• catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        89
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean, I can count how many times I’ve thought “damn I wish I still had wired headphones” on zero hands.

        • OnfireNFS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’ve never really understood the argument against headphone jacks. I can still use Bluetooth headphones with my phone. I can also use wired headphones and aux cables on my phone. Why would you want less features

          • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            8 days ago

            I’d be fine if they gave us another USB C port, but inability to listen and charge the phone at the same time without using Bluetooth (which also needs to be charged) grinds my gears.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            I’m not arguing against it, just not particularly arguing for it. Out of all the removed features, I’d want the IR blaster back. I can’t do that with Bluetooth.

        • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          Must be nice to either accept the objectively worse sound quality of wireless headphones, or be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price and just not care about it getting stolen.

          • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            8 days ago

            I care a moderate amount about audio quality, but my bigger gripes with Bluetooth generally involve the latency and inconvenience of switching devices (even with multipoint).

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            IDK about you, but in the environments where I’d use headphones with my phone are not environments where I’m capable of noticing the audio difference between bluetooth and wired.

            Ten times is an extreme exaggeration unless you’re really at the bottom end of earbuds. Decent quality bluetooth headphones aren’t that much more expensive.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            If I cared that much about audio quality, I wouldn’t be listening to music on my phone anyway.

            I’m not sure which product you’re referring to that’s ten times the price. You can get quality monitors for around $200. I don’t know of any Bluetooth headphones that are going to match that quality at any price, but you can get close enough for the majority of purposes in the same price range. The biggest issue will be the Bluetooth audio codec and the wireless link itself (signal strength and latency), not the sound reproduction quality.

                • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  If you going to complain about that, never listen to a CD or any other digital format. Let me guess, only vinyl is pure?

                  • catloaf@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    I’m not the one complaining about it, hence the “if” in my previous comment.

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price

            Or maybe just go buy a $5 adapter so you can use your wired headphones

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            7 days ago

            FYI “to each their own” was a phrase used on the entrance of a nazi concentration camp, same as “work sets you free”. Might wanna avoid that phrase in the future

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              7 days ago

              Makes no sense. Using a commonly used phrase has nothing to do with Nazis in almost any context despite the origin. No need to start making a list of things to change because of an old connection to something bad.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I dunno, how about the horrible privacy practices of most cars nowadays? Bluetooth allows connection, sure. It also allows data to go between the device and the car. An aux jack can’t do that.

          • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            An aux jack can’t do that.

            Really? Because there are aux jacks that allow for voice and volume control. Seems to me like they could make one for “real data”.

            • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Well, if they can, that’s interesting. But the method used to control volume and a mic are a hell of a lot simpler than transferring data. You’d need an expanded jack with extra circuitry afaik.

              At that point, you’re over to a usb cable, which is where all this starts.

              • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                I mean, it’s all just electrical signals. They could simplify the data for such a transfer. The volume and mic do have an extra wire or two in them, but those are still made no bigger than those without, and the jack just has an extra ring or two on it for the connection. Most everybody is oblivious to the presence of those rings. So, I would say it’s totally possible, but is it worth it money-and-effort-wise?

                • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Well, there’s a difference between analog and digital. So, no matter how you cut it, if the aux jack is there, making it do double duty is essentially turning it into a usb port.

                  You can’t really send much data at any kind of useful speed over the size and types of wiring in even the more complicated headphone wires, which usually aren’t even present in an actual aux cord that’s got a plug on each end.

                  The level of data transfer over Bluetooth is both higher, and is already set up to move data like the cars nowadays scrape.

                  So, while it would conceivably be possible to make new aux cords that are beefed up to do it, and make the jacks in both phones/tablets and head units interpret the signals, it isn’t so much whether or not it’s worth it money wise, it’s will the car owners and passengers buy it?

                  The connectors, as is, have a limited number of connections, poles. To change that, you have to make the plugs and jacks bigger, or radically redesign them.

                  From a “worth it” standpoint, they’re already taking the cheaper way out of trying to force everyone to use the Bluetooth that’s already built in. Get device makers to stop having jacks, stop putting them in cars, and the problem is solved on their end. It then falls to the consumer to find a way around that.

        • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.idM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          To be honest, I’ve used Bluetooth headphones before Android was even a thing (stupid W850i proprietary ports and all) and love them.

          However, dickhead here just put my Soundcore buds through the wash so there is argument for me having a backup which this Poco F6 is now lacking.

          It’s a silly divisive topic IMO which is never gonna be solved when blog authors put out articles like the above.

          :(

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not crazy to want to keep using your excellent wired headphones and not rely on battery powered bullshit

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        It is when you act like adapters don’t exist

        This is written by someone who’s using IEMs on a pixel, this weird obsession with jacks on the phones should have died years ago

        • zod000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m using IEMs on a pixel too, with a jack as intended not some bullshit dongle.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      My daily driver is a Poco F2 Pro which has the jack port.

      My car is old and I still wire it to the speakers for using Spotify and such, my gf has to use the adapter thingy for her iPhone and she can’t charge and play music at the same time, I can do that without an issue.

      Too bad companies keep getting rid of ports.

      • Ranta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        A fellow F2 Pro owner here. I don’t have use for the aux port that often, but whenever I do, it’s great! Older cars, mixers, etc, everything is just plug and play like it should be.

        However the notorious charging port ribbon cable seems to have broken again and this might be some of the last things I write with the phone :(

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          However the notorious charging port ribbon cable seems to have broken again and this might be some of the last things I write with the phone :(

          Yeah, that is one annoying issue for sure.

          It happened to mine as well, what I did year (years?) ago, was to use a tiny piece of electric tape in the flex to make pressure and make it to recognize the charger as well…

          Still working fine after that.

          If your device stops recognizing data I think it is game over though.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        There are adapters with charger throughput. Or else a car phone holder with wireless charging capability that’s connected to the cigarette lighter port will do the trick.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      I just got a USB-C to 3.5" adapter and done. The phones listed here are either overpriced or shit.

      • Retrograde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Extremely hard disagree. Have you used a modern Sony phone before? What makes the Sony over priced compared to it’s Apple, Samsung or Google counterparts?

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I’ve used older Xperia phones, not new ones. But a list price of 1400 bucks is by default overpriced. Samsungs are so full of bloat and proprietary shit, I wouldn’t touch them, ever. Plus their bootloader can’t be unlocked, which is heavily restricting my use cases.

          Wouldn’t ever touch Apple devices either, and while Pixel phones are great, the price points of the new 9 Pro at around 900 bucks is high, but barely in acceptable range for me. Don’t have one (still happy with my OnePlus 10 Pro, that was about 650 bucks I think), but that’s the only high end brand you mentioned that I would consider if I were to upgrade at this point.