BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoLet's gooooooo.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up12.02Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.99Karrow-down1imageLet's gooooooo.lemmy.worldBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squarem-p{3}@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down1·1 year agoOnly if the wealth is redistributed to the masses though.
minus-squarevrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 year agobut if not, and they have two or more children ic tje amount gets split between them. Then you handlo those, and their children etc. It’s financial homeopathy
minus-squareakilou@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoBy this algorithm, it would have to. Otherwise it’d just create a new billionaire who’d go to the back of the line
minus-squarezout@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoIn some cases, the wealth might simple be gone because the stock crashes of which the bulk of the wealth is built.
Only if the wealth is redistributed to the masses though.
but if not, and they have two or more children ic tje amount gets split between them. Then you handlo those, and their children etc. It’s financial homeopathy
Narrator: it isn’t
By this algorithm, it would have to. Otherwise it’d just create a new billionaire who’d go to the back of the line
In some cases, the wealth might simple be gone because the stock crashes of which the bulk of the wealth is built.
deleted by creator