• john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    You didn’t make your point. You said you weren’t going to make your point and then proceeded to personally insult me.

    You still haven’t explained why prejudice isn’t acceptable for racists but it is acceptable for misandrists.

    So, what exactly is your point?

    Did… did you see the part where I said “neither are an excuse for bigotry and prejudice”? Or did you just conveniently ignore that part so you could say I don’t have a point?

    I’ve made it clear from the very beginning: misandry isn’t acceptable behavior and it’s part of a double-standard that you are proudly defending. You got upset about this and proceeded to attack me without explaining why the same arguments racists use to justify their racism are somehow acceptable to justify your sexism.

    • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Rofl, can you point to the prejudice and/or bigotry? Nobody is suggesting we deny service to men, remove men’s civil rights, or do literally anything to men. All your rights and liberties are fully intact. Women being cautious, scared and wary of men because they fear for their safety is not bigotry, prejudice, or sexism. It’s a rational and direct response to society’s complete and utter failure to protect them, and even further, society’s active efforts to protect the rapists and punish the victims.

      We’re all in here talking about protecting women in a world where way too many people think rape is perfectly acceptable, and you’re in the back shouting “but how do we protect the men!?” and you genuinely don’t see a problem with that. Jesus Christ. Men are protected, it’s women who are vulnerable.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If you need me to spell out why judging somebody before you know them based on their sex is prejudiced and sexist, then you need to look up what the definitions of those words mean.

        • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Nobody is prejudging anyone. It’s risk mitigation. I don’t lock my doors at night because I’m prejudiced or bigoted towards my neighbors. I lock them because there’s a non zero statistical chance that someone might try to break in. Do you not understand what risk management means? Then you need to look up what the definitions of those words mean.

          • john89@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Nobody is prejudging anyone. It’s risk mitigation.

            Yeah, the racists say the same thing about avoiding minorities.

            It’s clear you’re never going to accept your bigotry.

            • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              It’s clear you’re a misogynistic incel that thinks you deserve access to a woman’s body against her will :). Thanks for the self report.

              • john89@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                Back to the personal attacks.

                Anything to avoid admitting you’re part of the problem.

                I’ll accept this as your surrender. Have a nice day. You may have the last message since you’re dying for it.