It’ll cost $9 each time. They’re raising money for the mass transit system by charging specifically those people who don’t use the mass transit system and that feels really unfair to me.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Sigh, mass transit will benefit you as well, it means that more people will use it rather than taking the car, thus reducing traffic in general.

    Taxes are also often used to change behaviors in the population, by adding taxes like these, cities have been known to try and reduce pollution and congestion making the area less harmful.

    TL;DR: Congestion charges are annoying, but in the end will benefit you as well.

      • Teanut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        I did notice this news article that mentions:

        New Yorkers who live within the Congestion Relief Zone will not be charged to drive or park around the area. They will only be charged once they leave and cross back into the zone.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not familiar with NYC, but isn’t this exactly the opposite of their goals? If you are staying within the congestion zone, you should be taking a different form of transportation. It’s only when leaving that area that you have a (potentially) valid reason to take your own car.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Most congestion pricing schemes rely only on tolling the boundary and generally target central business districts with little internal traffic. The technology is there to install more internal tracking of traffic, but you’d probably push up against privacy groups and the deployment of the tech would be a lot more expensive.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re costing society by driving your private vehicle at all let alone in downtown manhattan. The least you could do for all of the lung cancer, asthma, and road fatalities you’re contributing to is pay some money.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I once knew someone who commuted into NYC each day by rail – drove to the train station, and went from there. Can move out of NYC and commute in, I suppose. Housing will probably be cheaper. Was a long commute.

    that feels really unfair to me.

    Well, I mean, the real limited resource that they’re charging for is gonna be the available road space, as they’re going to be trying to reduce traffic load, I expect, as the road network is just overloaded. I don’t know if there’d be a realistic alternative to provide much more road space in Manhattan with the funds. Like, where would you put it? They’d have to bulldoze tall buildings or something.

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      People without sense want to get rid of central park, and turn all the subway lines into underground roadways.