The team behind menstrual health and period tracking app Clue has said it will not disclose users’ data to American authorities, following Donald Trump’s reelection.

The message comes in response to concerns that during Trump’s second presidency, abortion bans that followed the overturn of Roe v. Wade in 2022 will worsen and states will attempt to increase menstrual surveillance in order to further restrict access to terminations.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or until the American people get bored with talking about it, like with everything else, then stop caring and just let whatever happen.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why the hell period data needs to be stored on the cloud?

    How much could it weight? A few Kb? Local storage!

    I would never trust such data leaving my device when is no need for it whatsoever.

    Aren’t there any open source period tracking apps? I’ll do one, it can’t be that hard. An sqlite database patched to a frontend calendar and some basic predictions based on normal scenarios.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Newsweek has really trash headlines. No one’s asking, yet, so that’s a terrible headline.

    (Yes I voted Kamala, and yes I did it for medical autonomy reasons as well as orange potato reasons, Vance reasons, heritage foundation reasons, and Project 2025.)

    It’s still a trash headline and pretty standard fare for Newsweek. Why is it trash? Because it’s classic The Boy Who Cried Wolf. When I read this headline, I need it to be real.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    First I thought “WTF is period data a thing that should concern the government”, but then I noticed we are talking about the future Handmaids Tale country here.

  • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Still not worth the risk to download it. Get a paper journal, they make ones that guide you through tracking all the necessary data.

  • ForgottenFlux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    284
    ·
    3 days ago

    Research conducted by the Mozilla Foundation indicates that the app referred to in the article, Clue, gathers extensive information and shares certain data with third parties for advertising, marketing, and research reasons.

    Here are some menstruation tracking apps that are open-source and prioritize user privacy by keeping your data stored locally on your device:

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but tracking period data can be very helpful for people. For a threat model of abortion criminalisation (or maybe trans healthcare criminalisation with treatments stopping periods, or really any kind of restrictions on medical autonomy), encryption at rest of locally stored period data is perfectly sufficient. They are not going to send military intelligence agencies after a random person having an abortion. It is actually a relatively low threat model, like equivalent to buying drugs online or something like that.

        • Arbiter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mostly mean having data stored in a centralized database owned by a corporation. Since even if it’s encrypted you’re just one warrant away from the data being handed over.

          • communism@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If only the user has the key then there’s no real concern with the data being handed over

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do they need to save the tracked period data to a server farm? Why can’t it just be saved on the phone, huh?

    • el_abuelo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably because they want to be able to maintain users during device switches. Given much of the world is on an annual or bi-annual cycle it’d suck to lose your users each time.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    3 days ago

    They say that, but when Ken Paxton subpoenas them they will say they have no choice. It would be better to use an app that doesn’t store this data server side at all.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        How does an app being FOSS defend them from warrants?

        Edit. Thank you guys for the details. I learneded something new today, much appreciated.

        • gaiussabinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          FOSS implies it’s your hardware, therefore a subpoena would extract no information because there is no information outside of the users device.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              “Free and open source software.” It’s an ethos that says that code should be free and open for people to use and improve as they see fit. The core of it is that if you modify any software that is FOSS, your software must also be FOSS. So overtime the software and what its used for improve, change, widen. Lucky for us, the movement has been ongoing for 50+ years, so it’s a mature ethos whose benefits are everywhere. Most of the internet runs on FOSS. Lemmy itself is FOSS.

              It doesn’t necessarily mean an app is more private, but it does mean you can generally self host, as the commentor said. There isn’t a profit motive with most FOSS, at least not at its core, so there is little desire to data harvest generally. There is also a heavy overlap between FOSS advocates and privacy advocates, so they tend to be more privacy conscious via local data storage or encryption.

              • AliasVortex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                3 days ago

                Just to key in on the overlap between FOSS and privacy, because the source code for the software is open, it means that anyone can take a peek at how everything is running under the hood (among other things). It becomes possible to verify that software is storing data locally and properly encrypting when applicable (as opposed to blindly trusting the software’s author and or lawyers).

                It may also be a fun fact that best practice in encryption is to open source your algorithms. The helps safeguard against backdoors and mistakes/ errors that could compromise the security of the algorithm. Much for similar reasons as above, as it allows the security community to check your math (in a field where it is incredibly easy to get your math wrong).

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Ok yeah, I understood everything in your first paragraph. The privacy part was what I was really asking about. So if you’re not self hosting you’re still at the whim of the person/company/whatever that is.

                • ch00f@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  You could also argue that if even if you’re not self-hosting (i.e. renting server hardware from a 3rd party), your data is still in a siloed environment. While it may be accessible by law enforcement if you are targeted specifically, it’s unlikely to be dragnetted like the data collected from popular apps.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Something being FOSS doesn’t necessarily mean it’s safe / ethical, but a LOT of FOSS apps are designed with those principles in mind.

          However, being FOSS means that if an app claims that it is safe / ethical (ex. In this case, not storing data anywhere but on your device), you or an experienced peer can check the code to verify that fact.

        • Pirky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 days ago

          It doesn’t, but with these apps, you can see what information they send back to their servers (if any). If there is no info getting sent back to any servers, then there’s nothing a subpoena can do since there’s no info to subpoena. You can’t obtain info that just isn’t there.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Simple. Most FOSS are built for privacy and thus do not harvest data to send to some server somewhere in the world for whatever obscure reason. The data is locally stored on your device and stays and dies there.

          No callback, no selling nor surrending data.

          Personally speaking, I’d quicker have all data banks destroyed than surrendered to whatever purposes, if I ever decided to build an aplication that somehow compiled data.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah they may not cooperate with authorities, but I’m sure they’d be happy to sell it to contractors working on behalf of the government to the same ends. They already sell the info as it is.

  • kureta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    menstrual surveillance

    Now that’s a phrase I would’ve never thought I would read.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why? It’s a logical outcome of the combination of mass surveillance and draconian anti abortion laws. This is the sort of shit the judicial construction of the implied right to privacy was kinda built around stopping. This is just straight up the sort of shit Snowden warned us of.

      So yeah, the federal government (and likely state as well), who have the data from your personal devices to understand far more of your sex life than you want your friends knowing, much less your Senator, are able to purchase or subpoena data from menstrual tracking apps and will do as the law tells them to. The law, meanwhile is written by a group of people who are vastly disproportionately elderly men with little to know understanding of any branch of science or medicine. A group notable for comments like the assumption that ecoptic pregnancies can be replanted and that presenting a snowball disproves global warming. The one gynecologist of note to have been in Congress in recent memory being Ron fucking Paul, who incidentally was anti choice.

      To sum my previous paragraph to a thesis statement: people who have no idea how bodies work and couldn’t tell a Skene’s gland from a vas deferens and disproportionately think pee comes out the vagina get to decide the rules by which people who know every aspect of your life that they choose to look for decide if your menstrual irregularities are normal or an illegal abortion.