itsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1377arrow-down110
arrow-up1367arrow-down1imageThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeitsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down4·2 years agoBoth sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 years agoWho said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoJust keep these fellas out of it:
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoThey’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·edit-22 years agoIn the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down3·2 years agoIf you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
minus-squareelidoz@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 years agoovaries are just nuts in the inside
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoI Snickers at this comment.
minus-squarePumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoColloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·edit-22 years agoAnd if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/ https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoyo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
Who said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
Just keep these fellas out of it:
They’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
ovaries are just nuts in the inside
I Snickers at this comment.
Colloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
And if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
yo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Yes.