BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 4 months agoLet's gooooooo.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up11.98Karrow-down131
arrow-up11.95Karrow-down1imageLet's gooooooo.lemmy.worldBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squarem-p{3}@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down1·4 months agoOnly if the wealth is redistributed to the masses though.
minus-squarevrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up26·4 months agobut if not, and they have two or more children ic tje amount gets split between them. Then you handlo those, and their children etc. It’s financial homeopathy
minus-squareakilou@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months agoBy this algorithm, it would have to. Otherwise it’d just create a new billionaire who’d go to the back of the line
minus-squarezout@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months agoIn some cases, the wealth might simple be gone because the stock crashes of which the bulk of the wealth is built.
Only if the wealth is redistributed to the masses though.
but if not, and they have two or more children ic tje amount gets split between them. Then you handlo those, and their children etc. It’s financial homeopathy
Narrator: it isn’t
By this algorithm, it would have to. Otherwise it’d just create a new billionaire who’d go to the back of the line
In some cases, the wealth might simple be gone because the stock crashes of which the bulk of the wealth is built.
deleted by creator