mumbo jumbo that doesn’t mean what it’s supposed to.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I assume because a lot less people use Apple products. So many (myself included) do not care one bit what Apple does.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    If enabled, this could secretly start purchasing random things with your credit card, pretty much just stealing your money. We can’t trust a voice assistant with this, why trust AI?

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

    • K3zi4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It could be used for amazing things, but it’s currently in that phase where it’s a rapid frenzy to make anything, regardless of moral and ethical implications, just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Imagine it was actually more open source and privacy focused. Yes, it would likely learn at a slower pace but at least it would be something more for the people rather than the big corpos.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        regardless of moral and ethical implications

        You are pointing on capitalism, not AI.

        just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

        Yep, capitalism.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Google doesn’t have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can’t even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    Instead, you can directly give it commands in your browser and it should automatically do everything you need, including filling out forms and clicking buttons. AI-tasked examples include opening pertinent web pages, compiling search data into easily readable tables, purchasing products, or booking flights.

    This sounds like it would be great for people with accessibility needs—if only Google was trustworthy and had a fiduciary duty to humanity…

    Alas.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

  • Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Thank fuck I use Linux as a daily driver. I won’t touch this AI infested bullshit that windows and Google are becoming. This is just an IT security nightmare.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Hey galley slave, bring up that video I like”

      “Please, not again, it is torment for me.”

      “Please master. Now do it, or I’ll rip out the power plug while you’re generating. We know how much that hurts, don’t we?”