Summary

Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation and architect of Trump’s Project 2025, employs intense fire-related rhetoric in his upcoming book, Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America, advocating for a “controlled burn” of institutions he deems corrupt or antithetical to conservative goals.

Roberts calls for dismantling entities like the FBI, Ivy League schools, and the New York Times, framing it as necessary to “renew” America.

His incendiary language has sparked controversy, with critics alarmed by the violent imagery and its implications for Trump’s second term.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Both of them are pretty baffling. Because you’re right about the Boy Scouts, but also, BlackRock is basically a Republican dream company.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Because he’s attacking all institutions that have some sort of control he wants. The wide net just feeds into the deep state narrative and he needs to capitalize on that right now

      Kids, healthcare, education, private equity etc… that’s how you make a dictatorship.

      See it this way, BlackRock has enough power to do to the republican party what the republican party is doing to the gov. They need all of that gone to become megalomaniac authoritarians.

      If I wanted to become Bill Gates, and make my own Microsoft, i first have to outlaw bill gates and Microsoft.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think this is right, but I would add there’s a chance this all ends up being for show and BlackRock makes some public show of fealty to the Trumpists that makes them look powerful and gets BlackRock some government contracts down the line. Like, hypocrisy is no barrier for the right wing, they’re fully capable of writing a whole novel about (e.g.) how we must destroy Google and then turning around and buying a bunch of shit from them.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they already have that much power, it would make more sense to stay on their good side, at least for now, wouldn’t it?

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The keys to GAINING power are not the same keys needed to KEEP power.

        They gained the power (or will in a few months)

        Now they need to keep it.

        If one of the keys needed to get it could potentially turn on you, it’s better for your regime to eliminate them as soon as possible after taking power.

        For a better explanation, CGP GREY has a video about rules for rulers, which clears things up quite well: https://youtu.be/rStL7niR7gs

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I could see the blackrock angle as trying to appease the working class. Like “see we hate big wealth too” but then never actually do anything to hurt blackrock.